A really interesting point. I've sometimes wondered if draft camp results are more important for prospective KPP than midfielders. Provided a midfielder has decent pace (let's say, < 3sec 20m) and decent beep test, the rest aren't really relevant. I can't see Pendles, Hodge, Bartel, Mitchell, Kirk, Black, Power, Hayes, Ball etc. etc. having any outstanding attributes on draft camp testing. Provided they're within the ballpark, can find the pill and kick/handball efficiently and effectively, the rest is somewhat moot.
I realise that we are a Collingwood board but some things aren't just black and white. A lot of players that get drafted are pretty similar when you look at them in the TAC cup or equivalent. If the player that you are looking at has a better beep test it is more likely that the skills that they do have will not drop off as the game goes along.
In the TAC cup you might be fast enough to get to the ball and use it well if you aren't in the AFL you are useless. You might be big enough that you have the cocnfidence to go hard in U18's but not in the AFL. Is Hodge bigger than Lonie? Who goes harder?
There are no indicators for this in the draft camp or their footy to date but that is why you have to just cross your fingers and hope that your coaches get the best out of the players that they have. I think that our drafting has been ok but the players that have turned out to be the good ones have been the lesser skilled ones and the higher skilled ones have not been so good, so we have a back log of lesser skilled guys.
Its like natural selection, all are born with their different advantages but the ones that survive will pass on their genes to the next generation.