NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

The 2024 US presidential election is on Tuesday, 5 November 2024. The winner will serve a term of four years in the White House, starting in January 2025.

 

[Mofra]

Musk Derangement Syndrome. That's the only explanation for your current escape from reality.

Ah yes deflect when caught out.

The only way the cult even exists is easily led people embracing conspiracy theories and denying reality.

That's why there is so much funny weird stuff on this thread (submarine tunnels! 4D chess!)
in between mindless cheerleading and pretending those billionaires really do care about regular, decent people.

 

[Mofra]

So it's confirmed. You HAVE completely lost the plot.

My post #3,593 didn't include any Twitter posts from Greg Price. My post #3,573 did. The only comments I focused on in the latter post (#3,593) were the comments at the end of the article you provided. If you wanted to take issue with me including Greg Price's twitter comment, then you should have included it in your first reply to #3,573 or quoted #3,573 again so I didn't have to question your sanity.

It's part of the same quote, just sourced.

I have provided multiple sources and you're sticking to a single Twitter quote - and nobody except for the most rabbit-holed cult members consider Twitter a reliable source for anything.

The revised bill excluded provisions for kids with cancer - even a number of fellow Republicans can admit this. It's why they rushed through a seperate standalone bill after public backlash.

This is how far you're gone - but I suspect personal awareness isn't a strength of the most dedicated cult members.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Hear hear.

That particular poster has never recovered from having to admit Biden is a racist. Conducts itself like a child.

FK how many sleeps until the great man is officially 47?

You're still salty about that exchange because it was when everyone here was left in no doubt that you are a coward.

You had the chance to show you're not just a lightweight Trump cheerleader, but you lacked the balls to do so.

 

[LuvtheKangas]

Only proving his point about being unable to win the argument so playing the man instead. We'd expect such crude obfuscations and trollery on the lowbrow boards like Bay13 or SRP, but this board is for the exchange of ideas among intellectuals engaged in civil discourse. Kindly elevate your standards to reflect this expectation!

You ignored the bit about Lebbo playing the man in that very post.

But hey, we all know that you don't care about being hypocritical.

 

[EasternTiger]

The cultist MSNBC approved narrative word of the day is ‘Oligarchy’

 

[Soldier Of Misfortune]

conservatives on bigfooty whenever someone mentions Marjorie Taylor Green's comments about multiple sexual misconducts not yet leaked from Republicans:

 

[Ghost Patrol]

conservatives on bigfooty whenever someone mentions Marjorie Taylor Green's comments about multiple sexual misconducts not yet leaked from Republicans:
View attachment 2192541

EasternTurtle

 

[zill]

The only way the cult even exists is easily led people embracing conspiracy theories and denying reality.

Denying reality. Something i'm sure you'd never do.

 

[Soldier Of Misfortune]

QAnon Cult basic programming.

 

[EasternTiger]

You're still salty about that exchange because it was when everyone here was left in no doubt that you are a coward.

You had the chance to show you're not just a lightweight Trump cheerleader, but you lacked the balls to do so.

I got you to admit your side is racist.

You have never been the same

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

It's part of the same quote, just sourced.

No it's not. A multitude of people have made the same point expressed in a variety of different ways. Are you trying to say they're all pseudonyms of 'Trump staffer' Greg Price?

I have provided multiple sources

One MSM article and a link to comments from a Democratic congresswoman. Wow.

and you're sticking to a single Twitter quote

You chose to focus on the Greg Price tweet. Because you thought that pointing out he was a Trump staffer would invalidate it. Why you didn't think the partisan comments of the Democratic Congresswoman should also be given less weight when you used that as part of your 'multiple sources' post I can only guess at. TBH, I didn't even notice when I posted Robby Starbuck's tweet that it included Greg Price's tweet quoted at the bottom.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

The revised bill excluded provisions for kids with cancer -

Kids Cancer research. Did you miss https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/us-politics-pt-3.1387143/post-86353486

Or did I not provide enough sources for you?

In that case, here's another.

‘Bargaining chip’: Trump allies dismantle Liz Warren’s claim GOP blocked childhood cancer research

Trump allies are dismantling a Democratic narrative promoted by Sen. Elizabeth Warren that the GOP blocked childhood cancer funding, despite passing a funding bill months ago.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Mofra]

Denying reality. Something i'm sure you'd never do.

Didn't you say out loud that maybe Trump was only with Epstein as a double agent?

 

[Mofra]

No it's not. A multitude of people have made the same point expressed in a variety of different ways. Are you trying to say they're all pseudonyms of 'Trump staffer' Greg Price?






