NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics Pt 2

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary will be deleted and warnings issued, that includes mockery and trying to pass it off as a joke.

Play nice, please.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Medal of Freedom recipients. Looks like just a list of people they'd like to meet before they get kicked out of the White House.

"Who do you want to meet?"
"I want to meet that gorilla lady."
"Okay. Let's give her a medal."
"I've always wanted to meet Bono. He's so awesome."
"All right. We'll give him a medal."
"Hey, could I get some cooking tips from Jose?"
"Yeah. We'll give him a medal."

There was one award receipient I thought was worthy though. Denzel. Big couple of weeks for him too. Baptised the day before his 70th Birthday and then the Medal of Freedom.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Never noticed the cane the first time.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear

You are mistaken. Stokey isn't 12

 

[Kurve]

What utter nonsense.

You're being ridiculous or not paying attention.

I'm leaning towards ridiculous.

 

[Kurve]

Reporter: Can you assure the world that as you try to get control of Greenland and the Panama Canal, that you won't use military or economic coercion?

They just dont understand the word OR

I mean im pretty sure a 12 year old could listen to that press conference and understand he means he will use economic coercsion, but the lefties just wanna hear what they wanna hear

There was the first clip with Trump which might have been a big ambiguous on the issue of military action against Panama but then he was asked about it again! There's nothing vague about this. Do the reading.

It's you who just wanna hear what you wanna hear.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

First Mention of Greenland in press conference.

President-elect Trump announces 20 billion foreign investment to

- Donald Trump announced that DAMAC Properties, a major Middle East business leader, will be investing at least $20 billion in the United States, potentially doubling that amount, to support new data centers and cloud/AI infrastructure. - Trump said he will work to expedite regulatory reviews...

www.rev.com

Later mention of Greenland in press conference.

President-elect Trump announces 20 billion foreign investment to

- Donald Trump announced that DAMAC Properties, a major Middle East business leader, will be investing at least $20 billion in the United States, potentially doubling that amount, to support new data centers and cloud/AI infrastructure. - Trump said he will work to expedite regulatory reviews...

www.rev.com

Pretty clear to me. A press conference over an hour long during which he called up one of his people to speak about his efforts in the Middle East assisting in negotiations on releasing the hostages and the media tries to put a spin on his comments on Greenland. Colour me shocked.

 

[EasternTiger]

LOL superb.

 

[CM86]

Personally, I’d nuke the whole region and start again.

I'm going to assume that no one in this thread responded to this. Because no one in this thread values you in any form.

I look forward to being proved wrong. I'd like for you to get the validation you so desperately crave.
In the same way when I watch cringe videos on Youtube part of me wishes the cringe loser gets some human connection. It's empathy. And I wish I had less of it.

 

[CM86]

Geez they're all really bending the knee aren't they.

The damage Trump has done and will do that country is incalculable

Everything they argued against...

Like, literally everything they implied was happening, and because it wasn't provable that it wasn't happening... It meant we need a revolution...

They're now 100% behind... because 'at least it's obvious'.


NO...
You oppose something because of what it is...
Not because you think it exists but can't demonstrate it.


No one watched Chis Hansen's To Catch a Predator and said 'If they'd just been blatantly open and honest, I'd have supported them!'.

It's the action not the deception.

But suddenly it's all about truth (while ignoring Trumps lack of truth).



They don't say "Why don't you take a seat, and explain your hypocrisy?".
They say, take a seat and explain your ****ing actions.

I beg for a single Trump supporter in this thread to argue with me that the implication of something is worse than the application of the same thing.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

There was the first clip with Trump which might have been a big ambiguous on the issue of military action against Panama but then he was asked about it again! There's nothing vague about this. Do the reading.

It's you who just wanna hear what you wanna hear.

Which one? Do you have a media link . Every single media report is about that first quote also remember

 

[Kurve]

Which one? Do you have a media link . Every single media report is about that first quote also remember

I already posted it.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

I already posted it.

Which post?

In any sense too 5 Google articles suggests he will use military force on Greenland AND Panama canals

Do you have the quote about Greenland

 

[Ghost Patrol]

It’s not Trump’s fault that he can’t form coherent sentences for media to quote.

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

It’s not Trump’s fault that he can’t form coherent sentences for media to quote.

And Biden could ?

Both get wildly misquoted. Trump more then Biden but it’s much the same strategy.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

And Biden could ?

Both get wildly misquoted. Trump more then Biden but it’s much the same strategy.

Yeah but that’s Bidens fault. He has a stutter and is very old.

Trump has no excuse. As such he is completely innocent.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

GoEaglesGoSGIO I know you asked Kurve for this but I posted a link to the second discussion of Greenland from his press conference in #4,858. It contains the transcript and video clip side by side.

Anyway here's the transcript.

Speaker 7 (50:26):
Back on Greenland. Your position is clear, but have you directed your staff to take any specific actions to draw plans and can you elaborate again, you didn't rule out military coercion in-
Donald Trump (50:37):
Well, we need Greenland for national security purposes. I've been told that for a long time, long before I even ran. I mean, people have been talking about it for a long time. You have approximately 45,000 people there. People really don't even know if Denmark has any legal right to it, but if they do, they should give it up because we need it for national security. That's for the free world. I'm talking about protecting the free world. You don't even need binoculars. You look outside, you have China ships all over the place. You have Russian ships all over the place. We're not letting that happen. We're not letting it happen. And if Denmark wants to get to a conclusion, but nobody knows if they even have any right, title, or interest. The people are going to probably vote for independence or to come into the United States. But if they did do that, then I would tariff Denmark at a very high level.
Speaker 5 (51:34):
Have you asked your staff to draw plans for acquisition? Are you active-
Donald Trump (51:35):
No, we're not at that stage. I haven't even entered office yet.

