NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

CM86 said:
Yes.

Trump was tricked into a bs deal with the Taliban. Which excluded the Afghanistan Government.

The Taliban was breaching the terms of the agreement even before the 5000 Taliban prisoners were forced to be released by Trump threatening sanctions on Afghanistan.


Afghanistan also never actually believed that the US would withdraw its forces, and were totally unprepared for the final withdraw.
The first action by Trump in removing air superiority already set in motion a renewal of the Taliban.
Then he added 5000 important members to it.


Trump agreed to everything, so that he could be the person who ended the 'forever war'.
And it was used initially as the reason people would claim Trump is anti-war.
(The anti-war later morphed into 'no new wars under Trump' rhetoric. Which also wasn't true).



I'm not sure what the best plan of action Biden could have taken by the time he took office.
The only way to protect his men, would be to redeploy more troops into Afghanistan. And I don't think a single person would have supported that.


I don't think Biden did the right thing, or that he handled it well. But I'm not sure what else he could have done by that point.



Laugh emoji if you like, dismiss everything I've said here as well as the information I provided earlier.
You're completely entitled to your own opinion and view on this.
I'm not attacking you or your position. I'm just putting across the available information to you in as clear a way as I can.
Click to expand...
You finally said something that made sense so I won't laugh at this. The deal could have been better but don't lie like Ghost and say the deal made was to give Taliban full control back when it wasn't. Also don't pretend the deal was only leading to that one result. The result was unexpected... Even by NATO who were not thrilled with the deal

US had a few options. Assassination of Taliban's leadership should have happened same day as was written into the military plan agreed to on signing the deal. That would have made a huge difference and been easy to accomplish. Why it wasn't done only Biden and co will know
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
You finally said something that made sense so I won't laugh at this.
Click to expand...
Well maybe in the future when I say things that don't make sense to you, you can't point them out and explain to me why they don't make sense?
So that I can better understand things from both of our perspectives?

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Ghost and say the deal made was to give Taliban full control back when it wasn't.
Click to expand...
I haven't seen him say that.
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Also don't pretend the deal was only leading to that one result. The result was unexpected... Even by NATO who were not thrilled with the deal
Click to expand...
What is the one result I'm pretending about?

The complete collapse of the Afghanistan Government was not expected.
Not many people could have predicted that the Taliban would become the new Afghanistan Government.
But the re-emergence of the Taliban was being reported on long before the fall of Kabul.
And it was being reported on under Trump, who was still progressing with the withdraw.


GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
US had a few options. Assassination of Taliban's leadership should have happened same day as was written into the military plan agreed to on signing the deal. That would have made a huge difference and been easy to accomplish. Why it wasn't done only Biden and co will know
Click to expand...
This isn't an attack on you or judgement.
I think in theory that that's a good idea, and there was probably a plan in place.

But the Taliban are incredibly well funded, and their leadership are notoriously hard to eliminate.

Bin Laden possibly the most known example in the world.

So I have to say that I disagree that it would have been easy to accomplish.


And to add on top of that.
Any directive to redeploy troops into Afghanistan. Or to start creating new military objectives in Afghanistan would have been rejected by almost everyone.







As a final point. Look at the increasing number of attacks on Civilians from the Taliban, AFTER the Doha Accord (Trumps deal).

June 2020
1736033624171.png

July 2020
1736033700365.png

August 2020
1736033747731.png

September 2020
1736033896868.png

October 2020
1736033876116.png

That SAME October 2020, is when Trump tweeted this.

 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
You think 5000 people was a threat to the entire US military that Biden had to run away from ?

It's not the cause of the event. Running away is. If the US can't beat 5000 Taliban soldiers the world is in trouble
Click to expand...

By the time Biden took office, there were less than 3600 US troops in Afghanistan.

Trump's goal was less than 2500 by Jan 2021.



There were more Taliban prisoners released, than there were US troops, when Biden took office.
The best estimate for core members of the Taliban in 2021, was over 70K.
 
CM86 said:
By the time Biden took office, there were less than 3600 US troops in Afghanistan.

Trump's goal was less than 2500 by Jan 2021.



There were more Taliban prisoners released, than there were US troops, when Biden took office.
The best estimate for core members of the Taliban in 2021, was over 70K.
Click to expand...
Afghanistan had an army who fled because they didn’t have any military backup. The entire country wasn’t dependant on 3600 troops, it was dependants on military support. Support that was lost when US refused to attack Taliban as they marched forward.

This situation was the same as the Ukraine one. Put troops on a backline and bomb the shit out of those marching forward. Would have stopped them in days if they tried. US military is beating Russia. You think Taliban is better than Russia?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
What are you saying Trump lied about ? You are not being very clear here at all

You are also avoiding my question. I’ll answer yours once I’m aware what it is .
Click to expand...

Just scroll to the top of the page and read through it again, slowly.
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
I did and you are not being very clear .

Can someone else tell me what Ghost is saying Trump lied about when it comes to Hunter Bidens laptop ? Should take someone 5 seconds yeah since it’s so obvious?
Click to expand...

It was actually a question. Look for the question mark, it's quite obvious.
 
Satan said:
They got cabinet and quasi cabinet posts from Trump
Click to expand...
Well of course. That was the plan .

They are not walking around saying they are the party of the people, wanting to make policies against billionaires and wealth accumulation and then 5 seconds later giving people medals for the sole achievement of being wealthy

One side is being dishonest about its allegiances, the other isn’t. That’s the difference
 
Ghost Patrol said:
It was actually a question. Look for the question mark, it's quite obvious.
Click to expand...
Dude, just make a statement, this is getting tedious so I’ll give up on you being honest and just guess what you mean

I don’t think Trump lied when he said Hunter Bidens laptop existed and had incriminating evidence on it that could influence the 2020 election. Do you think that was a lie.
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Dude, just make a statement, this is getting tedious so I’ll give up on you being honest and just guess what you mean

I don’t think Trump lied when he said Hunter Bidens laptop existed and had incriminating evidence on it that could influence the 2020 election. Do you think that was a lie.
Click to expand...

I clearly stated that they should have given the laptop back.

Then you questioned whether it even existed.

Now you pretend that I'm the one being dishonest?

We can all read the posts mate, they are still there.
 
Ghost Patrol said:
I clearly stated that they should have given the laptop back.

Then you questioned whether it even existed.

Now you pretend that I'm the one being dishonest?

We can all read the posts mate, they are still there.
Click to expand...
I clearly asked for your position as opposed to stating mine. That’s why it had a question mark and was directed to you. Your previous position was it didn’t exist so I’m asking you about that..

YOU stated many times it didn’t exist. Wanting to ignore it wasn’t something I thought you would do
 
GoEaglesGoSGIO said:
Your previous position was it didn’t exist so I’m asking you about that..

YOU stated many times it didn’t exist. Wanting to ignore it wasn’t something I thought you would do
Click to expand...

Where did I state that? Shouldn't be hard for you to find if I said it many times.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Similar threads

HitTheNailOnTheHead
Conspiracy Theory You have more chance of winning US lotto than drowning and yet the Obama and the Clinton chefs have both apparently drowned. What is going on?
Replies
7
Views
320
Ghost Patrol
Ghost Patrol

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top