NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're literally lurking on a Conspiracy subforum, where you regularly contribute.

Strange way to ignore nutjobs.



Qanon Trump lovers are far from inconsequential. They're cheering on (and contributing to) the democratic backsliding of the US Republic towards an authoritarian regime with a right wing populist leader (and Epsteins best friend, and sex offender), who is literally above the law.

Which is of course hilarious, because they're conspiracy nutters who seem to be really worried about governments seizing power by virtue of criminal conspiracies, Epstein and his mates, and governments being above the law.

Trump is OK though. They like him. He gets a pass.
I enjoy this thread as it can have some good banter.

I don't take it seriously and treat it like SRP lite.

And if I could put you on ignore I would.
 
I enjoy this thread as it can have some good banter.

I don't take it seriously and treat it like SRP lite.

You dont take it seriously, but FlowersByIrene BlueE Lebbo73 and hundreds of thousands if not millions in the USA do.

And they're cheering on a march to literal Armageddon.

You may not realize it, but an emboldened Trump, free from Criminal liability, and who got away with attempting to overturn a lawful election, might be a really bad thing for the world.

Surely you can see how that might be a bad thing for everyone right?

And if I could put you on ignore I would.

1720169368061.png
 
You dont take it seriously, but FlowersByIrene BlueE Lebbo73 and hundreds of thousands if not millions in the USA do.

And they're cheering on a march to literal Armageddon.

You may not realize it, but an emboldened Trump, free from Criminal liability, and who got away with attempting to overturn a lawful election, might be a really bad thing for the world.

Surely you can see how that might be a bad thing for everyone right?



View attachment 2039329
You said in another thread that this was not true.
Thats a poor dissent.

The majority were not asserting that a President could do any of those things.

Unless you consider 'murdering a political rival' to be within the scope of the Presidents official constitutional duties (and it's not).
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You dont take it seriously, but FlowersByIrene BlueE Lebbo73 and hundreds of thousands if not millions in the USA do.

And they're cheering on a march to literal Armageddon.

You may not realize it, but an emboldened Trump, free from Criminal liability, and who got away with attempting to overturn a lawful election, might be a really bad thing for the world.

Surely you can see how that might be a bad thing for everyone right?



View attachment 2039329
If you truly think Trump getting in will be literal Armageddon then it is really you who is cooked.
 
You said in another thread that this was not true.

No, I didnt.

The President is shielded from Criminal liability for official acts.

The SCOTUS was silent as to whether conspiring to overturn the 2020 election was an official act or not.

It did say that his discussions with the VP, Justice department etc are all immune and inadmissible (regardless of what he was saying), but it remitted the question of what was 'official' and what was 'unoffical' back to the lower court.
 
If you truly think Trump getting in will be literal Armageddon then it is really you who is cooked.

He's a right wing populist who has openly stated he intends to 'suspend the constitution' when he gets into power, who orchestrated a conspiracy to ignore the results of a democratic election and remain in power unlawfully, who willfully spreads conspiracies and lies, and appoints cronies, family members and so forth in positions of power, offering them literal pardons when he leaves office.

America is democratically backsliding, and fast, towards something more resembling an authoritarian dictatorship.

Putting political bias to one side for a second, how on earth can you say the above is a good thing for the world, the USA or Australia?
 
You dont take it seriously, but FlowersByIrene BlueE Lebbo73 and hundreds of thousands if not millions in the USA do.

And they're cheering on a march to literal Armageddon.

You may not realize it, but an emboldened Trump, free from Criminal liability, and who got away with attempting to overturn a lawful election, might be a really bad thing for the world.

Surely you can see how that might be a bad thing for everyone right?



View attachment 2039329
How many times were you labeled a drama queen in your younger days?
If he really was Epstein’s best mate, the MSM would’ve been all over it years ago.
 
No, I didnt.

The President is shielded from Criminal liability for official acts.

The SCOTUS was silent as to whether conspiring to overturn the 2020 election was an official act or not.

It did say that his discussions with the VP, Justice department etc are all immune and inadmissible (regardless of what he was saying), but it remitted the question of what was 'official' and what was 'unoffical' back to the lower court.
Questioning a fraudulent election, even if it wasn’t fraudulent, is not conspiring to overturn the results of an election.
 
He's a right wing populist who has openly stated he intends to 'suspend the constitution' when he gets into power, who orchestrated a conspiracy to ignore the results of a democratic election and remain in power unlawfully, who willfully spreads conspiracies and lies, and appoints cronies, family members and so forth in positions of power, offering them literal pardons when he leaves office.

