In an era of growing scrutiny and public demand for accountability, investigative journalism plays an indispensable role in society. This is particularly the case with Russell Jackson, an ABC journalist who has recently found himself at the epicenter of a storm surrounding the Hawthorn Football Club allegations. Amidst the whirlwind of claims and counterclaims, the ABC has remained steadfast in its support for Jackson, defending his integrity and the meticulous nature of his reporting.
“From the start there has been a concerted attempt to undermine ABC journalist Russell Jackson’s reporting on the Hawthorn FC allegations made by some First Nations former players and their family members,” the ABC statement begins. This attempt to discredit Jackson and his work underscores the contentious nature of the subject matter he was investigating. It’s an all-too-familiar scenario for journalists on the frontline of truth-seeking missions, where their findings may not always sit comfortably with all parties involved.
An important aspect of Jackson’s methodology, which has come under fire, involves the fair and timely contact of all parties involved in the allegations. “Across two days before publication of the original story the three individuals were contacted multiple times by the ABC, via email, phone call and text message,” the ABC statement elaborates. “They were provided with all relevant information about the allegations. They were asked detailed and open-ended questions that gave them the opportunity to fully respond to all allegations.”
This level of diligence is indicative of the thoroughness with which Jackson approached this sensitive issue. Far from excluding voices, Jackson made concerted efforts to engage all stakeholders, offering them the chance to provide their side of the story. However, despite repeated contact and the provision of additional time for responses, the ABC received no reply.
At the heart of the ABC’s defense of Jackson is an unwavering belief in his professionalism, integrity, and the public value of his work. Justin Stevens, ABC Director, News, has been unequivocal in his support, stating: “Russell Jackson’s reporting was thorough and fair. It was in the public’s interest to be informed about these issues and Russell went to great lengths to get the other side of the story so he could report on that as well. Russell Jackson is a highly experienced and ethical, Walkley Award-winning journalist. The ABC stands behind him and his work.”
Stevens’ endorsement is a potent reminder of the importance of investigative journalism in a democratic society. It’s a testament to the courage and tenacity of journalists like Jackson, who, despite facing criticism and opposition, remain committed to their work, upholding the highest standards of journalistic integrity.
In the face of adversity, Jackson’s story is a testament to the importance of standing by truth and integrity. His commitment to thorough and fair reporting, even in the face of harsh criticism, is an example for all journalists navigating the complex and often contentious world of investigative journalism.
