- Sep 19, 2007
- 19,291
- 17,860
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Anaheim Ducks, PSV Eindhoven
3 Clubs within 5kms of each other, great geographic spread there AFL! Bravo! Would Richmond have made it too much or a farce by cutting it down to 1km?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Totally correct, but the financials of a de-linked model would be catastrophic in the short, medium and long term. The administrative duplication that would be required, let alone the travel expense, would be crippling. The AFL can hedge its bets via the existing structure as it can hitch a ride from the existing AFL clubs and structures (and will still lose money hand over fist, albeit it will be able to make ends meet for a few years).This is typical AFL stupidity.
Too Melbourne centric & ignoring where the growth in the women's game is.
The teams should be regional and not aligned to clubs. Qld should have three teams, Brisbane, Gold Coast & Townsville/Cairns.
It does in some parts of Queensland.I'd be very, very surprised if rugby has lower female participation rates in QLD than Aussie Rules.
This is typical AFL stupidity.
Too Melbourne centric & ignoring where the growth in the women's game is.
The teams should be regional and not aligned to clubs. Qld should have three teams, Brisbane, Gold Coast & Townsville/Cairns.
This is typical AFL stupidity.
Too Melbourne centric & ignoring where the growth in the women's game is.
The teams should be regional and not aligned to clubs. Qld should have three teams, Brisbane, Gold Coast & Townsville/Cairns.
This is typical AFL stupidity.
Too Melbourne centric & ignoring where the growth in the women's game is.
The teams should be regional and not aligned to clubs. Qld should have three teams, Brisbane, Gold Coast & Townsville/Cairns.
Call me skeptical.Totally correct, but the financials of a de-linked model would be catastrophic in the short, medium and long term. The administrative duplication that would be required, let alone the travel expense, would be crippling. The AFL can hedge its bets via the existing structure as it can hitch a ride from the existing AFL clubs and structures (and will still lose money hand over fist, albeit it will be able to make ends meet for a few years).
Access to great facilities immediately. AFL coaches to assist. Carlton in particular have a great learning environment right now. Certainly Kate Jenkins on our board has been a real win so that probably is a connections thing. I note that when the non-traditional pathway zones were announced, Carlton got a smaller, more densely populated zone closer to home that they can pour some resources into. I am just wondering if they were hoping to put work in for male and female prospects.
Certainly we hit the PR circuit hard, held clinics at Princes Park, gained an existing gun player from one of the two exhibition teams in Melbourne and Footscray as an ambassador for our bid. We just built layers into our bid to show how keen we were.
Last year we had the lowest amount of female members in the comp % of membership wise. The effort from that point has been huge. Even got a female mascot to join Captain Carlton.
The minor leagues will suffer big time. The Victorian women's league will go down the gurgler. Darebin and the likes.
I'd rather we pay our debts off first before ploughing money into an unknown product.
They still need to travel.So we get a team awesome, plenty of room in the trophy cabinet for them too.
4 games a weekend, I'm sure they can play them at twilight or at night.So in the super hot weather period?
Ok with that one, Swans didn't put in a bid.GWS - WTF? Already costing a fortune to keep them afloat.
Sponsorship is what the AFL hopes the alignments will bring. Using existing AFL brands to help pay for it.If they were sure of their product and its success. I think they are counting on AFL teams spending some of their own revenue on these clubs since they are aligned. Pretty tough baptism of fire for a Nth Qld team with no alignment. It would be nice to see a team up there eventually though.
How much of their own revenue does GWS have to spend on a new team?If they were sure of their product and its success. I think they are counting on AFL teams spending some of their own revenue on these clubs since they are aligned. Pretty tough baptism of fire for a Nth Qld team with no alignment. It would be nice to see a team up there eventually though.
More of a WTF? entrenches inequality and doesn't grow the game just a club that doesn't need any help.Collingwood - tick Northern and Eastern regions
So we get a team awesome, plenty of room in the trophy cabinet for them too.
How much of their own revenue does GWS have to spend on a new team?