Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why are countries with high union memberships have higher living standards and better welfare standards than corporate run countries?
So when was this? 50 years ago?
I had a grandfather who was a heavy at the wharfs, working for the painters and dockers. His job was to punch out people who didn't strike.
Other guys wanted his well paid job and they would fight for it. He beat one guy so well, the guy died.
An uncle had the same job for the BLF and his job was to go around to families' homes and ask "are you crossing the picket tomorrow". If there was any uncertainty they would beat the worker, in front of their families, until they required hospitalisation. The whole time calling the victim a scab.
These were the same guys called in for the dirty work in Victoria as per the mob program "underbelly". They were called in as they could commit crimes and not be recognised, as they were from Adelaide.
I wonder if this is the type of living standards you refer to or whether you are confusing unionism with the importance of strong social systems.
I can't think of a time recently where unions have taken to violence in the streets or integrated their business models with outlaw organisations.........oh hang on, that's exactly how it is.
I can’t think of a time recently where the business sector lobbied the government to remove workers rights for the name of profits …. Oh hang on, that’s exactly how it is.
And that’s your answer to OP?
Norway 50% union membership
Finland 60%
Denmark 67%
Strong unions, strong welfare, strong public healthcare and strong education = happyland.
Prove me wrong.
I do believe they are great examples of nations on this planet but I think you dismiss Australia
I wouldn't trade my life for one in the nordic nations and you haven't either. I think that speaks volumes
nut is obsessed with Finland. Any question, topic, discussion will lead to Finland.
Prove me wrong. Lol.
I can't think of a time when business endangered lives for a bit of money...I can’t think of a time recently where the business sector lobbied the government to remove workers rights for the name of profits …. Oh hang on, that’s exactly how it is.
You're presented with a question about union membership being associated with high levels of happiness/prosperity, and your response is some weird anecdote from 50 years ago.I had a grandfather who was a heavy at the wharfs, working for the painters and dockers. His job was to punch out people who didn't strike.
Other guys wanted his well paid job and they would fight for it. He beat one guy so well, the guy died.
An uncle had the same job for the BLF and his job was to go around to families' homes and ask "are you crossing the picket tomorrow". If there was any uncertainty they would beat the worker, in front of their families, until they required hospitalisation. The whole time calling the victim a scab.
These were the same guys called in for the dirty work in Victoria as per the mob program "underbelly". They were called in as they could commit crimes and not be recognised, as they were from Adelaide.
I wonder if this is the type of living standards you refer to or whether you are confusing unionism with the importance of strong social systems.
You're presented with a question about union membership being associated with high levels of happiness/prosperity, and your response is some weird anecdote from 50 years ago.
How do you even perceive this as discussing in good faith?
You're presented with a question about union membership being associated with high levels of happiness/prosperity, and your response is some weird anecdote from 50 years ago.
How do you even perceive this as discussing in good faith?
Again, why are you using individual anecdotes to try discredit an argument which is shown to have significant societal benefits?I’ll give you a live example in the maritime Union
An engineer in the Pilbara called whistleblower on Union corruption
Two weeks later four union workers made a false report that Engineer assaulted a fifth union worker
One of the four witnesses was the engineers friend and was ask “how can you do this to me”. His response was “I didn’t want to end up being the next target”
Lovely
Why not? Put aside the colder weather and the lack of beaches and Scandinavian countries excel in terms of social welfare services, quality of life, harmony and happiness compared to the nations rapidly moving toward American style greed capitalism.
For the most part Scandinavians generally run their countries better than all others.
Again, why are you using individual anecdotes to try discredit an argument which is shown to have significant societal benefits?
It's like taking a single example of a seatbelt choking someone, and trying to use that example to justify seatbelts being a bad idea.
Just awful
All that happened in a corporate run countryI had a grandfather who was a heavy at the wharfs, working for the painters and dockers. His job was to punch out people who didn't strike.
Other guys wanted his well paid job and they would fight for it. He beat one guy so well, the guy died.
An uncle had the same job for the BLF and his job was to go around to families' homes and ask "are you crossing the picket tomorrow". If there was any uncertainty they would beat the worker, in front of their families, until they required hospitalisation. The whole time calling the victim a scab.
These were the same guys called in for the dirty work in Victoria as per the mob program "underbelly". They were called in as they could commit crimes and not be recognised, as they were from Adelaide.
I wonder if this is the type of living standards you refer to or whether you are confusing unionism with the importance of strong social systems.
In the "corporate run" countries nut is referring to it is 100% fact that income distribution heavily favours the wealthy - mostly thought increased distribution to corporate profits - and the divide between rich and poor is growing further every day.what your not understanding is people are people, no matter what organisation they join. Be it unions, government or big business and they are the same person whether they wear one guernsey or switch to another.
What is also well understood is organisations and people that aren't held to account, generally develop values and a culture that is unhealthy and they push beyond boundaries.
We need to celebrate the "grey man" the "grey organisation" who do wonderful things as the quiet achiever. Our worst unions, our worst companies and our worst governments should never be celebrated.
In the "corporate run" countries nut is referring to it is 100% fact that income distribution heavily favours the wealthy - mostly thought increased distribution to corporate profits - and the divide between rich and poor is growing further every day.
It is a fact that labour costs are ever diminishing as either wages are suppressed or jobs are removed all together through offshoring and automation.
And then once we have removed almost all the low skilled jobs all together, reduced the wages of what remains to a pittance, made it impossible for the working class to afford housing because housing should be an commodity for the wealthy to play with to further increase their personal wealth and widen the inequality divide, then we Robodebt them.
Corporate countries like Australia are frankly disgusting places.
All that happened in a corporate run country
What is the point of humanity if our end game is to make humanity obsolete?With AI and automation we will need to become a socialist state
And socialism is soon possible in terms of affordability because of AI and automation
The only debate is whether we will live to see it