Current WAR CRIMES Israel - Hamas - Hezbollah - Houthis

Remove this Banner Ad

Fighting terrorism is not genocide.

However, I think people like you, who deliberately distribute misinformation play a significant part in radicalising feeble minded people without a strong sense of morality.

I'm glad that you can also identify that jason_recliner has been radicalised.
Yes, I have reported deplorable Israeli propaganda. If it gets deleted I can't do anything about that.
 
It's a war zone Jazny. How do we know they weren't mercenaries?

just because they were Arab Israelis does not mean they were mercenaries. Shocking take even for you.

If you were born in a refugee camp and lived under an apartheid regime for many years, do you think that would that radicalise you?

 

Log in to remove this ad.

Fighting terrorism is not genocide.

However, I think people like you, who deliberately distribute misinformation play a significant part in radicalising feeble minded people without a strong sense of morality.

I'm glad that you can also identify that jason_recliner has been radicalised.

Sorry to break it to you, but people far more qualified than you or I to make comment consider it a likely genocide being committed by Israel against the Palestinian people right now.
 
Sorry to break it to you, but people far more qualified than you or I to make comment consider it a likely genocide being committed by Israel against the Palestinian people right now.

Someone obviously struggles to understand the difference between plausible & likely.

Can't blame you though as it is pretty obvious you get your information mostly from pro Hamas sources.
 
Someone obviously struggles to understand the difference between plausible & likely.

Can't blame you though as it is pretty obvious you get your information mostly from pro Hamas sources.
If you're talking about the ICJ case, the "plausible" was widely misreported as though the ICJ were saying it was "plausible that Israel was committing genocide". When what the court was referring to is that Palestinians have a plausible right to be protected under the genocide convention and South Africa can argue their case in the court. That was it. It was not a ruling on the strength of South Africa's case being plausible. Unfortunately a lot of reporters aren't great legal communicators, and it is a technical point that takes a bit of understanding, so it got misreported I think more by mistake than by deliberate misinformation.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If you're talking about the ICJ case, the "plausible" was widely misreported as though the ICJ were saying it was "plausible that Israel was committing genocide". When what the court was referring to is that Palestinians have a plausible right to be protected under the genocide convention and South Africa can argue their case in the court. That was it. It was not a ruling on the strength of South Africa's case being plausible. Unfortunately a lot of reporters aren't great legal communicators, and it is a technical point that takes a bit of understanding, so it got misreported I think more by mistake than by deliberate misinformation.

How much time have you spent looking for technicalities in the ICJ wording?
 
How much time have you spent looking for technicalities in the ICJ wording?
It's called being informed. This was explained by Judge Donahue on a television interview on the BBC TV if you actually cared to consume any media that wasn't some random nonsense posted on twitter. You can read more about it in law journals that discuss it.
 
It's called being informed. This was explained by Judge Donahue on a television interview on the BBC TV if you actually cared to consume any media that wasn't some random nonsense posted on twitter. You can read more about it in law journals that discuss it.

You do realise that BBC has multiple twitter accounts, yeah?
 
You do realise that BBC News interviews are not random nonsense, yeah?

It's not random. Far from it.

 
I'll go out on a limb and guess that they were "working". Something members of Hezbollah should be doing to improve their own country rather than cosplaying as freedom fighters while committing terrorism.
People in the occupied west bank tried the whole "working" thing. It's death by a thousand cuts for them. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/video/israeli-settlement-expansion-in-the-occupied-west-bank/yt7rnl0xt

I wonder how long before Claudia is off the ME assignment.
 
Hezbollah killing 5 civilians including an Israeli national is something to joke and be sarcastic about, according to you. I am sure this will draw widespread condemnation from 'your side' as they distance themselves from such comments.
This is fair, I do feel bad for the workers who were there it's good you are caring about civilians for a change, maybe there is hope for you after all.
Might be a bit hard considering it was a Druze village and farmland prior to and around the time of The First Aaliyah, it was purchased and settled by Jews from 1896.
Since when has land ownership been taken into consideration over there? Don't you just need to shoot and remove the previous tenant to claim the land as your own? Or is that only The West Bank (you know that place? it has those other civilians you stick your head in the sand at any mention of their plight)
 
People in the occupied west bank tried the whole "working" thing. It's death by a thousand cuts for them. https://www.sbs.com.au/news/video/israeli-settlement-expansion-in-the-occupied-west-bank/yt7rnl0xt

I wonder how long before Claudia is off the ME assignment.
I worry what will happen in the West Bank if Trump gets in. Too many right wingers in charge all at once wont be a good thing.

As for Hezbollah, they have no good reason to be attacking Israel. They brought the whole war on themselves through sheer stupidity.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current WAR CRIMES Israel - Hamas - Hezbollah - Houthis

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top