- Jun 28, 2013
- 32,717
- 50,333
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
What happens?
Not saying it will happen - just interested....
Not saying it will happen - just interested....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Fair enough. Was just interested in whether there were any consequences under the ASADA Act if a sporting organization who had signed up to the code chose to ignore a CAS ruling.Can we just get the actual appeal done before we start considered what ifs?
Yes, there would be.Fair enough. Was just interested in whether there were any consequences under the ASADA Act if a sporting organization who had signed up to the code chose to ignore a CAS ruling.
Not happening. It will look too much like not accepting the umpires decision. Even with 12 months notice and the skills of the AFL PR machine they are not going to pull that one off. IMHO I think we are all going to get a fair hearing at CAS anyway. The AFL privately must be pretty pissed off with the time the process is taking (and ASADA are to blame for most of that) and they may use that as a trigger for future reform.What happens?
Not saying it will happen - just interested....
What exactly is that GCL?
The political fall out alone makes it unlikely. But interested in the actual legal consequenceNot happening. It will look too much like not accepting the umpires decision. Even with 12 months notice and the skills of the AFL PR machine they are not going to pull that one off. IMHO I think we are all going to get a fair hearing at CAS anyway. The AFL privately must be pretty pissed off with the time the process is taking (and ASADA are to blame for most of that) and they may use that as a trigger for future reform.
Reckon that's a bit harsh Telsa. ASADA are not to blame for the length of time this has taken. If your blokes had records of what was injected into your players, they wouldn't have had to undertake an extensive investigation. If your blokes AND HIRD didn't take it to court and then appeal we would be further down the track.Not happening. It will look too much like not accepting the umpires decision. Even with 12 months notice and the skills of the AFL PR machine they are not going to pull that one off. IMHO I think we are all going to get a fair hearing at CAS anyway. The AFL privately must be pretty pissed off with the time the process is taking (and ASADA are to blame for most of that) and they may use that as a trigger for future reform.
What good (or dodgy) lawyer doesn't plan ahead like this?Can we just get the actual appeal done before we start considered what ifs?
I'm neither good nor dodgy DR. Too bloody niceWhat good (or dodgy) lawyer doesn't plan ahead like this?
Essendons? They were all shocked to be sitting here, apparently.What good (or dodgy) lawyer doesn't plan ahead like this?
Have heard all the arguments here and it's pretty clear.Reckon that's a bit harsh Telsa. ASADA are not to blame for the length of time this has taken. If your blokes had records of what was injected into your players, they wouldn't have had to undertake an extensive investigation. If your blokes AND HIRD didn't take it to court and then appeal we would be further down the track.
Re delay - I think Essendon and the AFL erred by having the press conference. It takes time for any investigation to be completed. The issue was that it was out in the open (well obviously not all of it!)Not happening. It will look too much like not accepting the umpires decision. Even with 12 months notice and the skills of the AFL PR machine they are not going to pull that one off. IMHO I think we are all going to get a fair hearing at CAS anyway. The AFL privately must be pretty pissed off with the time the process is taking (and ASADA are to blame for most of that) and they may use that as a trigger for future reform.
Well this is what I am a little worried about it hence my technical question (the PR side of it all is another discussion entirely BUT clearly important context).The groundwork has been laid to draw a sympathetic ear to the players already, the next step is to set WADA against all AFL players so that the final decision is easier to make out as unfair. Gillion in a press conference saying: "Enough is enough", talking about Saad and the evil WADA.
Then the AFL can be the heroes and decide to bravely step away from ASADA, bring it's own performance enhancing drug monitors into play and publicly be seen to be doing good for all it's players but in reality it is just protecting it's brand by keeping it's most marketable players off suspensions. Never again will the integrity of the AFL balance sheet be compromised by bans.
Loss all government financial support at all levels. But the PR damage would be massive and would enable other sports to openly state that the AFL is covering up systemic drug use by all clubs and is a game full of cheats and liars. This would mean that they go on the nose in growth states and all the hard work done in recent years is out the window and would force one of the Queensland clubs to the wall.The political fall out alone makes it unlikely. But interested in the actual legal consequence
What exactly is that GCL?
The NFL did it in the US, just earlier this year a guy was banned for 4 games for using steroids, WADA would have kicked him for 2-4 years.Well this is what I am a little worried about it hence my technical question (the PR side of it all is another discussion entirely BUT clearly important context).
LolArmageddon. The HTB will go into meltdown. This will trigger a chain reaction, the hellfire of which will consume the AFL. Then all sports, and eventually the world.
Ok - whilst there aren't many serious answers here I am enjoying myself. He he
- West Australia will lose any funding for their new stadium. They will ultimately secede.
- Any other projects/stadiums will lose all funding (Geelong future plans, training facilities, etc.)
- Government will apply pressure to restrict access to government assets - again stadiums
- It will be a PR disaster. Melbourne footy press will still get their articles ticked off by head office as usual. The rest of Australia will have a field day.
- The new nation of Western Australia will notice the cracks appearing between states and will cross the border.
- Ultimately it will end in civil war and Ben Cousins will be pronounced the new king of a unified Australia.
Will the rest of Australia have a "field day" due to the lack of stadiums?
- West Australia will lose any funding for their new stadium. They will ultimately secede.
- Any other projects/stadiums will lose all funding (Geelong future plans, training facilities, etc.)
- Government will apply pressure to restrict access to government assets - again stadiums
- It will be a PR disaster. Melbourne footy press will still get their articles ticked off by head office as usual. The rest of Australia will have a field day.
- The new nation of Western Australia will notice the cracks appearing between states and will cross the border.
- Ultimately it will end in civil war and Ben Cousins will be pronounced the new king of a unified Australia.
- West Australia will lose any funding for their new stadium. They will ultimately secede.
- Any other projects/stadiums will lose all funding (Geelong future plans, training facilities, etc.)
- Government will apply pressure to restrict access to government assets - again stadiums
- It will be a PR disaster. Melbourne footy press will still get their articles ticked off by head office as usual. The rest of Australia will have a field day.
- The new nation of Western Australia will notice the cracks appearing between states and will cross the border.
- Ultimately it will end in civil war and Ben Cousins will be pronounced the new king of a unified Australia.