- Oct 14, 2016
- 2,601
- 3,221
- AFL Club
- Sydney
I find the bid matching system linked to a round rather than within x picks baffling. So and need pick 18 minimum to match both pick 1 (plus other picks) and pick 17 (with a pick coming back). It's just silly. Why not say instead you need a pick within 15 picks of your academy/father son to match. Seems like a much easier solution.
I think 15 picks back is about the right number, that way if a team played in the grand final that year then they need to trade up to get a pick one player.
I think both ideas are flawed for the same reasons
You could effectively get stone walled out of the opportunity to match by other clubs. Plus, the premium to get up the board probably outweighs the current discount for accepting the bid. It just opens up too many bidding angles and although it might be clearer for fans, it doesn't make things clearer - in practice.
If those options go through the academies could, at certain talent brackets depending on ladder finish become totally neutered. As ugly as it is at times, the points system is a cleaner way to deal with bidding.
Anyway, I'm still of the opinion that NGA's and compensation picks should be scrapped, discounts dropped to 5 or 10% for academies and no discount should exist for father sons