NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

The 2024 US presidential election is on Tuesday, 5 November 2024. The winner will serve a term of four years in the White House, starting in January 2025.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

What utter nonsense.

Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear

MSM news broadcasts tonight (which I hardly ever watch) all had the same biased take.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Medal of Freedom recipients. Looks like just a list of people they'd like to meet before they get kicked out of the White House.

"Who do you want to meet?"
"I want to meet that gorilla lady."
"Okay. Let's give her a medal."
"I've always wanted to meet Bono. He's so awesome."
"All right. We'll give him a medal."
"Hey, could I get some cooking tips from Jose?"
"Yeah. We'll give him a medal."

There was one award receipient I thought was worthy though. Denzel. Big couple of weeks for him too. Baptised the day before his 70th Birthday and then the Medal of Freedom.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Never noticed the cane the first time.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear

You are mistaken. Stokey isn't 12

 

[Kurve]

What utter nonsense.

You're being ridiculous or not paying attention.

I'm leaning towards ridiculous.

 

[Kurve]

Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear

There was the first clip with Trump which might have been a big ambiguous on the issue of military action against Panama but then he was asked about it again! There's nothing vague about this. Do the reading.

It's you who just wanna hear what you wanna hear.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

First Mention of Greenland in press conference.

President-elect Trump announces 20 billion foreign investment to

- Donald Trump announced that DAMAC Properties, a major Middle East business leader, will be investing at least $20 billion in the United States, potentially doubling that amount, to support new data centers and cloud/AI infrastructure. - Trump said he will work to expedite regulatory reviews...

www.rev.com

Later mention of Greenland in press conference.

President-elect Trump announces 20 billion foreign investment to

- Donald Trump announced that DAMAC Properties, a major Middle East business leader, will be investing at least $20 billion in the United States, potentially doubling that amount, to support new data centers and cloud/AI infrastructure. - Trump said he will work to expedite regulatory reviews...

www.rev.com

Pretty clear to me. A press conference over an hour long during which he called up one of his people to speak about his efforts in the Middle East assisting in negotiations on releasing the hostages and the media tries to put a spin on his comments on Greenland. Colour me shocked.

 

[EasternTiger]

LOL superb.

 

[CM86]

Personally, I’d nuke the whole region and start again.

I'm going to assume that no one in this thread responded to this. Because no one in this thread values you in any form.

I look forward to being proved wrong. I'd like for you to get the validation you so desperately crave.
In the same way when I watch cringe videos on Youtube part of me wishes the cringe loser gets some human connection. It's empathy. And I wish I had less of it.

 

[CM86]

We already knew there wasn't a brain involved.

Why, who told you to think that?

You can't think for yourself.
We all know you're too terrified to ever put a position out there as your own.

Even now, you need to make this 80's joke with a desperate plea for others to support it.
"We already".
It's definitely 'we'! I'm not alone here! If it were just my opinion I'd never have come forward with it, because I'm a coward'.


Was it you that had the whole neighbour dispute about a light? Or was that a satirical 27B/6 story that I've conflated you with?

 

[CM86]

So you support a known liar?

He's repeatedly and clearly explained his position, why he holds it, and why he disputes your position.


If you want to engage, you know how.

If you want to attack for reasons apparently beyond the both of you, then take it to SRP.

 

[CM86]

Geez they're all really bending the knee aren't they.

The damage Trump has done and will do that country is incalculable

Everything they argued against...

Like, literally everything they implied was happening, and because it wasn't provable that it wasn't happening... It meant we need a revolution...

They're now 100% behind... because 'at least it's obvious'.


NO...
You oppose something because of what it is...
Not because you think it exists but can't demonstrate it.


No one watched Chis Hansen's To Catch a Predator and said 'If they'd just been blatantly open and honest, I'd have supported them!'.

It's the action not the deception.

But suddenly it's all about truth (while ignoring Trumps lack of truth).



They don't say "Why don't you take a seat, and explain your hypocrisy?".
They say, take a seat and explain your ****ing actions.

I beg for a single Trump supporter in this thread to argue with me that the implication of something is worse than the application of the same thing.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

There was the first clip with Trump which might have been a big ambiguous on the issue of military action against Panama but then he was asked about it again! There's nothing vague about this. Do the reading.

It's you who just wanna hear what you wanna hear.

Which one? Do you have a media link . Every single media report is about that first quote also remember

 

[Kurve]

Which one? Do you have a media link . Every single media report is about that first quote also remember

I already posted it.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

I can see the press conference for the California bush fires now

Reporter - “Mr Trump, can you rule out using either gasoline or water to put the fires?
Trump - “No”
Headline - “Trump suggests using gasoline to put out California bush fires”

Reporter - “Mr Trump, can you rule out using either gasoline or water to put the fires?
Trump - “Yes”
Headline - “Trump refuses to use water to put out California bush fires”

Reporter - “Mr Trump, can you rule out using either gasoline or water to put the fires?
Trump - “We will use water but not gasoline”
Headline - “Trump refuses to provide gasoline to fire trucks to drive to California bush fire”

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

I already posted it.

Which post?

In any sense too 5 Google articles suggests he will use military force on Greenland AND Panama canals

Do you have the quote about Greenland

 

[Ghost Patrol]

It’s not Trump’s fault that he can’t form coherent sentences for media to quote.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

It’s not Trump’s fault that he can’t form coherent sentences for media to quote.

And Biden could ?

Both get wildly misquoted. Trump more then Biden but it’s much the same strategy.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

And Biden could ?

Both get wildly misquoted. Trump more then Biden but it’s much the same strategy.

Yeah but that’s Bidens fault. He has a stutter and is very old.

Trump has no excuse. As such he is completely innocent.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

GoEaglesGoSGIO I know you asked Kurve for this but I posted a link to the second discussion of Greenland from his press conference in #4,858. It contains the transcript and video clip side by side.

Anyway here's the transcript.

Speaker 7 (50:26):
Back on Greenland. Your position is clear, but have you directed your staff to take any specific actions to draw plans and can you elaborate again, you didn't rule out military coercion in-
Donald Trump (50:37):
Well, we need Greenland for national security purposes. I've been told that for a long time, long before I even ran. I mean, people have been talking about it for a long time. You have approximately 45,000 people there. People really don't even know if Denmark has any legal right to it, but if they do, they should give it up because we need it for national security. That's for the free world. I'm talking about protecting the free world. You don't even need binoculars. You look outside, you have China ships all over the place. You have Russian ships all over the place. We're not letting that happen. We're not letting it happen. And if Denmark wants to get to a conclusion, but nobody knows if they even have any right, title, or interest. The people are going to probably vote for independence or to come into the United States. But if they did do that, then I would tariff Denmark at a very high level.
Speaker 5 (51:34):
Have you asked your staff to draw plans for acquisition? Are you active-
Donald Trump (51:35):
No, we're not at that stage. I haven't even entered office yet.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

GoEaglesGoSGIO I know you asked Kurve for this but I posted a link to the second discussion of Greenland from his press conference in #4,858. It contains the transcript and video clip side by side.

Anyway here's the transcript.

Speaker 7 (50:26):
Back on Greenland. Your position is clear, but have you directed your staff to take any specific actions to draw plans and can you elaborate again, you didn't rule out military coercion in-
Donald Trump (50:37):
Well, we need Greenland for national security purposes. I've been told that for a long time, long before I even ran. I mean, people have been talking about it for a long time. You have approximately 45,000 people there. People really don't even know if Denmark has any legal right to it, but if they do, they should give it up because we need it for national security. That's for the free world. I'm talking about protecting the free world. You don't even need binoculars. You look outside, you have China ships all over the place. You have Russian ships all over the place. We're not letting that happen. We're not letting it happen. And if Denmark wants to get to a conclusion, but nobody knows if they even have any right, title, or interest. The people are going to probably vote for independence or to come into the United States. But if they did do that, then I would tariff Denmark at a very high level.
Speaker 5 (51:34):
Have you asked your staff to draw plans for acquisition? Are you active-
Donald Trump (51:35):
No, we're not at that stage. I haven't even entered office yet.

Just admit you lied next time Kurve. Much easier then this

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

The kangaroos will stop them. Why do you think we have 500 million of them>?

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Yeah but that’s Bidens fault. He has a stutter and is very old.

Trump has no excuse. As such he is completely innocent.

Very old is a weird description of dementia. Im sure thats whats on the box for Donepezil.

"Treat the symptoms of very old with Donepezil"