NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

The 2024 US presidential election is on Tuesday, 5 November 2024. The winner will serve a term of four years in the White House, starting in January 2025.

 

[Soldier Of Misfortune]

looks like Republicans need to start referring to 'good illegals' and 'bad illegals'.

 

[bourbons]

And then you have the garden variety conservatives in wide eyed wonderment about the state of their party rank and file, not paying a whole lot of attention the last few years I guess

****ing gold

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Well yeah of course it did

I'm familiar with "take as gospel", but not just referencing books of the new testament as some kind of indication someone will believe something at face value, bizarre.

I'll explain it for you then.

When I said you treat the Ethics Committee report with the same veneration as a born again Christian does Matthew, Mark, Luke & John (despite that committee interviewing the same witnesses disregarded by the DOJ) I was meaning you take it as gospel. You believe it to be true IOW.

 

[bourbons]

I'll explain it for you then.

When I said you treat the Ethics Committee report with the same veneration as a born again Christian does Matthew, Mark, Luke & John (despite that committee interviewing the same witnesses disregarded by the DOJ) I was meaning you take it as gospel. You believe it to be true IOW.

Yes mate, I'm with you now

Still unsure why you referenced bible books instead of just saying "take it as gospel". If you look at the clarifying screenshot you posted, the search term isn't "Mathew Mark Luke and John", it's "accept/take as gospel" - you know, the actual saying rather than some other one you seem to have just invented?

Not that it makes much difference either way - you're implying the ethics report is unreliable or biased against Gaetz. That would be the report produced by a bipartisan ethics committee chaired by a Republican

 

[Mofra]

Geez I had Musk to at least survive a few months into the admin, will be removed from the inner circle before inauguration at this rate

Do you think he'll promote Vice President Trump into the top job any time soon?

 

[Mofra]

looks like Republicans need to start referring to 'good illegals' and 'bad illegals'.

'Core' and 'non-core' immigrants?

 

[Soldier Of Misfortune]

'Core' and 'non-core' immigrants?

"promised to vote republican illegals" and "bad illegals"

 

[EasternTiger]

What I like about Republicans is they are willing to debate important topics to hash out a good workable solution, even if it means they occasionally disagree with each; unlike the Democrat lemmings.

The important thing to note is your typical IT employee is a leftie.

Tech employees are much more liberal than their employers — at least as far as the candidates they support

Corporate political action committees aren’t as motivated by partisan politics as individuals tend to be.

www.vox.com

We can replace the leftie tech worker with skilled immigrants.

Of course, Homan will deport all the illegal immigrants that have criminal records, low skilled, will vote democrat anyway etc.

This is a win/win imho.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Yes mate, I'm with you now

Still unsure why you referenced bible books instead of just saying "take it as gospel".

Really? I thought it would be obvious. What are those books also known as?

Not that it makes much difference either way - you're implying the ethics report is unreliable or biased against Gaetz.

I'm implying you think it's all true.

That would be the report produced by a bipartisan ethics committee chaired by a Republican

Chaired by a Republican who along with other members of the committee dissented to the decision to release the report because they felt that releasing the report would open the committee to undue criticism and be viewed by some as an attempt “to weaponize the Committee’s process.”

“We believe that operating outside the jurisdictional bounds set forth by House Rules and Committee standards, especially when making public disclosures, is a dangerous departure with potentially catastrophic consequences”.

He is absolutely spot on. Especially when you consider they were releasing a report that relies so heavily on testimony from discredited witnesses.

 

[Satan]

Really? I thought it would be obvious. What are those books also known as?




I'm implying you think it's all true.



Chaired by a Republican who along with other members of the committee dissented to the decision to release the report because they felt that releasing the report would open the committee to undue criticism and be viewed by some as an attempt “to weaponize the Committee’s process.”

“We believe that operating outside the jurisdictional bounds set forth by House Rules and Committee standards, especially when making public disclosures, is a dangerous departure with potentially catastrophic consequences”.

