Warnock v C Wood

Warnock v Wood

  • Warnock

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Wood

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
They'll both be excellent ruckman by 2010-11. Both still have a shite load of development in them.
 
If these polls are going to be unbiased then supporters of the clubs for which the players are from should not vote but comment in the thread. You can see there are a majority of fans voting for their own players but in this case outside supporters think warnock. :D
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yeah but if you take out all carlton/collingwood supporters you'll find it's something like 60-20 warnock
That probably because

1:Wood plays for Collingwood

and

2:Everyone has been talking about Robbie
 
i think it's pretty clear that wood is a better prospect. especially given he understands how footy is played and doesn't just get on with height. that's why we got him for pick 14 and the bluesers got him for 24.
 
i'd probably go with wood as well. i don't know if carlton did the right thing by giving warnock 4 years for 1.6mil or whatever it was as well as giving up pick 24. wood certainly hasn't done anythign to suggest he'll make a good afl ruckman but he's certainly done more than warnock.
 
i think it's pretty clear that wood is a better prospect. especially given he understands how footy is played and doesn't just get on with height. that's why we got him for pick 14 and the bluesers got him for 24.

Pick 14 to run around in the VFL, yeah well worth it compared to 24. And as usual Collinghwood pay over the odds for a ordinary player, who was the last good player you got through a trade? Buckley, No body wants to deal with the filth thats why you pay pick 14 for a VFL ruckman.
 
Pick 14 was an option we had to take and we could take it in a weak draft. He may of been playing in VFL but Ruckman are like hens teeth especially young ones. Both ruckman are fine prospects but I think as mentioned before Carlton made a huge mistake offering Warnock 4 years you won't be able to keep all your first rounders for ever.
 
Both of them imo are shit they havent shown anything at all it is all Hype. im going to go Warnock though coz Wood sits out while Bryan plays :D
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Both of them imo are shit they havent shown anything at all it is all Hype. im going to go Warnock though coz Wood sits out while Bryan plays :D

Stupid Logic, Well Warnock must be a Huge Dud because I heard talk he almost got Dropped to the WAFL Reserves and Could not get a Game ahead of Gilmore and Bradly:eek:

Wood at least has a Rising Star Nomination to go beside his Name, Tall Ruckman like Wood and Warnock will be up and down for Awhile at the Start of the Carrier because they have to fill out so much
 
\ And as usual Collinghwood pay over the odds for a ordinary player, who was the last good player you got through a trade? Buckley, No body wants to deal with the filth thats why you pay pick 14 for a VFL ruckman.
Gee, what about an AA forward pocket? Does that count as a good player? Usually AA players are kinda handy....

Hampson was running around in the VFL all last year basically. Is he a waste of pick 19 or whatever he was eh?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top