Strategy What to do with pick 1 now we’ve got it - Do We Need Reid or is it Curtins

Keep pick 1, or trade it?


  • Total voters
    397
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've had enough of all of these kents already.

Nothing would satisfy me more right now than drafting H.Reid and watch him kick a bag against the tin-rattlers.


And anyone else wanting to entertain splitting the pick in this massively compromised draft needs to give themselves an uppercut as well.
 
Also, why do these writers think WCE would be desperate for Curtin to replace Hurn? Yes, they may rate him as the second best player in the draft and would take him as best available if we were holding pick 2 but we don't hold pick 2, we hold pick 1.

1 - Pretty sure that's what Witherden was traded in for. Ok, he's not as good as Hurn but his defending markedly improved this year, as did his kicking.

2 - We have Hough, who could perform a similar role if he doesn't move up to the wing. Having Cole back helps immensely also.

3 - Duggan plays a similar role across HB

4 - Burgiel's coming through, albeit more as a pacey rebounding half back player.

5 - Still have to fit Gov, Barrass, Bazzo, Jones, Rotham & HEdwards in somewhere(obviously not all players will fit in). Tell why TF WCE would prioritise another backman over Reid?
Eagles are getting smashed at stoppages and contested ball. Solution? Lets draft a back flanker. Genius!

All they are looking at is what teams can offer for Reid without even considering what the Eagles need.
If we need a replacement for Hurn then Hardemann may be available at 19 who was WA captain and is a similiar size and role as Hurn. Otherwise lets wait until we don't have #1 to pick a defender.

"Imagine Reid joining the likes of Harry Sheezel, George Wardlaw, Luke Davies-Uniacke, Tarryn Thomas, Will Phillips and Jy Simpkin under the tutelage of Alastair Clarkson?"
I'd rather imagine him in the blue and yellow thanks. Reid, Ginbey, Hewett will be the cornerstone of the rebuild.

I'm getting more and more sure we are going to draft him. The media can't put together a single compelling article or reason for us to trade.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

From the Melb board. WTF

How about something like this trade probably need couple other picks somewhere thoughts?


Melbourne send 5, 15, 34 to west coast 3532pts for pick 1, west coast send 15, 19 2060pts to Gold Coast for pick 4 2034pts, west coast send 4, 5 =3912pts to north for pic 2 & 16 = 3584pts

melbourne pick 1

west coast pick 2 & 16

north pick 4 & 5

I heard a totally different scenario...

Would the eagles trade pick 1 for picks 4 and 5?










Interesting... People should listen to this from the 6 minutes and 50 seconds onwards....

Demons doing a massive plan to get pick 1.

1st move....

trade Grundy , pick 24 and 34 to the swans for pick 11, 30 and 41.
that leaves the demons with 5, 11, 15, 30, 41 and 89.

2nd trade, trade 15, 30 and 41 to Gold coast for their pick 4.

Then trade picks 4 and 5 to the eagles for pick 1.
 
I heard a totally different scenario...

Would the eagles trade pick 1 for picks 4 and 5?










Interesting... People should listen to this from the 6 minutes and 50 seconds onwards....

Demons doing a massive plan to get pick 1.

1st move....

trade Grundy , pick 24 and 34 to the swans for pick 11, 30 and 41.
that leaves the demons with 5, 11, 15, 30, 41 and 89.

2nd trade, trade 15, 30 and 41 to Gold coast for their pick 4.

Then trade picks 4 and 5 to the eagles for pick 1.

No thanks.
 
I heard a totally different scenario...

Would the eagles trade pick 1 for picks 4 and 5?










Interesting... People should listen to this from the 6 minutes and 50 seconds onwards....

Demons doing a massive plan to get pick 1.

1st move....

trade Grundy , pick 24 and 34 to the swans for pick 11, 30 and 41.
that leaves the demons with 5, 11, 15, 30, 41 and 89.

2nd trade, trade 15, 30 and 41 to Gold coast for their pick 4.

Then trade picks 4 and 5 to the eagles for pick 1.

As I responded on the draft board to your post, I still wouldn't be doing this, due to being at the mercy of whoever North & Hawks pick. If North get band 3 for McKay, this trade proposition will go straight in the bin.
 
I heard a totally different scenario...

Would the eagles trade pick 1 for picks 4 and 5?










Interesting... People should listen to this from the 6 minutes and 50 seconds onwards....

Demons doing a massive plan to get pick 1.

1st move....

trade Grundy , pick 24 and 34 to the swans for pick 11, 30 and 41.
that leaves the demons with 5, 11, 15, 30, 41 and 89.

2nd trade, trade 15, 30 and 41 to Gold coast for their pick 4.

Then trade picks 4 and 5 to the eagles for pick 1.


No
 
I heard a totally different scenario...

Would the eagles trade pick 1 for picks 4 and 5?










Interesting... People should listen to this from the 6 minutes and 50 seconds onwards....

Demons doing a massive plan to get pick 1.

1st move....

trade Grundy , pick 24 and 34 to the swans for pick 11, 30 and 41.
that leaves the demons with 5, 11, 15, 30, 41 and 89.

2nd trade, trade 15, 30 and 41 to Gold coast for their pick 4.

Then trade picks 4 and 5 to the eagles for pick 1.


I first mentioned weeks ago that Melbourne will go hard for pick 1. Dees will also need to include another first rounder and Eagles may take a gander.
 
I first mentioned weeks ago that Melbourne will go hard for pick 1. Dees will also need to include another first rounder and Eagles may take a gander.
I'd rather we not take a gander, we've got enough geese on the list currently.
 
I first mentioned weeks ago that Melbourne will go hard for pick 1. Dees will also need to include another first rounder and Eagles may take a gander.

Ok.....

So if the demons offered picks 4, 5 and demons future 2024 1st rounder, would it be looked at?
 
I'd rather we not take a gander, we've got enough geese on the list currently.

It's creeping to what the Eagles would want.

If Demons get to draft night 4, 5, 11 and F1 they'll get antsy.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It's creeping to what the Eagles would want.

If Demons get to draft night 4, 5, 11 and F1 they'll get antsy.
Hope they enjoy their haul.

I'll enjoy Reid and Hewett-Ginbey-Long transforming our midfield.

What would we even get with those picks - Duursma and Watson? A speculative midfielder at best and a small forward? Pass.
 
Hope they enjoy their haul.

I'll enjoy Reid and Hewett-Ginbey-Long transforming our midfield.

What would we even get with those picks - Duursma and Watson? A speculative midfielder at best and a small forward? Pass.

Yep
 
Hope they enjoy their haul.

I'll enjoy Reid and Hewett-Ginbey-Long transforming our midfield.

What would we even get with those picks - Duursma and Watson? A speculative midfielder at best and a small forward? Pass.
Honestly we probably wouldn’t even get them. Not sure Watson is on the radar for us and Duursma getting heavily linked to the Hawks. It’d be something like O’Sullivan and Wilson based on the current rankings
 
When Reid and Dusty first meet and come together for a don’t argue contest >>>>
dlj7je-fe559c74-e940-4684-9a69-b0ff366a800f.gif
 
I heard a totally different scenario...

Would the eagles trade pick 1 for picks 4 and 5?










Interesting... People should listen to this from the 6 minutes and 50 seconds onwards....

Demons doing a massive plan to get pick 1.

1st move....

trade Grundy , pick 24 and 34 to the swans for pick 11, 30 and 41.
that leaves the demons with 5, 11, 15, 30, 41 and 89.

2nd trade, trade 15, 30 and 41 to Gold coast for their pick 4.

Then trade picks 4 and 5 to the eagles for pick 1.


Is that really a big plan considering we could outbid them for the Suns pick 4 lol? That pick wouldn’t even guarantee us Curtin or McKercher either.
 
Guys please stop freaking out about that trade proposal, the guy on the show who presented it thinks GC would give up pick 4 for a 100 points upgrade lol, we could outbid the Dees if we wanted to

Also, Sydney wouldn’t give up their first for Grundy even if they got picks back.

I’m pretty confident we’re not dumb enough to trade pick 1 for 4 and 5 which would actually be 6 and 7 on draft night anyway. There’s no chance Curtin or McKercher get through to then.

However, if North do not get 3 for McKay, unfortunately I could see us considering a deal similar to that.
 
I heard a totally different scenario...

Would the eagles trade pick 1 for picks 4 and 5?










Interesting... People should listen to this from the 6 minutes and 50 seconds onwards....

Demons doing a massive plan to get pick 1.

1st move....

trade Grundy , pick 24 and 34 to the swans for pick 11, 30 and 41.
that leaves the demons with 5, 11, 15, 30, 41 and 89.

2nd trade, trade 15, 30 and 41 to Gold coast for their pick 4.

Then trade picks 4 and 5 to the eagles for pick 1.


The real problem is that if North get pick 3 for the McKay compo, those picks will be 6 and 7.

Reid (Melbourne), Walter (GC matched bid), Curtin (North), McKercher (North), Duursma (Hawks) all gone.

Leaves Watson and Caddy for us? They're the two biggest flight risks in the draft.

We'd miss out on the best player in the draft, and the guy we're really keen on to get what exactly? This is the question people expecting us to trade pick one aren't answering.

Now if North don't get pick 3 and it looks like Curtin will slide to 5, then there might be a reason for the Eagles to consider it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top