Review Rd 1 Review - !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? (Freo Beat Adelaide by a Point - Praise be to ChapGod)

Remove this Banner Ad

I don't think this has been posted...

A Six-Pack Of IPA (Interesting Points, Allegedly): Jordan Clark’s new Freo mark, Lachie Schultz the barometer

renderTimingPixel.png

Jordan spark

What’s a great way to make a first impression? Cover more ground with the footy than anyone’s done before on club debut. That was the case with Jordan Clark against Adelaide, who made a huge impact off half-back and through the middle of the ground to rack up 716 metres gained. It was comfortably the most by a player wearing a Freo jumper for the first time since the stat was first recorded in 2008, surpassing Anthony Morabito’s encouraging debut against the same opponent in 2010. Underlining his impact from arc to arc, Clark finished with seven rebound-50s and six inside-50s – the only time in the Justin Longmuir era that a player has had a half-dozen of each stat.

MOST METRES GAINED IN DOCKERS DEBUT
Jordan Clark 716 (R1 2022)
Anthony Morabito 453 (R1 2010)
Nick Lower 448 (R1 2011)
Rhys Palmer 398 (R2 2008)
Ed Langdon 381 (R22 2015)

‘Dozen’ get the credit

Heath Chapman’s game-winning spoil rightly got the headlines, but don’t sleep on just how important Lachie Schultz has become to Fremantle’s forward half. The goalsneak’s major from beyond the 50m arc gave the Dockers the lead for good with three-and-a-half minutes remaining, and continued a trend of his scoring power having a direct correlation to team success. The three-goal effort marked the twelfth time Schultz has kicked multiple goals in a game – and Freo are a perfect 12 wins in those games. His win-loss record when he doesn’t? 7-26.

Point to prove

Before Sunday, it had been almost two decades since the Dockers had the chance to celebrate the narrowest of road escapes - a one-point win – in a visiting changeroom. Freo’s most recent one-point win away from WA was the ‘Sirengate’ affair in Launceston in 2006, but they didn’t get to sing the song straight after that one with the result only overturned from a draw later that week. Round 19 of 2003 marked the most recent time the Dockers celebrated a win by the barest of margins while travelling, with Troy Longmuir’s goal levelling the scores before a Des Headland set-shot behind with just seconds left sealed the deal.
 
While we're on the subject of free kicks etc, twice on Sunday Switta had a player in a tackle and the players arm was pinned so had no way of disposing of it (possible kick) but Switta took them to ground giving them an out and as a consequence both ended in a ball up. Would that be what he's taught? Why wouldn't he keep the player upright which to me would 9 out of 10 times result in htb?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We need to have a positive covid test ready to go, so if at half time someone is spudding it up, we pull the covid test out & get the sub in.
Covid seems to be important these days.🤪
 
While we're on the subject of free kicks etc, twice on Sunday Switta had a player in a tackle and the players arm was pinned so had no way of disposing of it (possible kick) but Switta took them to ground giving them an out and as a consequence both ended in a ball up. Would that be what he's taught? Why wouldn't he keep the player upright which to me would 9 out of 10 times result in htb?
Normally those would be called htb, it was horrendous umpiring more so then poor tackling technique.
 
This guy has been around for a while but its just some amateur on twitter. He cops as much flack about his interpretations as the umps do.
I think going through decision-by-decision is a flawed technique anyways. It pretty much has the sample being set by the very people under scrutiny, the umpires. As others have pointed out there are non-decisions that get missed and also more subtle interpretations (eg Brayshaw's minimal play-on call).

It's more about the trend and whether one side has it going more for them. Countless times watching it in replay my jaw dropped at the huge turnarounds in interpretation for the same call (eg HTB), often in less than a minute, for one side vs the other. A more comprehensive review would take into account whether there is a trend and the likelihood of close (or not so close) calls going more in favour of one side than the other.
 
Deliberate out of bounds is a free against. OOTF is not a free.
Why does it go on the players stats that kicks it out on the full? It also counts against a player in supercoach / dream team so I struggle to see how these stats are not applied to the game stats without individually counting up every free kick.

Does the person taking the free kick get given the possession?

I know kick ins use to not count as possessions but that has changed this year too.
 
This is easily my biggest gripe with the state of the game at the moment.

When a ball spills loose in the middle of a tackle being executed, how the actual fu** is the tackler meant to (1) know that the ball is no longer being held by the player they're tackling and (2) even if they do realise it has spilled, arrest their momentum so that the player isn't carried for that split-second too long for an umpire to get all excited?

I'm convinced that 99% of the time it's because the umpire couldn't see whether the player being tackled had the ball in the first place and so assumes they were taken out of the contest without touching the pill.

It's a blight on our game.
If it continues to get paid then a) the players will need to adjust their tackling techniques so they are more aware of where the ball is, or b) just wear the consequence of a percentage of tackles will go the other way.

I'm not sure you can bring in a rule to say possession is just about touching the ball and not the continuity/length.
 
Why does it go on the players stats that kicks it out on the full? It also counts against a player in supercoach / dream team so I struggle to see how these stats are not applied to the game stats without individually counting up every free kick.

Does the person taking the free kick get given the possession?

I know kick ins use to not count as possessions but that has changed this year too.
There is no free kick paid against or for when it’s kicked out on the full. There is however if it’s deemed deliberate. Yes the player who takes the out on the full gets awarded the possession and the person who kicks it out on the full gets awarded the kick. No free is paid either way.
 
Why does it go on the players stats that kicks it out on the full? It also counts against a player in supercoach / dream team so I struggle to see how these stats are not applied to the game stats without individually counting up every free kick.

Does the person taking the free kick get given the possession?

I know kick ins use to not count as possessions but that has changed this year too.
Further to the above, in SC it is a clanger kick so loses points, it is not a FA. Kicking OOTF is just +3 for the kicker (and +3/2 for the bringing it in)
 
Further to the above, in SC it is a clanger kick so loses points, it is not a FA. Kicking OOTF is just +3 for the kicker (and +3/2 for the bringing it in)
I get how it’s confusing, you would assume that an out of bounds on the full free kick would be recorded as a free kick. Just one of the quirks of the game that it isn’t I guess.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Really? I think that's cringe. It sounds like a schoolteacher giving out merit awards. You know every kid in the class is going to get one eventually.
If he said he was impressed by himself I'd take it seriously, he was clearly BOG (for us).
 
Brayshaw didn't write those reviews.

Freo media dept have taken his post match comments from ABC Adelaide audio where he was asked about the performances of several players and padded it out for site content.
 
Ffs that was my joke and I got less likes than yours.

Mine was too convoluted.
I think yours just got lost in the middle of the match thread. Was moving too fast and don’t think anyone had the emotional stability to think at the time.
 
At home with Covid and Just rewatched the game
We were incredibly lucky to pull that off
I don’t think I have ever seen an opposition team butcher so many turnovers and OOTF .

Our midfield was consistently good although knackered at the end
Switta is the difference
Logue best in defence but they were all decent
Schultzy is a soldier
Some real clangers by Acres and Meek in the last quarter but the fatigue must have been horrible.

Hard to see a top 8 team out there but there’s some positive signs and a long way to go .
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Review Rd 1 Review - !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? (Freo Beat Adelaide by a Point - Praise be to ChapGod)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top