Resource www.footyjumpers.com

Remove this Banner Ad

Sublimated (printed) designs
IMO that's made it worse because what I consider traditional designs that could be drawn by a kid were replaced by gradient filled nonsense.
Consider the ugliest jumpers of all time.
I guarantee every one you've thought of was from from after
Like this
Regretting doing SANFL yet? 😄
 
Sublimated (printed) designs
IMO that's made it worse because what I consider traditional designs that could be drawn by a kid were replaced by gradient filled nonsense.
Consider the ugliest jumpers of all time.
I guarantee every one you've thought of was from from after 1996.
Like this

kid at the store: mom, can we have The Ochre?

mom: no sweetie we have The Ochre at home.

The Ochre at home:

071F9B18-292F-45FE-8A47-1B9D4160A3C7.gif
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Hello,
I bring you a revelation.

Geelong had black numbers in the 1989 Grand Final (pictured) and also in the 1992 Grand Final, as I can see from Fox Footy right now but no still images I can find 🙁
...Which makes me wonder how long prior they had black numbers for and we never noticed?
images (61).jpeg

EDIT: 1994 GF they definitely accentuated the blue numbers
images (62).jpeg
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Reebok used quite a dark shade of navy for the Crows home in 2012 compared to other years (probably the darkest its ever been for a Crows jumper), so I'd suggest making the navy a lot darker on the illustrations for the 2012 Crows home. It was quite a big change from 2011, and it got lighter again in 2013 (but not as light as 2011).
2011
241785.jpg

2012
269314.jpg

2013
300972.jpg
 
If you judge by Hawkins' logo placement, it should also be in the armpit! :laughing:

View attachment 994271
View attachment 994273
Sponsorship placement on the cats guernseys depend on the jumper size. The bigger the jumper, the more spaced out the logos are. For example, the smaller mids like Ablett and Selwood have normal placed logos but for Hawkins, Stanleys ect, their logos are almost under the armpits
 
Reebok used quite a dark shade of navy for the Crows home in 2012 compared to other years (probably the darkest its ever been for a Crows jumper), so I'd suggest making the navy a lot darker on the illustrations for the 2012 Crows home. It was quite a big change from 2011, and it got lighter again in 2013 (but not as light as 2011).
2011
241785.jpg

2012
269314.jpg

2013
300972.jpg
No quite sure what to do with this.
Every pic I see is impacted by the prevailing light conditions.
The jumpers look darker in Night games, lighter in Day games.
1603585855574.png 1603585864438.png
 
No quite sure what to do with this.
Every pic I see is impacted by the prevailing light conditions.
The jumpers look darker in Night games, lighter in Day games.
View attachment 994582View attachment 994583

I think some other Crows jumper brainiacs could back me up on this, was definitely darker in 2012.
Heres better pictures, of actual guernseys themselves on the same bed:
2011
117121724_2639982396255691_419885247861677383_o.jpg
116876647_2639982349589029_2695449886151644328_o.jpg


2012
83435714_2482778028642796_7371899557824692224_o.jpg
84691865_2482777981976134_4577267580741353472_o.jpg


You can clearly see its a deeper navy for 2012, deeper than it usually is for the Crows. For some reason Reebok had the colour too light in 2010/2011 but then made it too dark in 2012 (they just couldn't get it right), but then Puma got the colour back to normal for 2013 like it was before Reebok.
 
When the
I think some other Crows jumper brainiacs could back me up on this, was definitely darker in 2012.
Heres better pictures, of actual guernseys themselves on the same bed:
2011
117121724_2639982396255691_419885247861677383_o.jpg
116876647_2639982349589029_2695449886151644328_o.jpg


2012
83435714_2482778028642796_7371899557824692224_o.jpg
84691865_2482777981976134_4577267580741353472_o.jpg


You can clearly see its a deeper navy for 2012, deeper than it usually is for the Crows. For some reason Reebok had the colour too light in 2010/2011 but then made it too dark in 2012 (they just couldn't get it right), but then Puma got the colour back to normal for 2013 like it was before Reebok.
When the Crows came into the competition in 1991 they played on television at night, I thought their colours black yellow and red. And it wasn’t just me.
 
Speaking of the Scrap page, there's a few recent Geelong jumpers to add Mero:

2018 clash:
Geelong Cats 2018 Men's Clash Guernsey / 9800321's Clash Guernsey / 9800321
9800321_Geelong-Cats-2018-Mens-Clash-Guernsey_2__112113170.jpg


2019 clash:

Geelong Cats 2019 Men's Clash Guernsey / 9800629's Clash Guernsey / 9800629
Geelong Cats 2019 Men's Clash Guernsey / 9800629's Clash Guernsey / 9800629



2020 clash:

Geelong Cats 2020 Men's Clash Guernsey / 9801046's Clash Guernsey / 9801046
Geelong Cats 2020 Men's Clash Guernsey / 9801046's Clash Guernsey / 9801046

And from a few years back, we had away jumpers made up on the 2006-07 Slazenger template but retired the away jumper after 2005 (along with the 2003-05 Slazenger template)

Inside the 'secret meeting' that saw Hawthorn miss out on drafting Joel  Selwood in 2006 | Fox Sports
 
Hello,
I bring you a revelation.

Geelong had black numbers in the 1989 Grand Final (pictured) and also in the 1992 Grand Final, as I can see from Fox Footy right now but no still images I can find 🙁
...Which makes me wonder how long prior they had black numbers for and we never noticed?
View attachment 993200

EDIT: 1994 GF they definitely accentuated the blue numbers
View attachment 993202
Looks as though Geelong was wearing black numbers from maybe the 1970s to the early 1990s.

And perhaps earlier in the 1900s too.

Last year Bob Gartland displayed his GFC collection to commemorate the club's 160th anniversary. A number of guernseys were on display:

1604018623695.png

1604018841949.png

From this photo, my own photos and this video tour I can see quite a few with black numbers:
- #14 David Clarke 1970s lace up
- #32 Garry Hocking appears late 1990s/early 2000s (possibly last game)
- #13 very old early 1900s guernsey
- #40 appears Ian Nankervis' guernsey (1970s?)
- #9 woolen long sleeve guernsey (1980s?)

 
From what I can gather from these pics and others I've researched the most likely introduction of Black numbers would be with the foam backed numbers that were sewn onto acrylic jumpers.
Therefore I've amended the images to include Black numbers on jumpers that didn't use the Cloth number panel which was sewn onto the back of the jumper.

(images may be cached if you've been on the page recently, so open the image in a new tab and press F5 to refresh the image.)
 
From what I can gather from these pics and others I've researched the most likely introduction of Black numbers would be with the foam backed numbers that were sewn onto acrylic jumpers.
Therefore I've amended the images to include Black numbers on jumpers that didn't use the Cloth number panel which was sewn onto the back of the jumper.

(images may be cached if you've been on the page recently, so open the image in a new tab and press F5 to refresh the image.)
I think you’re right. But it also appears Geelong was wearing these in the late 1990s/early 2000s after wearing navy numbers from 1994-.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Resource www.footyjumpers.com

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top