My final prediction:
22 - T.McCartin
24 - B.Daniels
35 - J.Houlahan
58 - O.Clavarino
72 - E.Floyd
22 - T.McCartin
24 - B.Daniels
35 - J.Houlahan
58 - O.Clavarino
72 - E.Floyd
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Prob (Pure_Ownage ) he was keen on Kelly and I think MiersWho won this btw???
Ling at 58 would be noice but I think he prob goes 40-50 ish.
Slipped to us very nicely, lol. Good ol' Miers at Pick 57, lol.That will make him slip a lot I suspect... Recruiters will not like that at all.
if we go for an inside mid I hope it’s for Constable.
He wasn't far off in the end mate.Doubt Higgins will even get close to 22...
And a good pickup for Richmond, in the end. Lets them work on replacing one of their mediocre players with a better prospect while retaining the focus on small forwards.He wasn't far off in the end mate.
Isn't he a cat B rookie?Tony Olango being considered in the Rookie Draft.
I don't think the Hawks actually committed to him, pretty sure they only took Chankuoth Jiath through next-gen pathways.Isn't he a cat B rookie?
Two geographically distant sides in the mix for NT youngster http://m.afl.com.au/news/2017-11-27/opposites-attract-for-sudanborn-ruck-talentIsn't he a cat B rookie?
He doesn't excite me a great deal. I'd rather commit that pick to Crameri.Two geographically distant sides in the mix for NT youngster http://m.afl.com.au/news/2017-11-27/opposites-attract-for-sudanborn-ruck-talent
I’d rather him and Crameri and appologize to waybill.He doesn't excite me a great deal. I'd rather commit that pick to Crameri.
I'd go Krueger/Collins and Crameri if I had my way.I’d rather him and Crameri and appologize to waybill.
My understanding is Cat B rookies are just signed, you don’t draft them.I took from the afl article that Olanga can be drafted onto cat b rookie list as part of the new acadamey pathways. Have i interpreted that wrong?