Slogans are for websites and letterheads.
Yes and we all remember how effective the NRL "simply the best" campaign was, so much so that the SANFL copied it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Slogans are for websites and letterheads.
Someone once said "Slogans are for websites and letterheads."
The constant need for the USAFL to state "it's not rugby" simply underlines the need for a concise apt description
that doesn't refer to other sports (at least at the first level).
His final words were that it was like watching soccer, rugby, and league, but it was better.structured
You didn't need to alter my post.
I didn't alter your post.
just underlining the fact that the description came from someone watching the game for the first time.
"Which is understandable for a newbie describing the game in terms of their environment having watched a game".
My concern is for people associated with the game of Australian Football trying to attract novices to the game.
How did you describe the game to your brother before the game ?
It's an in-joke, mixed with a meme that was circulating twitter.Someone once said "Slogans are for websites and letterheads."
The constant need for the USAFL to state "it's not rugby" simply underlines the need for a concise apt description
that doesn't refer to other sports (at least at the first level).
It's an in-joke, mixed with a meme that was circulating twitter.
The first words that we get from most people when we say that we follow or play or are connected to Australian Rules Football is, "that's rugby, isn't it?" It's not just me, but from numerous other people involved in the league.
USAFL Nationals have been running for 25 years and Aussie Rules clubs now exist all over America
The USAFL Nationals are a huge event. The numbers are impressive.
Canadian teams have an increasing presence.
Shouldn't the USAFL Nationals reflect this with "international" in there somewhere.
Would that lift it's profile ?
Would the AFL be more inclined to get involved especially with the I.C. canned ?
So you apparently don't think it's a good idea to increase the scope of the USAFL Nationals.I wouldn't say Canadians are having an "increasing presence".
The AFL's main focus for involvement in North America will be the Trans-Atlantic Cup.
So you apparently don't think it's a good idea to increase the scope of the USAFL Nationals.
I believe it might improve the sale ability of the event by making it international.
Likewise I believe by having a few playoffs only you could create a Canadian National League
and an American National League which must be a more attractive sell to sponsors.
The increase could underwrite the added cost but obviosly you'd need the seed money.
I just think an expanded Nationals will never be able to escape its US-centric roots.
It will be USAFL-plus. Similar how to the AFL still struggles with being VFL-plus.
If the AFL commits to funding a Canadian tournament as well as the Nationals, I'd have no qualms with that.
I think this would be pretty cool.
AFL Europe has been hosting a champions' league for a few years now. Not sure how it would work, but a North American champions' league would be pretty cool, and something you could easily sell to sponsors and stream.