No team ??Thiisssssssssssssssss
McLaren want to win full stop and they aren't stupid enough to blindly give preferential treatment to a driver just because.
No team is.
Dont think thats quite right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Carlton - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Blues at 76% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
LIVE: Richmond v Carlton - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Blues at 76% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
No team ??Thiisssssssssssssssss
McLaren want to win full stop and they aren't stupid enough to blindly give preferential treatment to a driver just because.
No team is.
Hard to out qualify your teammate when your teammate has car upgrades that Piastri hasn't recevied...Rather than crying about McLaren favouring Lando, perhaps Oscar should try and fix the horrific qualifying record he had last year against Lando. Starting on the back foot is a far bigger issue than any perceived favouritism from the team.
That doesn't justify the 20-4 qualifying discrepancy in 2024.Hard to out qualify your teammate when your teammate has car upgrades that Piastri hasn't recevied...
Yeah ok, clearly pointless talking about this with you.Hard to out qualify your teammate when your teammate has car upgrades that Piastri hasn't recevied...
why does zak keep calling oscar lando then?Agreed.
McLaren have always been one of the most fair teams when it comes to teammates, until it comes to a point where one is clearly ahead. From the Ron era into the current Brown/Stella era. The only year they really ballsed it up was 2007. And boy did they balls that up.
Considering Oscar just signed a multi year extension overnight, they clearly value both drivers equally.
They'll have that usual papaya rules stuff early doors but we won't see any eggs in one basket until at least the summer break IMO
Yeah, wasn't it something like 20-4?Rather than crying about McLaren favouring Lando, perhaps Oscar should try and fix the horrific qualifying record he had last year against Lando. Starting on the back foot is a far bigger issue than any perceived favouritism from the team.
If my Aunty had balls and all that....That doesn't justify the 20-4 qualifying discrepancy in 2024.
Have to assume OP is getting paid.Well this is an interesting turn of events….though he might have held out a bit longer to see how the 26 regs played out or if Max’s seat at RBR opened up
![]()
McLaren Formula 1 Team announce multi-year contract extension with Oscar Piastri
"I'm very proud to be continuing to represent this legendary team for many years to come"www.mclaren.com
Both sides would have a get out clause as well.Have to assume OP is getting paid.
I definitely have more faith in him leading after the first corner from pole.I have more faith in Oscar holding a lap 1 lead than what I do Lando.
Well, no. He almost had it taken away by preferential treatment.OP81 essentially got his 1st F1 win via preferential treatment so not sure what the argument is here..
Nope.OP81 essentially got his 1st F1 win via preferential treatment so not sure what the argument is here..
C'mon mate I'm sure you don't genuinely believe thisIf my Aunty had balls and all that....
This is just feel - so bias in play. Oscar lost pole position through track limits a few times - I felt he was matching Norris more often it was a fraction off. I also remember Oscar bottling last lap runs in Q3 where his warm-up (and the teams track management) wasn't as good as it could (should) be - either hitting traffic; going off-line to overtake or backing off WAY too much. Finally, (I feel this was the most common) it was S3 of Q3 where Lando got the advantage - Oscar had burnt the tires earlier in the lap - Oscar going P/P/Y, whilst Lando goes G/G/P for the pole.
Oscar also always seemed to finish his Q3 laps early - Lando would be last 2-3 cars across the line, sometimes Oscar was over a minute ahead, watching his slot drop from P1 to midfield over that last minute. Maybe this was driver preference, maybe this was the team favouring Lando?
I'm hoping for a truly fair fight in 2025. I'm expecting Lando to continue to get these small advantages - which will add up over the course of a season - unless Oscar is somehow able to prove he is unequivocally a better driver.
Lando is quicker but I think Oscar is a more complete package. If he can gain a tenth or so it will put papaya rules under the pump.Oscar has a higher ceiling than Lando IMO but right now, Lando is the better overall driver.
Oscar needs to improve his pace.Lando is quicker but I think Oscar is a more complete package. If he can gain a tenth or so it will put papaya rules under the pump.
'More complete package' LolLando is quicker but I think Oscar is a more complete package. If he can gain a tenth or so it will put papaya rules under the pump.
Enlighten us oh wise one.....'More complete package' Lol
Don’t disagree with any of this.I wrote pages last year about the pit strategies and radio messages.
I started from the position the calls all went one way, but IMO a LOT of it came down to language and communication. Norris was told the preferential strategy and then asked what he wanted (who are we racing). Piastri was only ever really asked if he could keep going (do you think you can stay with or keep in front of X).
Same scenario, similar question - but the inference and driver responses were completely different. Lando backed himself to overtake, so always wanted to be fastest car on track (even if behind); where Oscar was a lot more ambivalent, seeming to want his engineers to make the right call. If an earlier pit was thought faster, Oscar was regularly encouraged (by way of phrasing) to stay out longer.
- If Norris is ahead - Lando was asked first on pitting, then Piastri was told the team strategy.
- If Piastri is ahead - Oscar was asked first if he could stay out, then they asked Norris, then Piastri was told the strategy. It was only when Oscar complained he couldn't stay out he was pitted first.
Stuck in dirty air behind an opponent:
Same scenario, different instructions. Oscar burns his tires as he stays as close as he can - perhaps knowing he won't get the advantageous pit call? Or he just saw track position more advantageous than a pace advantage.
- Norris - you're faster than them, so back off, save tires and we'll find you a gap to undercut.
- Piastri - you're faster than them, so stay close and keep the pressure on (burns up both their tires) - we'll pit later when we need tires.
Racing each other on track - told to stop pushing and conserve tires/brakes/fuel:
- Piastri - drops 0.5-0.6 in the next section, then starts building slowly until told specific corners.
- Norris - green sectors, continues to close the gap whilst his pit yell at him to back off every corner.
- Finally backs off <2 seconds behind, complains Oscar should be faster and is holding him up.
Norris' pitstops are far more strategic - Piastri tends to be performance limited. It could simply be a case of Norris can predict the car/tire management better - the team are more prepared to punt on him doing long final stints - whereas Oscar is about making sure they have a tire offset/buffer at the end. Oscar's still avoiding the cliff.
Norris also seems to be far better in traffic, and overtaking for position with smaller pace advantages - Oscar still gets caught behind slower cars for long stretches (but is getting better/more aggressive).
So temperament, self-confidence, maturity, composure, communication, situational awareness, and general intelligence aren't important for an F1 driver?'More complete package' Lol