"Value" of Pick 16

Remove this Banner Ad

why the accusation...

I am thinking it maight be a statement by Port, if true, that this years draft is weak...

Port are one of the best at identifying young talent. Do they see something the stats dont show.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

why the accusation...

I am thinking it maight be a statement by Port, if true, that this years draft is weak...

Port are one of the best at identifying young talent. Do they see something the stats dont show.

Pick 16 was mentioned on 3AW's sport show last night. I caught the tail end of a conversation by Healey. As I put on the Port board I don't know if anything else was included or part of a 3 way deal, BUT it doesn't mean it's a done deal because 3AW mention it. Shock, horror they have been wrong before. As a straight out deal 16 is too much, I could live with 33.
 
The guy has talent, he is just lazy. Every single preseason so far he ends up in the rehab group every second week with some soft injury and just gives the impression that he doesnt care. This could be changed at Port as he will know its his last chance and he might become a decent player. Pick 16 looks over the odds, but i cant see Richmond accepting 33 as we may not even use it and he is under contract. Probably worth around 25 or so.

got to agree but remember Port are in need of a marking forward and for all his faults, his is a very accurate kick for goal. Tredrea's days appear numbered, and does anyone care to name another marking forward that is available.

Apparently Tim Boyle is not.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

"Value" of Pick 16

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top