America is democratically backsliding, and fast, towards something more resembling an authoritarian dictatorship.

Putting political bias to one side for a second, how on earth can you say the above is a good thing for the world, the USA or Australia?
You ain’t cooked, you’re barbecued!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You're twisting yourself in mental knots again to defend a child rapist.

That's the truth.
You're better than that Mofra.

However, you wouldn't recognise the truth if it slapped you across the face

Getting desperately triggered after the claims have already been discredited and posted on the Trump 18 thread, by journalists investigating the claims, to the extent they seriously doubted this person existed.

It was the end of an incredibly strange case that featured an anonymous plaintiff who had refused almost all requests for interviews, two anonymous corroborating witnesses whom no one in the press had spoken to, and a couple of seriously shady characters — with an anti-Trump agenda and a penchant for drama — who had aggressively shopped the story around to media outlets for over a year.

Those shady characters — a former reality-TV producer who calls himself Al Taylor and a Never Trump conservative activist named Steve Baer — had been mostly unsuccessful in getting the media to bite.

There are a few very good reasons for that, which the Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim succinctly summed up: Taylor and Baer have been really sketchy about the whole thing, and since the accuser is anonymous, journalists can’t do anything to verify her claims.

The only journalist who has actually interviewed Johnson, Emily Shugerman at Revelist, came away confused and even doubting whether Johnson really exists.
 
The Democrats are in such a sad state.

After the debate, they also can't gaslight the public anymore.

The vegetable in the White House doesn't possess a functioning brain, and even rusted ons
are questioning whether it is a good idea to vote for a bloke who doesn't know what day it is.

They really have no options. Cackling Kamala is an A Grade space cadet. Biden is brain dead.

Not sure who else they have with leadership qualities.

Rachel Levine??


Admiral_Rachel_L._Levine.jpg
Well Rachel did lead all those COVID positive patients from hospital back to their aged care homes.

We'll know it's over when the Democrats start asking for the Hur video tapes.

In the meantime the media are rallying, Biden is "sharp as a tack"

Special mention to Dr Jill at 5.47 (in kindy teacher voice) "Joe you did really well, you answered every question!" (Joey insanely grinning!)

 
He's a right wing populist who has openly stated he intends to 'suspend the constitution' when he gets into power, who orchestrated a conspiracy to ignore the results of a democratic election and remain in power unlawfully, who willfully spreads conspiracies and lies, and appoints cronies, family members and so forth in positions of power, offering them literal pardons when he leaves office.

America is democratically backsliding, and fast, towards something more resembling an authoritarian dictatorship.

Putting political bias to one side for a second, how on earth can you say the above is a good thing for the world, the USA or Australia?
You do realise Trump currently isn't in power?

The way you guys have built Trump up into the devil incarnate is utterly bizarre and really unhealthy. He is just another American politician. He has literally fried your brains but that is what hating on something so much, so hard, for so will do to people.

He has literally changed you all as people and I hope once he finally moves on you guys can recover and find peace again.
 
The establishment is more powerful than any president. Trump will be able to do stuff all except cut taxes.
Well, he certainly couldn't build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it (imagine being stupid enough to fall for that!)
He did however throw millions off public health insurance last time he was POTUS with the repeal of the ACA.

But I do take your last point - he did indeed cut taxes for billionaires.
 
I'm reading what you said in another thread. I even liked the post because you said it was a poor dissent and that the majority was not asserting what was said in the dissent. The dissent was stating hyperbolic criminal behaviour. Now you are saying Trump is free from criminal liability for anything. You may not realize it, but an emboldened Trump, free from Criminal liability, and who got away with attempting to overturn a lawful election, might be a really bad thing for the world. No mention of official or unofficial acts in your statement. It was more hyperbole from you. Everyone that can read a judgement knows that it was sent back to decide official v unofficial acts, only the hyperbolic are saying that this means he can do anything. You should be a lot clearer in with your hyperbole because when you say someone is free from criminal liability then it is safe to assume you are saying they are free from criminal liability.

This isn't even a gotcha because I liked the original post and was stunned that you posted what you did. Actually shocked that you didn't go with the hyperbole. Did last long though.

Anyway awaiting the deny, deny, deny until I am sicking of re-posting your words.
At this moment, I'm reminded of the sage Harris, when she said "what can be, unburdened by what has been"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top