Boris the Contradiction
Cancelled
I think it's become pretty obvious in the last couple of weeks that Heath Shaw and Alan Didak, in form, are our most important players.
If I had to name our best players it would come from one of (in no particular order):
-Didak, Davis, Swan, Medhurst, Pendlebury
BUT I think it is evident in the difference between our team in the last couple of weeks and the Carlton game (and most of our really bad games) how important these two are. With our game plan and structure; these two seem to be the ones that make us click and they are always dominant in our really big wins. Shaw played but was in career worst form against carlton (didak was out) and we couldn't get the ball out of defence/rebound and we never looked dangerous coming into our forward 50. All of this despite being pretty even in inside 50s and clearances. This isn't new either, it is a pattern.
We have our most bight/cutting edge inside 50 when dids is there because of his delivery and his cleverness, cunning and vision. Shaw just makes us so dangerous rebounding off half back and when he's out/down/closed down we get swamped. We generally do well in the centre these days either winning or breaking even in the clearances and this makes the other 2 facets even more important.
Medhurst and Davis are our game breakers and are the most likely to win a game off their own boots but they are not as important as these two.
Who does everyone else see as our most important? Who are our best?
*As a side note; I think it is worrying that Davis generally plays his best/most dominant footy when Didak is out. Davis was travelling well last year and then when Didak went out he exploded. This year he has been in the best 3 or 4 mids in the comp all season and as soon as Didak comes back; his form drops, severely. It's weird and it goes back further than those examples. What do other people think?
If I had to name our best players it would come from one of (in no particular order):
-Didak, Davis, Swan, Medhurst, Pendlebury
BUT I think it is evident in the difference between our team in the last couple of weeks and the Carlton game (and most of our really bad games) how important these two are. With our game plan and structure; these two seem to be the ones that make us click and they are always dominant in our really big wins. Shaw played but was in career worst form against carlton (didak was out) and we couldn't get the ball out of defence/rebound and we never looked dangerous coming into our forward 50. All of this despite being pretty even in inside 50s and clearances. This isn't new either, it is a pattern.
We have our most bight/cutting edge inside 50 when dids is there because of his delivery and his cleverness, cunning and vision. Shaw just makes us so dangerous rebounding off half back and when he's out/down/closed down we get swamped. We generally do well in the centre these days either winning or breaking even in the clearances and this makes the other 2 facets even more important.
Medhurst and Davis are our game breakers and are the most likely to win a game off their own boots but they are not as important as these two.
Who does everyone else see as our most important? Who are our best?
*As a side note; I think it is worrying that Davis generally plays his best/most dominant footy when Didak is out. Davis was travelling well last year and then when Didak went out he exploded. This year he has been in the best 3 or 4 mids in the comp all season and as soon as Didak comes back; his form drops, severely. It's weird and it goes back further than those examples. What do other people think?