Who will be premiers?

Remove this Banner Ad

Wasn't having at go at Freo mate - just making a very valid point. I remember the same comments from Freo guys at the time. Was all about who they had missing, nothing about ours. It also ignored the fact that Pav was completely out of form at the start of the season anyway.

Apparently Sewell (despite being BOG in a GF and RU B&F the previous season) and Lake (AA FB) aren't good players. Guerra either. Losing your main KPD early in a game is never a loss either. We were lucky to win.

The same Sewell that was dropped 6 weeks back? Lake is living off of form from 5 years ago. Both are washed up. Schoenmakers is a dud.

Making a comparison between champion players that are still relevant, and washed up decent players, isn't really valid.
 
The same Sewell that was dropped 6 weeks back? Lake is living off of form from 5 years ago. Both are washed up. Schoenmakers is a dud.

Making a comparison between champion players that are still relevant, and washed up decent players, isn't really valid.

We played you 20 weeks back though didn't we, not 6? Haven't watched Lake this year? He's as washed up as Sandilands. Schoenmakers was in great form. Had already destroyed Hawkins and Darling in the first few rounds. Either way, good or bad, he was out No.1 KPD in that day and was off early - why couldn't Freo exploit that?

As I said, we were obviously lucky. Just like on Friday night - we once again stumbled over the line with some good ordinary players out.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Had already destroyed Hawkins and Darling in the first few rounds. Either way, good or bad, he was out No.1 KPD in that day and was off early - why couldn't Freo exploit that?

Destroying Darling, wow what a superstar. We lost Bradley and Pavlich in our weakest area of our list, we had no one to exploit it.
 
The same Sewell that was dropped 6 weeks back? Lake is living off of form from 5 years ago. Both are washed up. Schoenmakers is a dud.

Making a comparison between champion players that are still relevant, and washed up decent players, isn't really valid.

Jeez you're an angry little muffin.

I cant for the life of me figure out why. Menopause?
 
Destroying Darling, wow what a superstar. We lost Bradley and Pavlich in our weakest area of our list, we had no one to exploit it.

Jeez you blokes. Dis' on Darling and then make a point of Kepler who being out.... Rag on Sewell cos he got dropped even though Pav hadn't had a kick until that point of the season himself. Rag on Lake being yesterday's man when Sandi barely done a thing for 3 years.

You guys just don't get it. If it makes you feel better that you lost because you had a few players out then who am I to argue.

As for this thread - you may well be Premiers. Good luck.
 
Jeez you blokes. Dis' on Darling and then make a point of Kepler who being out.... Rag on Sewell cos he got dropped even though Pav hadn't had a kick until that point of the season himself. Rag on Lake being yesterday's man when Sandi barely done a thing for 3 years.

You guys just don't get it. If it makes you feel better that you lost because you had a few players out then who am I to argue.

As for this thread - you may well be Premiers. Good luck.

Bradley is an important point because it's part of our list we lack depth in. Pavlich has only been out because of injury, he's improved our forwardline massively since game 1 of his return, kicking 100+ points in games we struggled to do so before he came in. Sewell isn't as significant.

Sandi comes in and we DESTROYED Geelong in the ruck, it wasn't close and a deciding factor in the game.
 
Destroying Darling, wow what a superstar. We lost Bradley and Pavlich in our weakest area of our list, we had no one to exploit it.

I am tipping the Dockers will beat the Cats in the final.

Dream on, there's no way you'll be beating Geelong.

The same Sewell that was dropped 6 weeks back? Lake is living off of form from 5 years ago. Both are washed up. Schoenmakers is a dud.

Making a comparison between champion players that are still relevant, and washed up decent players, isn't really valid.


Bunch of 12 year's old here...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Bradley is an important point because it's part of our list we lack depth in. Pavlich has only been out because of injury, he's improved our forwardline massively since game 1 of his return, kicking 100+ points in games we struggled to do so before he came in. Sewell isn't as significant.

