Degree in scientology
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Arts degrees are usele......
Damn, beaten by post #1.
Arts degrees are mulch.
Yes and Arts make you less than special. It makes you a cook at McDonalds.
Uh......no. Arts is still the shitbrick of the tertiary world and forever will be.
LOL someone doesn't like Arts degrees.
I think it depends really on what you do the Arts degree for. For instance Arts with a diploma education can lead to a good career in teaching. Major in International relations/development (or politics) and there are many gov and non gov organisations you can work for in policy development or other similar areas.
Just a basic Arts degree in sociology or creative writing, cinema studies etc.. sure there isn't much scope in that without further studies or exceptional skill in a specific area. But to tar everyone that does Arts with the same brush (ie: all drop kicks/no career prospects) is pretty ignorant and elitist.
So what do you study???
Anything with a diploma can lead to teaching. And if you specifically want to become a bureaucrat, why would you do Arts when you could do Law or International Relations? The point is that there is no job out there for which Arts is ideal, or even preferred.LOL someone doesn't like Arts degrees.
I think it depends really on what you do the Arts degree for. For instance Arts with a diploma education can lead to a good career in teaching. Major in International relations/development (or politics) and there are many gov and non gov organisations you can work for in policy development or other similar areas.
Just a basic Arts degree in sociology or creative writing, cinema studies etc.. sure there isn't much scope in that without further studies or exceptional skill in a specific area. But to tar everyone that does Arts with the same brush (ie: all drop kicks/no career prospects) is pretty ignorant and elitist.
yep, you are right imo, theology is useless and I definitely do not want to be a priestYeah and no - if you wanna be a priest you do it to get a job. Not that much more useless than a humanities degree in any other respects.
Most useful would be Dr or real scientist IMO.
It's obvious isn't it.
Doesn't take away from my points. For example, a couple of my friends have an IT degree, hated it. Did (Arts) Education and now happily primary school teachers.
But to ask someone whats the better degree IT or Arts? Nine times out of ten they'd say IT. For some people it really isn't.
You study all the same stuff as any other arts degree, languages, literature, history and philosophy. It's still pretty popular in the UK for example.yep, you are right imo, theology is useless and I definitely do not want to be a priest
I enjoyed my PPE for what it's worth.
Keep on diggin' MB...Anything with a diploma can lead to teaching. And if you specifically want to become a bureaucrat, why would you do Arts when you could do Law or International Relations? The point is that there is no job out there for which Arts is ideal, or even preferred.
Your post reeks of someone trying desperately to rationalise a poor choice.
And for an Arts student to label someone else elitist is quite amusing (not that Arts students have a monopoly on smugness, but they do have a majority I'd say). I don't consider either of my degrees to be elite actually- I consider STEM degrees, particularly medicine and engineering to be elite degrees. Law is now just a glorified Arts degree, that's my point.
Politics, Philosophy and Economics.Personal Protective Equipment?
Anything constructive to say?Keep on diggin' MB...
I enjoyed my PPE for what it's worth.
Anything with a diploma can lead to teaching. And if you specifically want to become a bureaucrat, why would you do Arts when you could do Law or International Relations? The point is that there is no job out there for which Arts is ideal, or even preferred.
Your post reeks of someone trying desperately to rationalise a poor choice.
And for an Arts student to label someone else elitist is quite amusing (not that Arts students have a monopoly on smugness, but they do have a majority I'd say). I don't consider either of my degrees to be elite actually- I consider STEM degrees, particularly medicine and engineering to be elite degrees. Law is now just a glorified Arts degree, that's my point.
Blinkered view much? And Law doesn't teach you critical thinking or problem solving skills either? Law graduates are used to competition, you will find very few Law graduates that don't have a host of ECs at the same time.I'll take an Arts grad with well honed critical thinking, problem solving abilities, collaborative mindset and creativity over just another another Law grad with little else to offer professionally than the fact they were able to jump through the appropriate hoops at University.
Yeah, it's great IMO. Lots of focus on normative positions and teaching you to use the data as a starting point - rather than just speaking to the data or even worse just jamming the data in where it fits, like a political "scientist".That is sort of what I had in mind when I started Arts, as its the only real pathway for a mature student.
Blinkered view much? And Law doesn't teach you critical thinking or problem solving skills either?
And teaching is simply a matter of getting a grad dip, pointless to bring that up in the context of making Arts more attractive.
Completely miss the point much?
Never let facts get in the way of a good Law student rant against Arts degrees
When you write "just another Law grad with little else to offer professionally than the fact they were able to jump through the appropriate hoops at University" you are inferring that these students are the norm, rather than the exception. The skills you described are inherantly taught, to a higher degree, in law than in Arts. I have degrees in both humanities and in law, so at least I am speaking from personal experience. You do not appear (as far as I can tell from your post) to have studied law, so I'm not sure how you can arrive at such a conclusion.Completely miss the point much? I was saying that a whole bunch of other factors about the candidate are just as crucial, if not moreso than the piece of paper. Was simply saying that in a contest between an exceptionally capable candidate with a suitable Arts degree and a merel average candidate with a Law degree, I don't think the academic credentials are going to be the decisive factor for me. (Unless I am hiring a lawyer).
The basis for getting any degree is to enhance one's employment prospects. Simple as that. And getting an Arts degree is a waste of time when there are other specific degrees which teach both the skills you describe as well as providing technical knowledge or a grounding in the profession.Indeed, a valid counterpoint if that was indeed the context. Shame that it wasn't. I was merely countering the perspective expressed by some posters here that "Arts degree = complete waste of time".
You appear to have erroneously seen my post as some pissing contest between Arts and Law degrees (and responded accordingly) when it wasn't anything of the sort. Not even close.
Is that all you've got in response? Come on man, you can do better than just give up.Yeahhhhh... You've gone and missed the point again.
Seems others got what I was saying.