Don’t hold your breath, he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.Enlighten me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t hold your breath, he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.Enlighten me
I don’t expect you to agree, you support Carlton and need Weitering to win.Can't agree.
Interesting that two people have answered but haven't clarified anything.Don’t hold your breath, he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.
I hope you guys take it all this year, good luck.Don’t hold your breath, he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Haven't clarified anything?Interesting that two people have answered but haven't clarified anything.
The question isn't hard.
He was fined for a poor choice of words?
So guilty of an eye gouge?Haven't clarified anything?
I thought you were being deliberately obtuse when you replied...
Were you serious? If so, it was basically just a poor choice of words by Sam Edmund in the tweet that was quoted.
Weitering DID have a case to answer. He was found guilty.
Edmund just poorly distinguished a fine vs a suspension as 'no case to answer'.
Not much to it really. Thought it was pretty obvious.
If there is no case to answer why did he get fined.? That doesn't make sense.
Jacob wietering will gouge again. He must be brought to justice.
Sorry, are still being obtuse?So guilty of an eye gouge?
Won't somebody think of the children?Jacob wietering will gouge again. He must be brought to justice.
You're lucky you can still see in order to post this. Jacob obviously doesn't know where you live yet.
Wording heySorry, are still being obtuse?
There is no charge of eye gouging.
It's unnecessary or unreasonable contact to the eye region.
Graded careless, low impact and high contact. Which is a fine under the current guidelines.
So he was found guilty of careless, unnecessary, low impact contact with the eye region. Not a gouge, no.
Sorry, are still being obtuse?
There is no charge of eye gouging.
It's unnecessary or unreasonable contact to the eye region.
Graded careless, low impact and high contact. Which is a fine under the current guidelines.
So he was found guilty of careless, unnecessary, low impact contact with the eye region. Not a gouge, no.
I don’t stay in the same place for more than 24hrs
Weitering is part cyborg though. I'd go underground if I was you.
Nice try. If he was part cyborg he wouldn’t have fallen for the old person internet scam.