Maybe not, but discarding players who go against your team's weakness feels uncomfortable to me. It's hard to keep a good list together.
I think how we play and how we select our team will be more instrumental to how we go next year than list management at this stage however list management could influence that enough.
As we have seen, the difference between top 4 and bottom 4 is bugger all. A few different players, different structure and some tweaks to the game plan.
Well our apparently outdated game plan did win us 2 finals, no matter how one wants to spin it, and within 3 goals of beating a side who hadn’t lost all year at home.
This whole running outside game thing, well the only finals which allowed that were both games against Port, who were crap in the contest. Also St Kilda v Giants, but I think that was more class difference showing.
Collingwood’s finals were basically the same as our ones, very tight low scoring affairs where there was no room to move.
Not saying we can’t add more pace, but saying the way we play is outdated is BS. It’s more personnel than anything, pies and Brisbane have a few more of the types we don’t.
Also if we managed to get a home final in the prelim we might be talking about us being in a GF.
I do agree we need to redress the balance a bit more between inside v outside, but it doesn’t need to be wide scale changes.