Sandi comes in and we DESTROYED Geelong in the ruck, it wasn't close and a deciding factor in the game.

Bradley is an important part of your side. But if your fellow Freo poster is discounting the quality of Sewell, Lake, Guerra and Schoenmakers you can be sure you're getting none for Bradley.

We played you in Round 4. Pav missed that game but had been playing poorly until that point of the season. It has nothing to do with what he's done since he's been back. No one doubts how good he has been. I just countered the other guy's Q on Sewell's form with the same issue about Pav. He hadn't had a kick in the games leading up to our Round 4 meeting.

So what? Lake destroyed Tippett. I think you're missing the point. I never doubted the quality of your outs when we played. It was your poster who questioned ours.
 
Sorry for tipping a team who has beaten who in the last 11 occasions to beat you, mate. I hope I didn't cut you too bad.

why?
Because he has tipped a team which Hawthorn has not beaten in 11 attempts?


No young fellas.

It was the far fetched deceleration that there was 'no way' Hawthorn would beat Geelong.

Go do your homework..
 
How switched on are the Hawks? Partially, marginally, not at all.........

They Don't impress me as much as Freo.. I think Freo will romp it home and to be honest im not 100% certain the hawks will make it past the preliminary final. I only said that because they seem slightly better then Port or Geelong depending on which one you play..
 
Bradley is an important part of your side. But if your fellow Freo poster is discounting the quality of Sewell, Lake, Guerra and Schoenmakers you can be sure you're getting none for Bradley.

We played you in Round 4. Pav missed that game but had been playing poorly until that point of the season. It has nothing to do with what he's done since he's been back. No one doubts how good he has been. I just countered the other guy's Q on Sewell's form with the same issue about Pav. He hadn't had a kick in the games leading up to our Round 4 meeting.

So what? Lake destroyed Tippett. I think you're missing the point. I never doubted the quality of your outs when we played. It was your poster who questioned ours.

Fair enough I haven't been following the context of the conversation, just that Freo DID have important outs that game and a rematch against Hawthorn may not go as one sided as our first encounter.
 
Well you've found no way to beat Geelong in your last 11 outings so why should I tip them to somehow find a way on the 12th?

Listen in champ i'll try and make it a bit easier to understand for someone like yourself.

It's entirely your opinion that Geelong will beat Hawthorn should they get that far, and that very well may happen and there's nothing wrong with that.

But that doesn't mean you can say Hawthorn are 'no chance' and shout someone down for thinking the Hawks will win.
 
You seem rather puzzled.

Did i not explain why the notion of your previous post was entirely false?

Head up champ.

No, you didn't explain anything, just told me and a couple of others to go "do our homework".

I'm sorry I tipped against your club again buddy, I can delete the post if you're so fussed.
 
No, you didn't explain anything, just told me and a couple of others to go "do our homework".

I'm sorry I tipped against your club again buddy, I can delete the post if you're so fussed.

Ahhhhhh young fella here you go. You made this statement -

Dream on, there's no way you'll be beating Geelong.

And after i worked out that you were a bit lost on the matter i explained to you why that was incorrect.

Listen in champ i'll try and make it a bit easier to understand for someone like yourself.

It's entirely your opinion that Geelong will beat Hawthorn should they get that far, and that very well may happen and there's nothing wrong with that.

But that doesn't mean you can say Hawthorn are 'no chance' and shout someone down for thinking the Hawks will win.


Understand now?
 
Listen in champ i'll try and make it a bit easier to understand for someone like yourself.

It's entirely your opinion that Geelong will beat Hawthorn should they get that far, and that very well may happen and there's nothing wrong with that.

But that doesn't mean you can say Hawthorn are 'no chance' and shout someone down for thinking the Hawks will win.

Don't get all up tight just because "someone like myself" said that there is no way you'll beat Geelong. You should thrive at being put under the radar and written off by a few people, it will just make it that much sweeter if the Hawks win. I'm a Sydney fan, I've been there & done that.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Who will be premiers?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top