He is absolutely spot on. Especially when you consider they were releasing a report that relies so heavily on testimony from discredited witnesses.

Unlike comers star witness

Key Republican source, accused of lying about the Bidens, pleads guilty

Alexander Smirnov may not be a household name, but his new guilty plea represents a stunning fiasco for some prominent Republicans in Congress.

www.msnbc.com

 

[CM86]

Great news again today.

Congrats to E. Jean Carroll. This is a victory for all survivors of SA.
As hard as it is to come forward, it's even harder to get justice.
So it's a really amazing thing to see results like this.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-carroll-lawsuit-defamation-trial-78e4196024539653a6de492312770ff2

A federal appeals court on Monday upheld a jury’s finding in a civil case that Donald Trump sexually abused a columnist in an upscale department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.​

​

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a written opinion upholding the $5 million award that the Manhattan jury granted to E. Jean Carroll for defamation and sexual abuse.​

 

[CM86]

All true.

Why anyone would be confused about team Biden attempting to mitigate it a few weeks out from an election I'm not sure. Its not a tickling contest, its a presidential election they were trying to win - their response would have been similar if the allegations were true or not (turns out they weren't, on the available evidence 4 years later).

There is no evidence, ever, that the Biden administration, ever, attempted to force those social media companies to censor stories about the laptop. Or anything. Ever.

There IS evidence of Trump and the Trump administration attempting to force social media to censor people.


So, Biden DIDN'T do it. Trump DID do it.

But for some reason, the conversation is still about Biden censorship?

I think it's why there is some people not feeling great about Trump winning.
Unfulfilled.
So much of their beliefs and positions kind of required him not to win the election. He needed to be a martyr. So, what can they invest themselves into now?
It's left a bit of a hole in their lives, I think.

 

[CM86]

Oh I don't doubt that the "never discussed business with Hunter's associates" is a lie (you guys care about politicians lying now do you? )

Its the lack of evidence of corruption and the GOP willingness to just make shit up and actually try to manufacture some official legal action on the back of it that we're talking about.

Smart move Homer Simpsoning back into the hedge on the Charlottesville very fine people by the way

And it's a stupid lie. But it had to be said, due to the dishonesty of the media and MAGA.

Of course he's had conversations with his son about all levels of business and associates.
In fact, no doubt he's leant on things or people to help his son get into positions he didn't deserve.

But what's missing is showing that Biden used his positions of power to influence or take advantage of situations to benefit H.Biden. Outside of purely being a person of influence.

There has never been any evidence that Biden INFLUENCED an outcome to benefit a business for H.Biden or on behalf of H.Biden.

The only thing that can ever be vaguely pointed at, is Burisma. And it's been incontrovertibly demonstrated that Biden acted on anything but the behalf of the USA, and other NATO/UN best intentions.




The lack of evidence always seems to be the 'evidence' of Biden's wrong doing.
Whereas the actual evidence against Trump, Gaetz et al... is always evidence of not being true.

And I don't know how to engage with people who hold that logical framework. The foundations only exist by holding themselves up. There is no base foundation that it builds from.

 

[Lebbo73]

Geez I had Musk to at least survive a few months into the admin, will be removed from the inner circle before inauguration at this rate

Don’t forget Neuralink and the coming Mark of the Beast!

 

[CM86]

What I like about Republicans is they are willing to debate important topics to hash out a good workable solution

Absolutely true! Great example of that is this thread itself!
You guys are always willing to engage and hash out workable solutions!

I mean, people like ET almost only ever post about policy. He never plays the man, he only engages with the points.

Good luck finding a post in this thread from ET where he is just insulting another poster, or making some vague post about 'leftys'.
He just doesn't do it!

 

[zill]

Why did the FBI interfere with the 2020 election?

Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF).

judiciary.house.gov

 

[zill]

Why did the CIA interfere with the 2020 election?

New Information Shows CIA Contractors Colluded with the Biden Campaign to Discredit Hunter Biden Laptop Story

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the House Judiciary Committee, its Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released a joint interim staff report titled, "

judiciary.house.gov

 

[CM86]

Why did the FBI interfere with the 2020 election?

Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On July 17, 2023, the House Judiciary Committee and Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government conducted a transcribed interview of Laura Dehmlow, the Section Chief of the FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force (FITF).

judiciary.house.gov

Why did the CIA interfere with the 2020 election?

New Information Shows CIA Contractors Colluded with the Biden Campaign to Discredit Hunter Biden Laptop Story

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the House Judiciary Committee, its Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence released a joint interim staff report titled, "

judiciary.house.gov

Both of these imply election interference.

It's very A + B = C, therefore D.
And I've looked into this previously and can give you the fact based explanations. But to me, they're not convincing enough to put across to people with your positions. As even I can agree that there are too many coincidences.


But what are your biggest take-aways from both of those articles, that prove election interference in your mind?

 

[Soldier Of Misfortune]

But what are your biggest take-aways from both of those articles, that prove election interference in your mind?

The heavily biased website the articles are from should help C=D.

 

[CM86]

The heavily biased website the articles are from should help C=D.

How dare you impugn the good name of Gym Jordan!

 

[Soldier Of Misfortune]

I love this new obsession with everything being 'weaponised' as if everything wasn't weaponised in the past.

Reeks of "the left invented cancel culture" as if the PMRC and the satanic panic never existed, as if McCarthy never existed or anti-trans laws aren't being designed and promoted right now.

 

[bourbons]

What I like about Republicans is they are willing to debate important topics to hash out a good workable solution, even if it means they occasionally disagree with each; unlike the Democrat lemmings.

The important thing to note is your typical IT employee is a leftie.

Tech employees are much more liberal than their employers — at least as far as the candidates they support

Corporate political action committees aren’t as motivated by partisan politics as individuals tend to be.

www.vox.com

We can replace the leftie tech worker with skilled immigrants.

Of course, Homan will deport all the illegal immigrants that have criminal records, low skilled, will vote democrat anyway etc.

This is a win/win imho.

Sadly out of touch with the base here old son, H1B visas bad so sayeth the rank and file.

Time to update that profile pic yeah?

 

[bourbons]

Really? I thought it would be obvious. What are those books also known as?

So obvious that you provided a clarifying idiom search that didn't even contain your original phrase.

Going well mate

Chaired by a Republican who along with other members of the committee dissented to the decision to release the report because they felt that releasing the report would open the committee to undue criticism and be viewed by some as an attempt “to weaponize the Committee’s process.”

“We believe that operating outside the jurisdictional bounds set forth by House Rules and Committee standards, especially when making public disclosures, is a dangerous departure with potentially catastrophic consequences”.

He is absolutely spot on. Especially when you consider they were releasing a report that relies so heavily on testimony from discredited witnesses.

Just for shits and giggles, what were the "potentially catastrophic consequences"? That an outrageously unqualified nomination might be revealed as such?

 

[bourbons]

The lack of evidence always seems to be the 'evidence' of Biden's wrong doing.
Whereas the actual evidence against Trump, Gaetz et al... is always evidence of not being true.

And I don't know how to engage with people who hold that logical framework. The foundations only exist by holding themselves up. There is no base foundation that it builds from.

This is so spot on

If the set of facts arrayed against Trump were arrayed against Biden, they'd never be able to talk about anything else ever again. But instead its all Biden/Burisma, with nary a thought or acknowledgement of things like Ivanka being a senior WH adviser (lolz) or Kushner tapped to handle the Middle East closely followed by a $2B injection for his hedge fund from the Saudis, whose sovereign wealth fund initially knocked it back before MBS personally intervened to push it through.

I mean really, just imagine if that was the Bidens. They would have spontaneously combusted long ago.

As always

They don't actually have any core beliefs or principles. Just clap like trained seals at whatever Donnie is churning out regardless of the intent or action.

 

[bourbons]

Don’t forget Neuralink and the coming Mark of the Beast!

Congrats on being the first of your ilk I've seen to acknowledge this

The right wing conservative cooker crowd are usually like