Opinion Has this Carlton list already peaked?

Has this Carlton list already peaked?

  • Yes

    Votes: 229 76.8%
  • No

    Votes: 69 23.2%

  • Total voters
    298
The Blues are closer to the bottom of the ladder than the top.

Forget the 30 year anniversary, we will all be talking about their 50 year anniversary.
 
If you are talking about McStay, he is on $650k. I don’t see many free agents going anywhere near that low.

Also, if he wasn’t for him, we wouldn’t have played in the 2023 GF and subsequently be premiers.
A true Finals footballer.

Curnow on almost double, yet a massive failure under finals pressure.

But that’s Carlton isn’t it….
Charlies on about 850-9 each year so not that far off for the far better player.
 
Doubt he is on $850k. Even if he is, he is overrated given he melts during finals footy.

But just making finals may be good enough for Carlton FC.
Took considerable unders after spending years on the sidelines collecting $ in the rehab group on an already generous contract at the time. Said as much himself when he signed on long term.
 
Gerard Healy and Rodney Eade discussing Carlton's list:

Healy - 'We all know they've got a great top 6, but who are their next 6, and how do they compare to those of other teams?'

Eade - 'I'd go as far as saying their bottom 10 are as bad as any other team in the comp.'

Now, where have I heard that assessment before?
 
Gerard Healy and Rodney Eade discussing Carlton's list:

Healy - 'We all know they've got a great top 6, but who are their next 6, and how do they compare to those of other teams?'

Eade - 'I'd go as far as saying their bottom 10 are as bad as any other team in the comp.'

Now, where have I heard that assessment before?
Probably in ur deluded fantasies
 
You've been saying we have no depth for 3 years but last off season u told us we traded out all our depth which will lead to disaster... Depth who apparently never existed in the first place...

Ur a troll
So I'm 'trolling' by saying what I've been saying for three years, which is now the same thing people in the media who get paid to analyse football have now realised and are now saying?
 
So I'm 'trolling' by saying what I've been saying for three years, which is now the same thing people in the media who get paid to analyse football have now realised and are now saying?
How did we trade out all our depth if uve been claiming it never existed in the first place Fadge?

Its a very simple question
 
You've been saying we have no depth for 3 years but last off season u told us we traded out all our depth which will lead to disaster... Depth who apparently never existed in the first place...

Ur a troll
Despite having poor depth, a club can still trade out those poor depth players to make their list even worse.
 
So I'm 'trolling' by saying what I've been saying for three years, which is now the same thing people in the media who get paid to analyse football have now realised and are now saying?
Oh they get paid? Their opinion must be treated as fact then. Especially when they provide so much detail explaining their view. Oh hang on a second I'm being passed a note...
 
Yeah, OK.

So let's just continue to ignore anyone who says anything negative about the Carlton Football Club.
Don't put words in my mouth. If you are going to make a statement back it up. I read the article posted by SEN and Eade just stated it with no reasoning behind it whatsoever.

He didn't even name who our bottom 10 was. How do you make a statement like that without actually comparing the bottom 10 players on each list?

It would be like me saying Patrick Cripps is the best player in the competition and then not being able to explain why I think he is better than Marcus Bontempelli. It's not meaningful analysis.
 
Don't put words in my mouth. If you are going to make a statement back it up. I read the article posted by SEN and Eade just stated it with no reasoning behind it whatsoever. He didn't even name who our bottom 10 was.

How do you make a statement like that without actually comparing the bottom 10 players on each list?

It would be like me saying Patrick Cripps is the best player in the competition and then not being able to explain why I think he is better than Marcus Bontempelli. It's not proper analysis.
They clearly didn't have time to go into the detail as they had more important things on their agenda.

Nonetheless, what I've been saying for 3 years is now being said by those who get paid to watch and assess the game.
 
They clearly didn't have time to go into the detail as they had more important things on their agenda.
Well if they don't have time to explain a viewpoint or provide any sort of evidence to support it then it's not very meaningful. Does provide a nice clickbait headline though.
 
Yeah, OK.

So let's just continue to ignore anyone who says anything negative about the Carlton Football Club.
Not ignore anyone who says anything negative. Just anything you have to say give you spend all your time on here trolling Carlton.

There's plenty of fair criticism of Carlton out there, but when it's coming from a bloke who's claimed Mason Cox is better than Sam Walsh and Fin Macrae & Ned Long are better than Matthew Kennedy and Matthew Owies there's really no point in taking your opinion for anything but partisan jargon.
 
The Blues are extremely reliant on Cripps.

Never in the history of footy has one team been so reliant on one player.

If Cripps plays an absolute blinder, Carlton can win any game at any time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Opinion Has this Carlton list already peaked?

Back
Top