Resource www.footyjumpers.com

[Rubber Arm]

Front of collar needs to be yellow.


I probably wouldn't bother having the "2018" guernsey because they only wore the Guernsey with the current ISC collar in one game against port, then back to the old template for the rest of the season.

 

[Gibbsy]

Front of collar needs to be yellow.
View attachment 979245

I probably wouldn't bother having the "2018" guernsey because they only wore the Guernsey with the current ISC collar in one game against port, then back to the old template for the rest of the season.
View attachment 979246

I would include it, but just note that it was for one round (whatever round that may be) – similar to other short-term uses like the early polyester NM / St K jumpers

 

[Mero]

West Torrens SANFL Jumpers

www.footyjumpers.com

www.footyjumpers.com

Glenelg, Port Magpies, South Adelaide, West Adelaide & Woodville-West Torrens to go

 

[The Victorian]

On Port Magpies, from 2013-2017 they wore black cuffs and collar
2013-2016


2017



2018

2019

 

[Mero]

On Port Magpies, from 2013-2017 they wore black cuffs and collar
2013-2016
View attachment 980155

2017

View attachment 980156

2018
View attachment 980157
2019
View attachment 980158

Port wore the lace-up in 1997, then at some stage moved to sublimated jumpers with the laces on them, then these ones.
I am looking for those years when they wore the different variations

 

[Fizzler]

I’m noticing, as Dylan8 has pointed out, that Port has been inconsistent with the logo as some merchandise items have the Port logo without the 1870 and some do. This inconsistency has carried over to our jumpers too. On your site Mero you have all the jumpers with the 1870 in the logo, but I’m seeing conflicting images with and without the 1870.
Charlie Dixon in round 4, no 1870

Charlie Dixon in around 14 vs Sydney, hard to tell but it looks like there is an 1870, albeit very thin, a photo of Darcy Byrne-Jones from the same game also has the 1870

The clash jumper, from what I can tell doesn’t have the 1870 for anyone at any time, this photo of Robbie Gray in Round 7 has no monogram and I haven’t seen any photos of anyone that conflict this.

The Indigenous jumper appears to have the 1870 in these photos of Charlie Dixon and Karl Amon, as does this promo image of Amon, Amon’s looks much thinner than Dixon’s



The preseason jumper also appears to not have an 1870 on it but Google images on my iPad is making every image look extremely compressed so I can’t actually tell if there is an 1870 on this, it appears not, but if someone would like to trawl the web to see for sure then be my guest.

Finally, the Prison Bars from Round 2. The same goes with google images for the preseason jumper so yeah, if you want to look into it then go for it

So I can’t tell if it’s a round by round thing or if it’s a player thing but if anyone wants to do some more digging then by all means go for it.
Also the Port 2019 clash had silver trimming, not black

 

[Mero]

Fizzler Fixed the Collar & Cuffs
Not quite sure what to do with the 1870.
If it wasn't there on all of them I'll take it out.
But my understanding was that it was there on at least most.

 

[Fizzler]

Fizzler Fixed the Collar & Cuffs
Not quite sure what to do with the 1870.
If it wasn't there on all of them I'll take it out.
But my understanding was that it was there on at least most.

Sweet, I’ll try and have a proper look on AFL photos when I get the chance to see what the go is and if it’s a round thing, for example the team wore a different set of home jumpers in round one (GFG on front and back with horizontal MG logo heat pressed on the front) compared to fully sublimated logos from Round 3 onwards so it may be that, but I’ll let you know.

 

[Cody_]

Thats a pretty good pickup, never noticed the absence of the 1870.

 

[TheGreatBambino]

Hi mate, I’ve noticed North Melbourne's 2003/04 away/clash jumper had more bold traditional numbers

 

[Mero]

Hi mate, I’ve noticed North Melbourne's 2003/04 away/clash jumper had more bold traditional numbers

View attachment 980573
View attachment 980575
View attachment 980576

Thanks, fixed.

 

[SJ]

Just noticed the middle white stripe on the Collingwood jumper is noticeably thicker than the outside stripes this year. On the website it seems you’ve got them equal widths.

 

[Mero]

Just noticed the middle white stripe on the Collingwood jumper is noticeably thicker than the outside stripes this year. On the website it seems you’ve got them equal widths.

I do have the stripes equal widths.
I think I will have to wait until game worn jumpers appear on Instagram, which could be as early as next week, to be honest.

 

[SJ]

I do have the stripes equal widths.
I think I will have to wait until game worn jumpers appear on Instagram, which could be as early as next week, to be honest.

Club shop image shows the difference too: https://shop.collingwoodfc.com.au/collingwood-2020-isc-mens-home-guernsey/

 

[Gibbsy]

Club shop image shows the difference too: https://shop.collingwoodfc.com.au/collingwood-2020-isc-mens-home-guernsey/

I reckon that might just be perspective, but happy to be proven wrong. They look very similar in width at the top of the stripe, for instance. A flattened-out PI would be the best for determining the proper widths.

 

[SJ]

I reckon that might just be perspective, but happy to be proven wrong. They look very similar in width at the top of the stripe, for instance. A flattened-out PI would be the best for determining the proper widths.

I couldn’t stop seeing it last night.

 

[SJ]

I couldn’t stop seeing it last night.

Also if it was perspective, wouldn’t the right hand stripe be wider than the middle in this view?

 

[BlackWing]

Hi Mero

I hate to be pedantic but on the title page the name of the club is shown as Central Districts on the coloured square and the big white title part.
The correct name is Central District, no s on the end. It is correct on the inside page with the jumpers.

Thanks

 

[TheLoungeLizard]

Hi Mero

I hate to be pedantic but on the title page the name of the club is shown as Central Districts on the coloured square and the big white title part.
The correct name is Central District, no s on the end. It is correct on the inside page with the jumpers.

Thanks

Being pedantic is why we post on this board

Welcome

 

[The Half Back]

Being pedantic is why we post on this board

Welcome

I knew there was a reason this thread had 300+ pages.

 

[Mero]

Hi Mero

I hate to be pedantic but on the title page the name of the club is shown as Central Districts on the coloured square and the big white title part.
The correct name is Central District, no s on the end. It is correct on the inside page with the jumpers.

Thanks

Fixed, thanks

 

[TheLoungeLizard]

Mero Whats been the biggest change to jumpers in your time? For better or worse

 

[Mero]

Mero Whats been the biggest change to jumpers in your time? For better or worse

Sublimated (printed) designs
IMO that's made it worse because what I consider traditional designs that could be drawn by a kid were replaced by gradient filled nonsense.
Consider the ugliest jumpers of all time.
I guarantee every one you've thought of was from from after 1996.
Like this

 

[mfcrox]

If you can draw it in Microsoft Paint with no more than 3-4 colours = Good design

 

[Nickimus Rex]

Sublimated (printed) designs
IMO that's made it worse because what I consider traditional designs that could be drawn by a kid were replaced by gradient filled nonsense.
Consider the ugliest jumpers of all time.
I guarantee every one you've thought of was from from after 1996.
Like this

Behold the glory! xD