- Dec 27, 2016
- 29,370
- 61,837
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #99
Here is US Politics Pt 2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The accent thing is very insidious. It highlights her true nature as a charlatan and a deceitful evil.
To borrow from Malifice's playbook:
"Uhmmmm ack-tua-ally, they're not 'actual marxists', no one thinks Kamala is a true believer in Karl Marx's theory of marxism. She's just be unwitttttttingly exposed to marxist ideologies and doesn't even know that she's spouting the same tired marxist talking points that have circled the drain of society since the 30s".
Before you saw the evidence you were singing a different tune. The thing is though, that the story had already been verified before you weighed in on the topic. I think you need to "Do Your Own Research" in the future.Not at all mate, I literally said Flowers was right in this case (meaning I was wrong).
I was presented with evidence from a source, with direct quotes from the party involved, from something resembling an organisation with actual editorial oversight/policies and I accepted it. Its really the main difference between how I operate and how you guys do.
Now, that doesn't mean Flowers' insta source is reliable overall - broken clock etc. The bloke seems to be one of those special units who believes Harris AI'd her rally crowds, fair indicator as to his overall engagement with reality there.
Before you saw the evidence you were singing a different tune. The thing is though, that the story had already been verified before you weighed in on the topic. I think you need to "Do Your Own Research" in the future.
Marxism from a right wing American politician point of view.To borrow from Malifice's playbook:
"Uhmmmm ack-tua-ally, they're not 'actual marxists', no one thinks Kamala is a true believer in Karl Marx's theory of marxism. She's just be unwitttttttingly exposed to marxist ideologies and doesn't even know that she's spouting the same tired marxist talking points that have circled the drain of society since the 30s".
Correct, after having a quick scan of that account's other content it didn't look like something to be relied on, the guy seems pretty cooked. Kamala AI crowd videos etc.Before you saw the evidence you were singing a different tune.
Wait - you're criticising me for accepting verified data I wasn't aware of, and actually changing my opinion based on that? I'd really suggest you try a similar approach some time lolThe thing is though, that the story had already been verified before you weighed in on the topic. I think you need to "Do Your Own Research" in the future.
criticising you for going off half cocked. There was nothing wrong with the video posted, if you want to get into cooked media don't post or accept anything from the msm either, they all publish bs from time to time.Correct, after having a quick scan of that account's other content it didn't look like something to be relied on, the guy seems pretty cooked. Kamala AI crowd videos etc.
Wait - you're criticising me for accepting verified data I wasn't aware of, and actually changing my opinion based on that? I'd really suggest you try a similar approach some time lol
You really have to stop making my points for me
Lol this is ironic.
Having a "side" blinds you to anything that isn't endorsed by that side. It removes your ability to consider any subject on its own merit. Once you pick a side you lose your ability to think.To the FlowersByIrene , Lebbo73 and zill's of the forum.
Is there any poster on this forum from 'our' side (Mof, Burbs, Ghost, Darren, Yards out etc) that you think is being honest/genuine but are just misguided or brainwashed?
And.
What would it take for you to trust someone from 'our' side?
Absolutely.Having a "side" blinds you to anything that isn't endorsed by that side. It removes your ability to consider any subject on its own merit. Once you pick a side you lose your ability to think.
They're are studies that suggest people rarely change their minds even when presented with facts. We now exist in the post-fact era so changing opinions is now even more difficult.Absolutely.
And it's so easy to fall into every new issue your 'team' is supporting, for whatever reason. I've done it many times but have become better at catching myself over time.
But it's also just as blinding and thoughtless to believe that your position on certain divisive issues (that are splitting the Western world) doesn't 'place' you on one side or another, regardless of your intent or how you reached your position.
I want my positions to be challenged with evidence, facts, logic and a structured path showing the layout.
And I want to challenge other people's positions in the same way.
So, why doesn't it happen?
I don't really understand the question, I don't think I would 'trust' anyone online, what am I 'trusting' in them.To the FlowersByIrene , Lebbo73 and zill's of the forum.
Is there any poster on this forum from 'our' side (Mof, Burbs, Ghost, Darren, Yards out etc) that you think is being honest/genuine but are just misguided or brainwashed?
And.
What would it take for you to trust someone from 'our' side?
As in, is there anything I or anyone could ever do that could prove themselves enough to you, that you would trust them and believe them, even if it was uncomfortable or in conflict with one or your fundamental beliefs?
As it turned out, no. There was plenty wrong with other videos on that account, which I used to make a determination that I later admitted was wrong once additional info was supplied.criticising you for going off half cocked. There was nothing wrong with the video posted
As compared to cooker sources like the one Flowers posted, who publish BS most of the time.if you want to get into cooked media don't post or accept anything from the msm either, they all publish bs from time to time.
Start supporting TrumpWhat would it take for you to trust someone from 'our' side?
As in, is there anything I or anyone could ever do that could prove themselves enough to you, that you would trust them and believe them, even if it was uncomfortable or in conflict with one or your fundamental beliefs?
Uncanny description of FlowersByIrene hereHaving a "side" blinds you to anything that isn't endorsed by that side. It removes your ability to consider any subject on its own merit. Once you pick a side you lose your ability to think.
Yep, just like he locked Hillary upLooks like the great man will be locking up election criminals for crimes dating back to 2020.
Those who didn’t commit any election crimes have nothing to fear.
Of course, the establishment is shitting itself.
Why look at his other videos when you could have just googled the story? I agree with you that it was an outrageous and unreasonable approach.As it turned out, no. There was plenty wrong with other videos on that account, which I used to make a determination that I later admitted was wrong once additional info was supplied.
What an outrageous and unreasonable approach eh?
As compared to cooker sources like the one Flowers posted, who publish BS most of the time.
Why not link to a more credible source?Why look at his other videos when you could have just googled the story? I agree with you that it was an outrageous and unreasonable approach.