Why are the games so long?

Remove this Banner Ad

There is no doubt that a game of footy in the modern T20/Tiktok world is too long.

It's boring.

It's unnecessary for a game of anything to take more than 80-90 minutes.

I get why it used to be relevant to be a 2 hour game, but with the rules and tactics they introduced to reduce fatigue, it's no longer really test of endurance.

Quarters should be 12 minutes long. 15 absolute max. Plus time on.

The biggest issue with AFL footy is the fixture. And the biggest hurdle with addressing the problems with the fixture is that players aren't physically capable of playing 2 games per week.

If games were far shorter, we'd get more interesting games. More exciting games. But more importantly, we'd get more games. Teams could play twice as many games, which would mean every could play each other twice.

Less running required, meaning more training time to focus on skill and execution. Fat kids that can't sprint 5k in 45 seconds or whatever could still realistically play footy at a decent level.


The main reason 50 Over cricket is dead is that the first ten over were exciting, and the last 10 were exciting. The middle 30 overs where the batting team 'consolidated' the innings was just kind of boring.

AFL footy has so much 'consolidating the innings' time.

People get bored easily these days.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The clock keeps running for the set shot.
Unspoken are also now stopping the game for less serious injuries, not just the stretcher like previously.
Other reasons are that ads breaks are now slightly longer - 45 seconds.

The game is too long. Cut ruck nominations to start with.
There definitely does seem to be more time between the ad break finishing and the ball being bounced. That may partly the score review after every goal, or maybe we get 30 second breaks and there are 45 seconds scheduled now.

Are teams getting a bit more time to set before throw-ins, to allow rucks to arrive from further away? I haven't noticed it, but it would add to time on even if just a few extra seconds each time.
 
You really notice it at games, particularly when your team is losing like my boys on Friday. It was like “ blow the *ing siren so I can * off home”

Damn bro Essendon were at least within striking distance the whole game and only 18 points down most of the last qtr. Try being an Eagles fan you would never make it to half time
 
Ruck noms/3rd man up ban ruined the game, wastes time plus the main cause of congestion
I don't see a problem with the 3rd man up, but don't care if it's a rule.

The ruck nomination is genuinely pointless though. If a team contests the ruck with more than one player, then you can just play a free against them.
 
How anyone who watched footy in 2020 could support shorter playing time is beyond me. A full game of congested sh*t footy because fatigue never sets in and the game never opens up. F**ing horrible.

To the question at hand, was there always a 1 minute (or whatever it is) break between a goal and the centre bounce to make sure broadcasters can get their desired amount of ads in? That could be a factor.

The sooner the AFL stop designing the game to meet the whim and financial incentive of broadcasters the better off the game will be.
 
There is no doubt that a game of footy in the modern T20/Tiktok world is too long.

It's boring.

It's unnecessary for a game of anything to take more than 80-90 minutes.

I get why it used to be relevant to be a 2 hour game, but with the rules and tactics they introduced to reduce fatigue, it's no longer really test of endurance.

Quarters should be 12 minutes long. 15 absolute max. Plus time on.

The biggest issue with AFL footy is the fixture. And the biggest hurdle with addressing the problems with the fixture is that players aren't physically capable of playing 2 games per week.

If games were far shorter, we'd get more interesting games. More exciting games. But more importantly, we'd get more games. Teams could play twice as many games, which would mean every could play each other twice.

Less running required, meaning more training time to focus on skill and execution. Fat kids that can't sprint 5k in 45 seconds or whatever could still realistically play footy at a decent level.


The main reason 50 Over cricket is dead is that the first ten over were exciting, and the last 10 were exciting. The middle 30 overs where the batting team 'consolidated' the innings was just kind of boring.

AFL footy has so much 'consolidating the innings' time.

People get bored easily these days.
Do you recall the 2020 season?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Why are the games so long?


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top