CarnThePiesfor09
Team Captain
Jordan would probably not have the foot skills required for the AFL and he certainly wouldnt have the stamina required.
Sweet jesus you couldn't be more wrong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jordan would probably not have the foot skills required for the AFL and he certainly wouldnt have the stamina required.
Lot of bulltish in this thread, i had a 75cm vertical leap and I've got nothing on the best AFL players, Jarred Brennan topped 100cm at the AFL draft camp as one example.
if anybody thinks Jordan is a supreme athlete watch him chase the little bloke in my avatar down the court. Jordan competed against people chosen first and foremost because they are in the top 5% of the population height wise, athletic ability ranking a long way behind. A lot of those 7 footers he competed against could not play any other sport, remember this is a sport that had Gheorge Muresan as a 10 year player, my mum could run faster.
I played basketball for 15 years and the athleticism thing is a furphy, I could play 2 games in the one night quite easily (40 minutes) but struggled to get through a half of footy, basketball is not an endurance sport.
Yes of course jordan could play, heck we have our own big stiffs, the Cain Ackland types Jordan would dominate but the Buddies of the world, there is not a mountain of difference.
And what exactly makes you qualified to make such a comment?
A marking contest in the AFL contains many variables and there are a lot of instances were a smaller opponent is contesting for the ball...I'm not a Basketball expert but I'd imagine the domain of the key is for the power forwards and centres who are usually 7ft +...Anyone that size can should be fairly comfortable with that kind of physicality.
You're singling out one specific area of the game - in AFL there is contact in almost every situation, and generally, if not always, much more brutal than Basketball.
cheers for that.Anyone think that an 18 year old Jordan would dominate the AFL? Look at the new AFL prototypes - they very much have the NBA basketball build.
Some interesting stats in comparison to Franklin :
both are 6'6
only 3 kg's difference with Franklin being slightly heavier
Jordan's wingspan is 5 cm's wider than Buddy (amazing)
Jordan's handgrip is 3cm's longer than Buddy's
Aerobic capacity would be in Jordan's favour slightly. He would be an impossible matchup for any team and you couple this with his insane drive to win.
I watched Jordan play live in 96 and I can tell you now that he made Franklin or Goodes look like school kids. A man that size doing things that you cannot imagine against 7 footers.
So do you think with the way the game is going that an athlete like Jordan would dominate? If he came to your club, where would you play him?
Dennis Rodman - 203cm, 100kg (stated in his first biography that he had the speed to be competitive at 400m sprinting at Olympic level. Long-time rival Magic Johnson has backed up these claims about his athleticism as well. Has admitted that he loves physical pain, and was known to put his body on the line all the time, and had the strength, guts and determination to mix it up with and beat guys who were up to 8-10cm taller and 20-30kg heavier than him. He would have been interesting to see in the AFL for sure.).
And this is the dumbest thread I've ever seen on BigFooty, and that takes some doing.
The NBA features the best 450 basketballers from a population of 7 billion.
The AFL features the best 450 footballers from a population of 21 million.
Obviously those figures don't accurately reflect the number of people playing the sport, but you get my point.
How did this topic run for 230 posts?
You are a downright moron if you think basketball players were taken solely for their height. Jesus your ignorance is downright embarrassing.
Give me another reason Muresan played or Bradley was drafted no.1, Manute Bol etc Watch the Alan Iverson of old, Spud Webber, the guy in my avatar, they make the average 6'7"+ NBA player look like the stiffs they are.
This is just silly.
This is just silly.
It's equivalent to saying "look at Brent Harvey make Sandilands look like a stiff...therefore AFL players were chosen for their height!". It just doesn't follow.
So Muresan was chosen for his athleticism? Ball handling ability? Basketball nouse?
Fill me in
If you say so.
Harvey would make the average 6'7" + NBA player look like a stiff. How many of them could honestly catch Harvey on a football field with room to move.
Seriously? Over 30 metres, Lebron, Jordan etc...would absolutely murder Harvey in a footrace. It wouldn't be close.
Give me another reason Muresan played or Bradley was drafted no.1, Manute Bol etc Watch the Alan Iverson of old, Spud Webber, the guy in my avatar, they make the average 6'7"+ NBA player look like the stiffs they are.
Fwiw, Muresan was hardly the least skilled player to play the game. But obviously centres are chosen for height, much like ruckmen are chosen for height in the AFL.
Here's a fun comparison; Brennan and Natunui hold the draft camp record for vertical leap at roughly 40". In the NBA pre-draft camp since 2000, there have been roughly 40-50 players who have eclipsed a 40" vertical. This is despite the players being taller on average.
They were drafted because they had upside. They ended out being total scrubs in the NBA, highlighting how they don't draft solely on height. Seriously spud webb & Iverson weren't even that good players...I don't see what your point is