Media WIGMEDIA: I Stand For Admin

Remove this Banner Ad

That assumes clubs are willing to contribute

How many votes did we have where the full 12 didn't vote?

That's a black mark on the clubs isn't it?

The simple answer though is you don't vote then your vote counts as a no, due to a non-vote being a negative gesture. We'll see how quickly clubs get involved when their choice to not vote already has a connotation.
 
Yeah I was president of a society at uni so I know how sh*t it can be.
This is the least surprising thing I've learned about someone outside of the Sweet FA.
 
I clearly said if forced I would vote, but that I would PREFER that the committee come to a decision.

Nice to misrepresent though. Situation normal.
Sorry EJW but the way you've written it reads as if it'll go to "extra time" if the vote is a tie and it's only if it's clear after much more discussion that it will remain deadlocked, you'll vote.

Do you mean that you would set a voting deadline and if it was tied when that deadline was reached, you would cast the deciding vote?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You've had to say this to three different people, reckon maybe the issue was with your delivery not our interpretation?
I reckon it's your comprehension.

It's all there in the original post.
 
Sorry EJW but the way you've written it reads as if it'll go to "extra time" if the vote is a tie and it's only if it's clear after much more discussion that it will remain deadlocked, you'll vote.

Do you mean that you would set a voting deadline and if it was tied when that deadline was reached, you would cast the deciding vote?
Yes
 
Sorry EJW but the way you've written it reads as if it'll go to "extra time" if the vote is a tie and it's only if it's clear after much more discussion that it will remain deadlocked, you'll vote.

Do you mean that you would set a voting deadline and if it was tied when that deadline was reached, you would cast the deciding vote?

I clearly said if forced I would vote, but that I would PREFER that the committee come to a decision.

Nice to misrepresent though. Situation normal.
 
It'd be madness to let every possible decision to be debated ad nauseum.

There would be reasonable deadlines as to where decisions would be expected to be made.
 
It'd be madness to let every possible decision to be debated ad nauseum.

There would be reasonable deadlines as to where decisions would be expected to be made.

I clearly said if forced I would vote, but that I would PREFER that the committee come to a decision.

Nice to misrepresent though. Situation normal.
 
I clearly said if forced I would vote, but that I would PREFER that the committee come to a decision.

Nice to misrepresent though. Situation normal.
Headless prevails!!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It'd be madness to let every possible decision to be debated ad nauseum.
About that...

Seriously though, apply the rules properly, get a new Bombers rep and the place will be running so much more smoothly.
 
It'd be madness to let every possible decision to be debated ad nauseum.

There would be reasonable deadlines as to where decisions would be expected to be made.

So basically as it is now.
 
About that...

Seriously though, apply the rules properly, get a new Bombers rep and the place will be running so much more smoothly.
 
Didn't the Committee just overrule the admin and vote down expansion?
Didn't the admin, according to the committee, go rogue first?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Media WIGMEDIA: I Stand For Admin

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top