HoneyBadger35
They're not going to pick him, Mitch.
- Aug 11, 2011
- 28,483
- 80,791
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Moderator
- #1,669
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because he's nearly 8 years older and has baggage.
Why is Rioli < Geogiadis?
However he's top 10 on out list, and Georgiadis isn't even best 22... the baggage doesn't count if they're putting a 4yr contract in front of him. Rioli is in his prime years. Geogiadis might not even be an AFL best -22 AFL player.Because he's nearly 8 years older and has baggage.
Sorry mate, my bad.Come on man, I thought we were past fat shaming people these days.
Fitness is a different issue to talent - our whole bl00dy team was unfit all year!Come on mate, Georgiades played 19 games this year.
That's pretty much in their best side.
Willie might be in his prime years age wise, but to see he looked out of shape and not really interested.
Wait. They are valuing georgiades higher than Rioli? As in they want Rioli and pick 2 for him?The Port board seem unanimous in wanting pick 2 and something more involved in Georgiades, without anything going back the other way.
On what planet do they think he is worth that much? Maybe just pick 2 I can understand (even if I don't agree with it) but they appear adamant in ruling out dealing with their own pick 9 too. Not even the most incompetent recruiting staff would do say pick 2 and Rioli for Georgiades.
Don't hold back.Good outcome for WC. Old, fat, pot head with a pea for a brain - trade on.