Stats That Matter

Remove this Banner Ad

We are bottom ranked in efficiency inside 50. 3rd top in goal accuracy.

Basically we get it in a lot, and when we shoot we score goals more often, but also turn it over going in

On SM-A515F using BigFooty.com mobile app
I don’t think this is an accurate assessment yet as we just played a team that intercepted and forced turnover on our 68 inside 50s. In 1/3 of our games this will out balance our stats. In a few weeks once weve played port, GC freo and north itll
Be a better reflection of where we are at.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I think Saad is taking the piss a bit with how much he bounces the ball, then you realise he's a missed a game and look at the averages...
View attachment 1369088
View attachment 1369089
The rate he bounces and how soon he takes his first bounce may appear a bit silly, but my read is it's actually a smart move.

He gets a bounce or two in early, whenever he's got time and isn't under pressure, meaning his 'run distance' keeps resetting and if he has to really put the jets on to evade someone he's got an extra few metres to settle before disposing.
 
The rate he bounces and how soon he takes his first bounce may appear a bit silly, but my read is it's actually a smart move.

He gets a bounce or two in early, whenever he's got time and isn't under pressure, meaning his 'run distance' keeps resetting and if he has to really put the jets on to evade someone he's got an extra few metres to settle before disposing.
Good answer. I'll accept that.
 
been seeing a lot of commentary that all the good teams have strong scoring from turnover ... whereas we have relied on dominating clearances

is this lack of transition game a case of zagging when everyone else is zigging? will it work or will it limit us?
 
been seeing a lot of commentary that all the good teams have strong scoring from turnover ... whereas we have relied on dominating clearances

is this lack of transition game a case of zagging when everyone else is zigging? will it work or will it limit us?
I'll think we'll be zigging with the best of them soon enough. I suspect just a focus from Voss in implementing a tough contested and competitive brand for now, before we build in other areas.
 
been seeing a lot of commentary that all the good teams have strong scoring from turnover ... whereas we have relied on dominating clearances

is this lack of transition game a case of zagging when everyone else is zigging? will it work or will it limit us?

These so called "experts" on all the footy shows that spruik negative stats telling Clubs how they should be playing what they're doing wrong not very often they tell them what they're doing right.

The flavor of the week is scores from turnover.

To me if you are winning stoppages/clearances around the ground with your prime mids having 30+ touches having over 50 inside 50's and

lots of forward 50 tackles we have so much of the ball and dominance forward of centre that it becomes mute.

The anomaly for us in particular this weekend we had our greatest score from turnover against GC and lost the game.

It won't be long and the "experts" will be spruiking our game style when we are winning the majority of games with the Voss method,

he just has to come up with a way of overcoming the flooding of our fwd 50 which teams are using well against us at the moment.
 
The rate he bounces and how soon he takes his first bounce may appear a bit silly, but my read is it's actually a smart move.

He gets a bounce or two in early, whenever he's got time and isn't under pressure, meaning his 'run distance' keeps resetting and if he has to really put the jets on to evade someone he's got an extra few metres to settle before disposing.
I also think it's how he was taught to do it. His technique isn't quite the standard one, but it works for him because he's both faster and more agile; his bouncing has a different trajectory. He takes that many bounces because he did it when he learned, and he does it now for good or ill when he takes off.
 
In the 6 second half quarters in our last 3 wins (Dogs by 12, Hawks by 1, Port by 3) Carlton have kicked 8 goals.

Goalkickers:
Charlie 6
Jack Silvagni 2
 
In the 6 second half quarters in our last 3 wins (Dogs by 12, Hawks by 1, Port by 3) Carlton have kicked 8 goals.

Goalkickers:
Charlie 6
Jack Silvagni 2

Yeah, guess that's the end result, but would be interesting to see what the inside 50s are and marks for 2nd half of the game

Would give you an idea on how much run and control we have with the pill
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The rate he bounces and how soon he takes his first bounce may appear a bit silly, but my read is it's actually a smart move.

He gets a bounce or two in early, whenever he's got time and isn't under pressure, meaning his 'run distance' keeps resetting and if he has to really put the jets on to evade someone he's got an extra few metres to settle before disposing.
That was the problem with that swans guy last night. He took one bounce late then ran about 10 metres. He needed to take 3 bounced early like Saady
 
Has there ever been a club that has had two different Coleman medallists in consecutive seasons? Charlie a real chance after Harry got it last year.
No
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Stats That Matter

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top