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

The kangaroos will stop them. Why do you think we have 500 million of them>?

 

[GoEaglesGoSGIO]

Yeah but that’s Bidens fault. He has a stutter and is very old.

Trump has no excuse. As such he is completely innocent.

Very old is a weird description of dementia. Im sure thats whats on the box for Donepezil.

"Treat the symptoms of very old with Donepezil"

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

Just admit you lied next time. Much easier then this

I lied?

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

 

[CM86]

I already posted it.

Kurve is one of the most honest, engaging, supportive and inclusive people most of us will ever know.
The time and effort they've put into creating and growing a community of people that can be at each others throats while within site rules, is incredible.
Kurve will never be appreciated for their invisible moderation that makes everyone feel heard and satisfied. Without being embarrassed.
Other admin/mods do it now, but Kurve stands out.

Yet still posters need to attack them through the lens of 'mod'.
They can't attack them for what's posted, what's explained, what's sourced, what's linked.
They can only attack by attributing positions to her that she does not, and has never had.

There are a number of admin/mods etc on this site who I will always respect and admire, who are hated by others. And I can understand their positions.
But the silly attacks on Kurve over the last few pages, are purely because she is viewed through the lens of being a 'BF Mod'.
Engage with her posts and her positions.

 

[Kurve]

Kurve is one of the most honest, engaging, supportive and inclusive people most of us will ever know.
The time and effort they've put into creating and growing a community of people that can be at each others throats while within site rules, is incredible.
Kurve will never be appreciated for their invisible moderation that makes everyone feel heard and satisfied. Without being embarrassed.
Other admin/mods do it now, but Kurve stands out.

Yet still posters need to attack them through the lens of 'mod'.
They can't attack them for what's posted, what's explained, what's sourced, what's linked.
They can only attack by attributing positions to her that she does not, and has never had.

There are a number of admin/mods etc on this site who I will always respect and admire, who are hated by others. And I can understand their positions.
But the silly attacks on Kurve over the last few pages, are purely because she is viewed through the lens of being a 'BF Mod'.
Engage with her posts and her positions.

Thankyou

 

[CM86]

We need to break this devoutness to 'the narrative'.

The narrative should come from discussions.
Discussions shouldn't come from the narrative.


The most recent example of narrative controlling discussion, is pretending it's an issue of semantics in how the President-elects is discussing gaining control over the Panama Canal.


Two things about this bullshit rhetoric.
Firstly.
It's NOT about the semantics of if he did or didn't clearly rule it out. If it's more that he was 'just responding to the economics sactions' blah blah.

The issue is that it's being asked, based on his statements. It's being asked because THE PRESIDENT ELECT HAS IMPLIED MILITARY ACTION.

Stop blaming 'the left', or 'the media' for the US President Elect not being clear on if he intends on taking military action on something.

The problem is, the idea of the President-elect even posing the idea, of using military force as a threat against Panama... That's the ****ing issue...
That without him stating he won't, we aren't sure...


Secondly.
It's the ****ING PANAMA CANAL!!!
What economic restrictions do you think the US can apply to the Panama, that won't pale in significance to the economic impact on the US, if no US trade is allowed through the Panama Canal?
The obvious result being that the only coercion, in reality, would be military.

 

[CM86]

And now as an overall issue, that includes this current narrative.
STOP ****ING LYING ABOUT YOUR POSITIONS!

He didn't mean what he said.​

He didn't say what he means.​

It's always the same. You argue that Trump WILL NOT do A. Because of the optics.
You support A, you agree with A, you wish A was already happening.
Stop arguing that something you want or support won't happen. Argue why you think it should!

You get sucked into the narrative and scream black and blue that A will never happen.
It's almost always the same playbook.

Trump will never do A.​

Any suggestion that Trump will do A is just 'fake news', 'MSM', Globalism' whatever.​

Then Trump does A.​

Instantly you're now pointing out that 'of course Trump did A'.​

Trump needed to do A.​

You love that Trump did A, because of how badly it triggered all the inner-city-latte-lefy-soy-cuck-woke-dei-sjw-blm democrats!​

Best and most obvious example I can think of at the moment, is that Trump was not going to accept the 2020 election results if he lost. That Trump would deny the election results if he lost.

Leading up to the 2020 election it was all about the 'fake news MSN Woke Mafia' etc was just trying to attack Trump. That it wasn't true. That of course Trump would accept the election results (if fair). Trump would never attempt to stop the certification of the election results, that's something only the globalist establishment Hillary would do.
The Dems and Hillary are the only people evil enough to do that. Stop accusing Trump for for the Dems do!!!
Of course Trump would ensure the peaceful transfer of power and accept the results. It's his integrity and love for the US and the Constitution, which is why we support him!
Trump would never deny the election results.

Then Trump lost the 2020 election and denied the results. Trump does A.​

Instantly it's all about 'of course he denied the election results', 'of course he never accepted the 2020 election results', 'of course he tried to prevent the certification of the election. He had to. He needed to.
Of course he did it, it's what all politicians do. The Dems have done it for decades, of course Trump was going to do it. In fact, I'd be angry with him if he didn't!
Also, it's so awesome in how badly it triggers all the inner-city-latte-lefy-soy-cuck-woke-dei-sjw-blm democrats!