NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

zill said:
How many of these are tv stations?
Click to expand...
2. Whose viewership combined with Fox's would be roughly equivalent tv viewership on the left. Still oh so unfair though, somehow, don't let anyone tell you otherwise! ;)

Fox News does eat a lot of lunches in right wing media - I assume we're still free market kinda guys in this thread yeah? Or are we not so much anymore, now that dear leader has decreed tariffs the way of the future? :tearsofjoy:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Bostonian said:
It's the ones who cry about Fox are the loudest and worst at bleating.
Click to expand...
Bostonian said:
One tv station Biggest cable news org on the planet plus another 2 tv stations (Newsmax and OAN) to the right.

Multiple the other way.
Click to expand...
Just an amazing sequence of posts here :tearsofjoy:

Have also applied multiple corrections for you :thumbsu:
 
HitTheNailOnTheHead said:
You have the hide to speak of disingenuity earlier in the thread and then you type out that utter tripe? The story wasn't pretending to say what you have twisted it into. The article simply points out the cousins were supporting Trump and the brother wholeheartedly disagreed with Tim's policies. No mention of a dislike of Tim personally. Just give up the semantic dance for once.
Click to expand...

The Walz Clan have most likely been burnt by one of Cousin Tim's multiple misstatements. Who would know him better than his family? Maybe one of them organised a meet up in Tiananmen Square or later on in Afghanistan, but cousin Tim never showed. The US voters agreed with his family's assessment.

The real question is, will he ever be seen again? Maybe Harris/Walz 2028 or 2032?
 
skipper kelly said:
The Walz Clan have most likely been burnt by one of Cousin Tim's multiple misstatements. Who would know him better than his family? Maybe one of them organised a meet up in Tiananmen Square or later on in Afghanistan, but cousin Tim never showed. The US voters agreed with his family's assessment.

The real question is, will he ever be seen again? Maybe Harris/Walz 2028 or 2032?
Click to expand...

Gwen Walz/AOC 2028.
 
zill said:
How many of these are tv stations?
Click to expand...

Stokes, Packer and Murdoch collectively own most of the TV stations in Australia.

You must be sick of their Left-wing bias.

Of the remaining stations, (the ABC and SBS) they have a board appointed and are legislatively required to provide an even voice (this is why you see the panel on Q&A being split between conservatives and lefties).

It's also why you don't see a 'leftie' version of Andrew Bolt ranting about current events from a biased and inflammatory position anywhere (including on the ABC).
 
After appointing Big Pharma and Big Tech billionaires to run the economy, Trump has now appointed an alleged sex trafficker as Attorney General:

Billionaires, Fox News personalities, and staunch loyalists. These are the people president-elect Donald Trump is choosing to run the United States as part of his incoming 2025 administration.

The biggest surprise so far came last Wednesday, local time, when the president-elect announced Gaetz — a congressman from Florida — was his pick for the country's highest legal office.

John Bolton, a veteran conservative consultant and diplomat who's served in every Republican administration since Ronald Regan's in 1985, led the critiques.

"Gaetz is not only totally incompetent for this job, he doesn't have the character," he told CNN.

"He is a person of moral turpitude."
Click to expand...

And:

Gaetz has been the subject of multiple investigations by the house Ethics Committee — a bipartisan group comprising five Republicans and five Democrats.

In Gaetz's case, the Ethics Committee has been investigating whether he was part of a plot that led to the sex trafficking of a 17-year-old girl, along with multiple other allegations, including whether he engaged in illicit drug use.
Click to expand...

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11...-matt-gaetz-could-be-a-loyalty-test/104609292

Promoting 2 billionaires, and an alleged sex trafficker.

When are we draining the swamp of these 'elites' again?

Lol.

Just lol.
 
Satan said:
2 weeks
Click to expand...

Is that before or after ne 'negotiates' a peace deal in Ukraine, the terms of which include Putin annexing the eastern half of the country, and giving Putin literally everything he invaded the country to get?

Trumpers on here bemoaning 'elites', 'paedos' and 'oligarchs'.

Nek minute Trump (an elite) appoints oligarchs, elites and (alleged) paedos to his cabinet.

On some ****ing level the Trumpers on here must be thinking 'hang on a minute' surely?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Malifice said:
Is that before or after ne 'negotiates' a peace deal in Ukraine, the terms of which include Putin annexing the eastern half of the country, and giving Putin literally everything he invaded the country to get?

Trumpers on here bemoaning 'elites', 'paedos' and 'oligarchs'.

Nek minute Trump (an elite) appoints oligarchs, elites and (alleged) paedos to his cabinet.

On some ****ing level the Trumpers on here must be thinking 'hang on a minute' surely?
Click to expand...
It's still 2 months before trump is sworn in, and these nominations also need to be certified. Untwist your knickers, enjoy Christmas and New year, you'll have plenty of time to clutch your pearls in the future
 
Malifice said:
Are the three of them (Musk, Ramasawy and Gaetz) 'elites'?

Yes or No will suffice.

If 'Yes', do you agree that Trump clearly has no plan on going after 'the Elites' at all?
Click to expand...
Not sure about musk, he doesn't seem particularly popular. I don't think you will have to worry about him for long. Once he cuts spending and redirects it towards space programs, he will rocket off to mars, never to be heard from again. 🚀🧑‍🚀
 
Lebbo73 said:
You fellas wouldn’t be immune to making false accusations now would you? 🙄
Click to expand...

Not immune, but I bet you won't be able to find one on this site from me.
 
Malifice said:
Stokes, Packer and Murdoch collectively own most of the TV stations in Australia.

You must be sick of their Left-wing bias.

Of the remaining stations, (the ABC and SBS) they have a board appointed and are legislatively required to provide an even voice (this is why you see the panel on Q&A being split between conservatives and lefties).

It's also why you don't see a 'leftie' version of Andrew Bolt ranting about current events from a biased and inflammatory position anywhere (including on the ABC).
Click to expand...

The ABC is basically a left leaning greenie commentariat and has been from about when Whitlam came to power and unashamedly replaced the entire board with supporters of the Labor Party. Wasn't Guthrie sacked for not tackling it's bias? Anyway, the only people who can't perceive the ABC's bias are people who share it's worldview.
 
HitTheNailOnTheHead said:
The ABC is basically a left leaning greenie commentariat
Click to expand...

Its the only station in Australia that is legislatively bound to be fair to all political parties.

Every panel on the show literally has conservatives on it (which is a legal requirement).

Which show on the ABC do you assert is 'leftist propaganda'? Name one.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top