US Election

Is this the best thread ever and the other poxy international thread should be closed

  • Yes because I’m a winner

    Votes: 8 88.9%
  • No because I’m a loser

    Votes: 2 22.2%

  • Total voters
    9

Remove this Banner Ad

For those actually interested, Columbian exports to USA include Oil $6B, Coffee $1.8B, cut flowers $1.6B.

So if the tariffs go ahead, you would expect many of these items will be sourced from other countries without tariffs.

 
Why are you defending illegals at all....don't bother answering we know the answer Lefty.
Where have I defended them retunrubt thr illegals Bicks? I have clearly said it's the USA's right to return illegals as is the Columbian's right to do it a humane way.

Can only assume you are OK with inhumane treatment of people or once again failed to actually read what I have posted!

Perhaps you could help out EB as to why the USA would free 4 supposed terrorists.
 
Where have I defended them Bicks? I have clearly said it's the USA's right to return illegals as is the Columbian's right to do it a humane way.

Can only assume you are OK with inhumane treatment of people or once again failed to actually read what I have posted!
Can you point me to where in the very very short time The Trump Administration has been in control where these inhumane practices have taken place?

Removing illegal immigrants that have no right being there is inhumane?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Can you point me to where in the very very short time The Trump Administration has been in control where these inhumane practices have taken place?

Removing illegal immigrants that have no right being there is inhumane?
Shackling them on military planes. Was in the article is posted in the international thread. I'll tag you in.
 
Where have I defended them retunrubt thr illegals Bicks? I have clearly said it's the USA's right to return illegals as is the Columbian's right to do it a humane way.

Can only assume you are OK with inhumane treatment of people or once again failed to actually read what I have posted!

Perhaps you could help out EB as to why the USA would free 4 supposed terrorists.
Send them to Gitmo so the next Biden and Obama will release them. Good thinking.
 
Shackling them on military planes. Was in the article is posted in the international thread. I'll tag you in.
Why wouldn't they be shacked, would you sooner a US soldier used force if they try anything on?
 
Send them to Gitmo so the next Biden and Obama will release them. Good thinking.
So why have the USA locked up many of the most dangerous criminals, but OK to release these 4? Can't see the contradiction...
 
Why wouldn't they be shacked, would you sooner a US soldier used force if they try anything on?
Australia & other Westen Countries don't shackle illegals when they return them on passenger flights... & the accepting county don't usually have an issue.

Why do you fabour inhumane methods?
 
So why have the USA locked up many of the most dangerous criminals, but OK to release these 4? Can't see the contradiction...
You do realize they are Illegals and criminal. Not just 4 that I used as a quick example. Have a look who Tom Homan said he is prioritizing. You are just grandstanding.
 
Australia & other Westen Countries don't shackle illegals when they return them on passenger flights... & the accepting county don't usually have an issue.

Why do you fabour inhumane methods?
Yeah those in control of these illegal criminals on these flights should give them all a hug and sit in circles singing Kumbaya...yeah OK.
 
Yeah those in control of these illegal criminals on these flights should give them all a hug and sit in circles singing Kumbaya...yeah OK.
No, but the shackling is unnecessary as just put them on the plane & send them back.

Says more about you than you think shacking is appropriate.
 
No, but the shackling is unnecessary as just put them on the plane & send them back.

Says more about you than you think shacking is appropriate.
It's almost as much protection for them as it is for those charged with returning them to their country of origin. If shackling is the worse thing that ever happens to them they haven't got too much to worry about.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'm sure violent criminals will be well behaved on a flight.

1737939419856-png.2212319
Con Air is awesome. :thumbsu:

giphy.gif
 
No, but the shackling is unnecessary as just put them on the plane & send them back.

Says more about you than you think shacking is appropriate.
Clever taking it over to the other thread btw where you're surrounded with your lefty mates...not so keen when you're not surrounded by your lefty brethren hey.
 
Clever taking it over to the other thread btw where you're surrounded with your lefty mates...not so keen when you're not surrounded by your lefty brethren hey.
Unlike you I don't disappear when it gets tough.

Shackling is inhumane & unnecessary for normal illegals.

But you will never get it.
 
Unlike you I don't disappear when it gets tough.

Shackling is inhumane.

But you will never get it.
Weak as water Lefty or you'd have continued the debate here but no not supported so much by your lefty mates in this thread.
 
Why wouldn't they be shacked, would you sooner a US soldier used force if they try anything on?

Australia & other Westen Countries don't shackle illegals when they return them on passenger flights... & the accepting county don't usually have an issue.

Why do you fabour inhumane methods?
My understanding of the shackling is for GPS monitoring.
 
They're ankle bracelets mate not legcuffs

Usually used to monitor prisoners out on bail/parole etc.
They have used this in the past.

The Homeland Security Department is experimenting with a new way to track immigrant families caught crossing the border illegally before being released into the US: GPS-enabled ankle bracelets.

 

Remove this Banner Ad

US Election

Back
Top