One MSM article and a link to comments from a Democratic congresswoman. Wow.






You chose to focus on the Greg Price tweet. Because you thought that pointing out he was a Trump staffer would invalidate it. Why you didn't think the partisan comments of the Democratic Congresswoman should also be given less weight when you used that as part of your 'multiple sources' post I can only guess at. TBH, I didn't even notice when I posted Robby Starbuck's tweet that it included Greg Price's tweet quoted at the bottom.

I posted multiple articles. They're the sources, not quotes from democrats. I even posted a link to the bill itself.

I don't have any larger crayons for the CTs here. Facts clearly don't matter to the cult and you're clearly a card carrying member.
Merry Christmas.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Ah yes deflect when caught out.

Caught out? What, because I didn't agree with your characterization of Republicans wanting to defund kids cancer research or your description of Elon as President Musk?

 

[Mofra]

Kids Cancer research. Did you miss https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/us-politics-pt-3.1387143/post-86353486

Or did I not provide enough sources for you?

In that case, here's another.

‘Bargaining chip’: Trump allies dismantle Liz Warren’s claim GOP blocked childhood cancer research

Trump allies are dismantling a Democratic narrative promoted by Sen. Elizabeth Warren that the GOP blocked childhood cancer funding, despite passing a funding bill months ago.

www.foxnews.com

There was a later article I posted which showed this as BS and out of date.

The bill itself had bipartisan support until Elon and his servant Trump killed it off. It was then reintroduced with a range of original finding measures excluded, including paediatric cancer funding.

You're going around in circles trying to justify cruelty.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

There was a later article I posted which showed this as BS and out of date.

The bill itself had bipartisan support until Elon and his servant Trump killed it off. It was then reintroduced with a range of original finding measures excluded, including paediatric cancer funding.

You're going around in circles trying to justify cruelty.

Just to be clear is the 'later article' you're referring to here the one you provided in your response to Flowers By Irene at post #3,598 ?

 

[Mofra]

Just to be clear is the 'later article' you're referring to here the one you provided in your response to Flowers By Irene at post #3,598 ?

Yes, that's one of them. It follows a reasonable timeline of the events. It even notes the parties came to an agreement until it was quashed by the duo of billionaires

It's much like the border bill earlier in 2024 - where parties finally reached an agreement, then Trump ordered it quashed for political expediency.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Yes, that's one of them.

You posted another article that proved #3,637 to be "BS and out of date"?

Better link me to that then because the article you provided to Flowers By Irene was published at least 48 hours prior to the Fox article I just posted and almost 48 hours before the tweet I posted at #3,594.

 

[Mofra]

You posted another article that proved #3,637 to be "BS and out of date"?

Better link me to that then because the article you provided to Flowers By Irene was published at least 48 hours prior to the Fox article I just posted and almost 48 hours before the tweet I posted at #3,594.

A Tweet and an a discussion piece by opinion givers (noting Fox, legally, classify their broadcasts as 'entertainment' and not 'news') is hardly a solid rebuttal. I've already posted a number of times that Twitter is unreliable at best.

The Fox article (the written portion) at least has the sense to credit Elon and Trump jointly killing the bill. Which they did. Unequivocally.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

A Tweet and an a discussion piece by opinion givers (noting Fox, legally, classify their broadcasts as 'entertainment' and not 'news') is hardly a solid rebuttal. I've already posted a number of times that Twitter is unreliable at best.

The Fox article (the written portion) at least has the sense to credit Elon and Trump jointly killing the bill. Which they did. Unequivocally.

You accused me of deflecting before. Why are you deflecting here? You said you had posted another article that proved #3,637 to be "BS and out of date". Please provide it. Or were you, how shall we put it, mistaken?

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Surely he didn't sit on it for 9 months to score cheap political points later? So cruel. Holding up future research funding for kids with cancer for his own political schemes.

 

[Soldier Of Misfortune]

Surely he didn't sit on it for 9 months to score cheap political points later? So cruel. Holding up future research funding for kids with cancer for his own political schemes.

so there's two lots of scumbags? This guy and then the ones who stopped it?

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Surely he didn't sit on it for 9 months to score cheap political points later? So cruel. Holding up future research funding for kids with cancer for his own political schemes.

So, future funding. What year does it kick off and why did Elon Trump kill it?

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

So, future funding. What year does it kick off and why did Elon Trump kill it?

I'm presuming it's future funding. Schumer could have passed it in March after the House passed it 384-4 and it then went to the Senate.