Review Rd 1 Review - !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? (Freo Beat Adelaide by a Point - Praise be to ChapGod)

Remove this Banner Ad

That first one to Rowe I still call bullshit on. He dropped the knees and lifted his arm IIRC. There is also another one where the Adelaide player drove his head into one of our players legs and got the high contact free which is incorrect yet says Brodie doing the same thing was incorrectly called high contact.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That first one to Rowe I still call bullshit on. He dropped the knees and lifted his arm IIRC. There is also another one where the Adelaide player drove his head into one of our players legs and got the high contact free which is incorrect yet says Brodie doing the same thing was incorrectly called high contact.
Yep. I hate that action. That and driving themselves forward in the tackle for an in the back.

Cant expect the umpire to adjudicate it though, they have enough to worry about.

I’d prefer if each game was reviewed, and players were quietly fined $1k every time they did it.

Happens in the AFLW a lot too, which is extremely dangerous. Though the penalty would have to be less.
 
Anyone willing to recount the free kick tally based on this? Feels like it'll skew even more in favour of Adelaide
There were a few though, where Adelaide received a correct free kick, almost immediately after a non-call against us, which wouldn’t have happened.

We get one or two of those calls go the right way in third, we can then slow things down and take some control.
 
Re the umpiring - looking back on it - I can't remember massive howlers, but I just remember every single 50/50 call going to Adelaide; and the opposite happening to us. This normally swings back and forth throughout the game so the free-kick tally evens out. Yesterday it was consistent to Adelaide, hence the lopsided free-kick count against (even though we dominated 2.5 quarters of the match).

For example the 'play-on' calls to Shultz when he was lining up for goal in the 2nd quarter, and Brayshaw in the fourth are technically there; but it wasn't consistent with Adelaide. Fogerty lined up 5 mins before Shultz's set-shot and had a big arch but it wasn't called play on. Minor stuff but it adds up.
 
I can't believe the Adelaide player just grabbing Chapman and pushing him front on in a contest without eyes on the ball is given the all clear because Chapman was holding him too.

At least the other two howlers by Eleni were confirmed howlers.
 
Why didn’t Colyer get a run as the “medical sub” ?.

Someone like Henry or Walters, could have been diagnosed with “soreness” in the hammies.

Colyer would have added some spark, around the jaded bodies.
Could have subbed Brodie off for not having any lungs.

(I like what he brings, but he did run out of puff. Really think the plan is to have the three of Fyfe, Mundy and Brodie play 60% each, only two on the field at a time)
 
Why didn’t Colyer get a run as the “medical sub” ?.

Someone like Henry or Walters, could have been diagnosed with “soreness” in the hammies.

Colyer would have added some spark, around the jaded bodies.

If it was a final - absolutely, but it's round one. We technically can't do that. You can probably only get away with it once - maybe twice during the season. We won the match regardless so we made the right call.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Freddy with the nom.

(A few different versions of the commentary, that aren’t Underwood’s shambles)



Still shit commentary. It needed Huddo to do it justice.
 
I thought it was an independent doctor on the boundary that has to assess any injury for the injury sub to be activated to stop teams exploiting it. Or am I confused and that is not the case?
Not sure.
I thought the independent medico was for the review afterwards, and the club copped a fine if they were playing games.

I thought the subbed player automatically had to miss next week, but I too could be confused.
Pretty sure that’s only for concussion.

But again, rule was brought in in a hurry, and I’m not sure if the minutiae has ever been released.
Taylor do you have any further info?
 
Interesting read with that umpiring call commentary.

I think my blood pressure is only just starting to come down.

******* disgraceful.

Least we got the win.
Has there been any official commentary or just the whinge from Dockers BF ?
 
Mitch is a better kick than Mick is now and execute 50 metre plus.
Mitch stands up in the tackle and doesn’t go to ground as much so is able to make the 2nd effort.
Mitch is clearly faster.

I can’t think of anything that Mick is significantly better at than Mitch Crowden.
Is that you joao? Lol
 
Has there been any official commentary or just the whinge from Dockers BF ?
Everyone will move on because we got the win. I don't know if there is anything official. I highly doubt it - or it's behind closed doors the club speaks to the umpires boss.

Doesn't change the fact it was a disgrace.

Bring on the Saints.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Review Rd 1 Review - !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? (Freo Beat Adelaide by a Point - Praise be to ChapGod)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top