Traded West Coast trade #52 & #64 to Brisbane for #46 & #91

[Taylor]

West Coast trade #52 & #64 to Brisbane for #46 & #91

 

[kreglze]

These are those random pick swaps that have very little consequence I enjoy.

 

[Freomaniac]

These are those random pick swaps that have very little consequence I enjoy.

blockbuster trade for both teams

 

[Sheepey]

This is the real hard-hitting stuff.

 

[Northernsoul74]

West Coast winning trade week. 2 trades done no messing

 

[Forward Press]

Forget the Tim Kelly trade, this is the real big story from West Coast in trade week.

 

[evo]

It would be interesting to see how many times #46 actually landed a better player than #52; I bet there's nothing in it.

 

[Milanista28]

Lol Brisbane, just give up on footy ffs.

 

[Northernsoul74]

Lol Brisbane, just give up on footy ffs.

Or continue to finish second on the ladder and play finals.

 

[WilloTree]

Huge news. Haggers is all over this one.

 

[La Dispute]

Lol Brisbane, just give up on footy ffs.

Looks better for Brisbane IMO

 

[kreglze]

I want an hour of Trade Radio dedicated to this trade and the 'machinations' of it.

 

[Milanista28]

Looks better for Brisbane IMO

Haven't really thought about it tbh

 

[La Dispute]

Tom Morris hiding in the bushes outside Pick 91’s house as we speak

 

[markr]

Is this just shifting points around because Brisbane are going to be using those picks to cover academy bids anyway? (I have NFI if the Lions have any academy kids this year)

 

[iBeng]

Very shrewd from us, fantastic move.

 

[Elmer_Hauser]

 

[CakeEater]

Huge news. Haggers is all over this one.

He was in tears reporting it , Ive heard.

 

[La Dispute]

Have no idea what the logic is here for West Coast. A six pick upgrade in an average draft while flicking a similar pick in the range seems a bit pointless?

 

[Max zero]

Have no idea what the logic is here for West Coast. A six pick upgrade in an average draft while flicking a similar pick in the range seems a bit pointless?

If you are only planning on using 1 draft pick and upgrading 2 rookies it makes perfect sense.

 

[Forward Press]

It would be interesting to see how many times #46 actually landed a better player than #52; I bet there's nothing in it.

Last 10 years (pick 46 mentioned first, games in brackets)

Stratton (188), Bollenhagen (4)
Farmer (0), O'Shea (92)
Joyce (0), Tynan (2)
Membrey (92), Jones (61)
Knight (54), Byrne-Jones (86)
Daniel (91), Drummond (5)
Hulett (0), Willis (5)
Hannan (41), Rioli (38)
Paton (16), Crossley (10)
Taylor (2), Koschitzke (0)

 

[ziad]

Tom Morris hiding in the bushes outside Pick 91’s house as we speak

91 - Rookie upgrade (watson) so how low does't matter but the 46 is better than 52 - watch this space as Vosso the fox is on the job

 

[Suma Magic]

What’s the difference between 64 and 91? Not much.

A bit of a nothing trade.

 

[Purple Suit]

Last 10 years (pick 46 mentioned first, games in brackets)

Stratton (188), Bollenhagen (4)
Farmer (0), O'Shea (92)
Joyce (0), Tynan (2)
Membrey (92), Jones (61)
Knight (54), Byrne-Jones (86)
Daniel (91), Drummond (5)
Hulett (0), Willis (5)
Hannan (41), Rioli (38)
Paton (16), Crossley (10)
Taylor (2), Koschitzke (0)

Take out Stratton and it's basically even.

 

[Eastern Rangers]

If you are only planning on using 1 draft pick and upgrading 2 rookies it makes perfect sense.

Then package this pick with next years additional third rounder (points).




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk