What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

Wasn't she the one who called senator Nampijinpa Price 'useful coloured help'?

A racist calling another person racist makes the rest of the letter hypocritical garbage.
Hypocritical or not, the point of the article still stands. Dutton doesn't hide the fact that he doesn't like people of differing backgrounds. Has a long history of making it so obvious. Which is what the point of the post is. I mean I could have just post every single incident/quote by him, one by one and spam the thread. Or I can just use one article which covers most of his s**t comments to give a brief and easier summary on who he is.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't she the one who called senator Nampijinpa Price 'useful coloured help'?

A racist calling another person racist makes the rest of the letter hypocritical garbage.
I think we can leave the indigenous community to decide who within them is being racist to others in the group.

(Do you also have problems with African Americans using the N word? Going to be a long day if so.)

Also, it was shown beyond any doubt that Indigenous-dominant electorates overwhelmingly voted Yes to the Voice to Parliament, so forget any notion that Nampijinpa Price speaks with any authority from out of the indigenous community.

Anyway, bottom line is it’s hard to see why anyone would disagree with Langton’s message. Seems pretty meat and potatoes to me.
 
I think we can leave the indigenous community to decide who within them is being racist to others in the group.

(Do you also have problems with African Americans using the N word? Going to be a long day if so.)

Also, it was shown beyond any doubt that Indigenous-dominant electorates overwhelmingly voted Yes to the Voice to Parliament, so forget any notion that Nampijinpa Price speaks with any authority from out of the indigenous community.

Anyway, bottom line is it’s hard to see why anyone would disagree with Langton’s message. Seems pretty meat and potatoes to me.
Haha, ok..... So indigenous Australians call each other 'coloured help' as a greeting????

Unfortunately she proved herself to be every bit as racist as those she tries to rally against, when someone dares to have an opposing opinion. It is a very common trait among the left!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

[emoji6][emoji[emoji6]]" data-quote="Gough" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
Dutton won't attend a ceremony to mark the [emoji6]th of January alongside the PM but is happy to attend one marking the liberation of Auschwitz alongside him. He's such a snake.

No, he attended ceremonies in his electorate as per the past twenty years.. how terrible


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Dutton won't attend a ceremony to mark the 26th of January alongside the PM but is happy to attend one marking the liberation of Auschwitz alongside him. He's such a snake.
He attended an Australia Day ceremony in his own electorate, as he has always done.
He attended the liberation of Auschwitz ceremony with Albo,because that was the only liberation of Auschwitz ceremony.
Pretty simple.
 
Haha, ok..... So indigenous Australians call each other 'coloured help' as a greeting????
No, not as a greeting, but I can absolutely see it being used as a rhetorical term. Indigenous Australians are tough people and they can take it as well as dish it out.
Unfortunately she proved herself to be every bit as racist as those she tries to rally against, when someone dares to have an opposing opinion.
Your opinion only.

It is a very common trait among the left!
I’ll grant you that. The right wing tend to be more shameless and blatant in their racism.

I’m interested, what exactly in Langton’s message troubles you? She is presumably speaking from lived experience, unless you can present evidence it’s all lies or fantasies.

So what in what appears to be just plain statements of reality is causing you such unease?
 
No, not as a greeting, but I can absolutely see it being used as a rhetorical term. Indigenous Australians are tough people and they can take it as well as dish it out.

Your opinion only.


I’ll grant you that. The right wing tend to be more shameless and blatant in their racism.

I’m interested, what exactly in Langton’s message troubles you? She is presumably speaking from lived experience, unless you can present evidence it’s all lies or fantasies.

So what in what appears to be just plain statements of reality is causing you such unease?
How would she know why senator Nampijinpa Price has been selected to be senior within the LNP. To infer that it is due to her skin colour rather than her aptitude is just racism.

A racist is a racist, and should not be defended. She is a racist, not different to right wing racists!!

Shame on you for trying to defend her!
 
How would she know why senator Nampijinpa Price has been selected to be senior within the LNP. To infer that it is due to her skin colour rather than her aptitude is just racism.

A racist is a racist, and should not be defended. She is a racist, not different to right wing racists!!

Shame on you for trying to defend her!
OK, clear, thanks, so your whole objection to Langton's post is not to do with anything it says, you're simply shooting the messenger because of one (highly contestable) objection you have to something she once said, so you feel you no longer have to address anything Langton says.

And I thought it was the left that were supposed to be so big on silencing and cancelling.

Anyway, I'm outta here. Have a great day.
 
OK, clear, thanks, so your whole objection to Langton's post is not to do with anything it says, you're simply shooting the messenger because of one (highly contestable) objection you have to something she once said, so you feel you no longer have to address anything Langton says.

And I thought it was the left that were supposed to be so big on silencing and cancelling.

Anyway, I'm outta here. Have a great day.
I am merely stating that a diatribe from a racist about another person being a racist probably doesn't hold a huge amount of value.

Hope you have a good day too
 
He attended an Australia Day ceremony in his own electorate, as he has always done.
He attended the liberation of Auschwitz ceremony with Albo,because that was the only liberation of Auschwitz ceremony.
Pretty simple.

And by the sounds of it he made the right choice


0def95200913e36c13db05e9659b0f88.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

And by the sounds of it he made the right choice


0def95200913e36c13db05e9659b0f88.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Link would be good.

Though I have this strange feeling that I already know who wrote that putrid material.

His disdain for cultural titles is amazing.
For such an intelligent individual you'd think he'd know what is meant by the use of the word "deadly".
 
Last edited:
I must say it is hilarious that on Australia Day certain sections would rather not acknowledgement of those who came before.

Kind of clearly demonstrates what type of individual we have in our midst.

Oh no they sung part of the Australian National anthem in Indigenous language. Won't someone think of the poor children!!!

Sounds like Australia Day is only meant for certain sections of Australia to some.
 
And the fact that this Welcome so upset Bolt tells me everything.

 
I must say it is hilarious that on Australia Day certain sections would rather not acknowledgement of those who came before.

Kind of clearly demonstrates what type of individual we have in our midst.

Oh no they sung part of the Australian National anthem in Indigenous language. Won't someone think of the poor children!!!

Sounds like Australia Day is only meant for certain sections of Australia to some.

Very pointed comment. Murdoch press would have you believe it’s the flag and three Bs. Beer Beach Bikinis
 
And the fact that this Welcome so upset Bolt tells me everything.

The 26th is meant to be a White Australia Day in his eyes.
 
Dutton has denied that the proposed Australian Department of Government Efficiency is a copy of Trump's department. Does he think we're stupid?

Why did I even ask? The answer is yes.

But it's what Gina wants....

1737947276899.png
 
Please..... Use your own analytical skills. The scheme cost approx $1b (not to mention the $1.5b to rectify issues), and there were 4 deaths. 1 death every $250m of construction value.

So, is we extrapolated that, to say, suburban rail loop, would it be acceptable for 128 young workers to die on that job?
Now you please use your analytical skills.

If the CSIRO found that the death rate during the pink batts scheme was lower than the industry rate before the scheme, and as you say, that would be an alarming death rate if extrapolated to say, railway workers, well then clearly roof insulation installation is an extremely hazardous occupation.

You can certainly make the case that if it is so dangerous, government needs to look very closely at what can be done to improve worker safety in that industry (something unions are quite strong on; funny that).

But at the end of the day, the pink batts scheme death rate was lower.

Borne out by the fact that of the eight separate enquiries into the scheme - several of them instigated by the Coalition and extremely politically motivated - none of them found that Rudd Labor had a case to answer on worker safety.
 
Now you please use your analytical skills.

If the CSIRO found that the death rate during the pink batts scheme was lower than the industry rate before the scheme, and as you say, that would be an alarming death rate if extrapolated to say, railway workers, well then clearly roof insulation installation is an extremely hazardous occupation.

You can certainly make the case that if it is so dangerous, government needs to look very closely at what can be done to improve worker safety in that industry (something unions are quite strong on; funny that).

But at the end of the day, the pink batts scheme death rate was lower.

Borne out by the fact that of the eight separate enquiries into the scheme - several of them instigated by the Coalition and extremely politically motivated - none of them found that Rudd Labor had a case to answer on worker safety.
It's amusing how you quote a CSIRO study (why are they suddenly a construction industry statistics expert), rather than the royal commissions you keep referencing:

The deaths of four installers participating in the Rudd government’s home insulation program would not have occurred if the scheme had been properly designed and implemented, a royal commission has found.

Commissioner Ian Hanger has slated the Labor government’s haste, bad design and lack of safety in the A$2.7 billion program, which was a key part of the $42 billion February 2009 stimulus package to protect the economy against the global financial crisis
.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top