Goober still available.... just saying.
I think he's batting for the Yankee's. ( 4:20 ).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Goober still available.... just saying.
It’s me and Goobers mum tonight
It's not actually official yet.Is Boydie gonna get a welcome to the Saints thread? he’s official now is t he??????
He's taken list position 40 odd.. It's insurance & better to have some than none..There was a fella who played a game or two with similar attributes.. The one attribute that we don't value though & is underestimated is physical presence.. That player with similiar attributes.... Shane Mumford.. I'm led to believe his teammates walked just slightly taller with him on the ground..Nankervis (Richmond) is another example.. Back the club & back the player ...They've drafted a kid with talent so we've covered our bases as best as possible..I just finished watching Boyd play in the losing GF against Glenelg. He had a pretty decent game, there is no doubt he is good at his ruck craft, but he offers very little else. He is a big lump who has benefited by the rucking rule changes, he just stands on the line and steps into the opposing ruckmans run and blocks them with his size/strength. He never attempts to jump he just stands and fights for the fall of the ball space. He also uses those same strengths to snatch the ball out of the air and bang it forward, hence his clearance numbers. We know what happened when Marshall did that, it mostly ended up in a turn overs.
Whether he can do the same at the next level with bigger, stronger and smarter opponents is questionable. Opposition ruckman will either out muscle him or jump over him, and in open play he will struggle to stay with hard running opponents. Good ruckman are rare and very hard to find and I do prefer ruckman who can mark, run and contribute around the ground, hence my concerns re Boyd.
Ill concede as a basic ruckman (if ypu are happy with nothing else) he may be competitive, but he will offer zero around the ground. He is the complete opposite of the modern day athletic ruckman. If RTB can turn him into something great, but I still have my reservations.
The recruiters would have watched a lot more games, vision and had access to data of all the prospective recruits. Numerous posters have been quite forthright in their opinions of certain top 10 or 20 recruits. Strongly suggesting they dont want certain players for differing reasons, whats so outrageous or different with my suggesting I dont want another list filler?
I just finished watching Boyd play in the losing GF against Glenelg. He had a pretty decent game, there is no doubt he is good at his ruck craft, but he offers very little else. He is a big lump who has benefited by the rucking rule changes, he just stands on the line and steps into the opposing ruckmans run and blocks them with his size/strength. He never attempts to jump he just stands and fights for the fall of the ball space. He also uses those same strengths to snatch the ball out of the air and bang it forward, hence his clearance numbers. We know what happened when Marshall did that, it mostly ended up in a turn overs.
Whether he can do the same at the next level with bigger, stronger and smarter opponents is questionable. Opposition ruckman will either out muscle him or jump over him, and in open play he will struggle to stay with hard running opponents. Good ruckman are rare and very hard to find and I do prefer ruckman who can mark, run and contribute around the ground, hence my concerns re Boyd.
Ill concede as a basic ruckman (if ypu are happy with nothing else) he may be competitive, but he will offer zero around the ground. He is the complete opposite of the modern day athletic ruckman. If RTB can turn him into something great, but I still have my reservations.
The recruiters would have watched a lot more games, vision and had access to data of all the prospective recruits. Numerous posters have been quite forthright in their opinions of certain top 10 or 20 recruits. Strongly suggesting they dont want certain players for differing reasons, whats so outrageous or different with my suggesting I dont want another list filler?