The carry on after the post match stuff last night seems a little out of proportion.
Hinkley shouldn’t have got in the way of Breust’s send off (nor should Sicily in my view) and Sam Mitchell of all people has to consider his credibility about talking about antagonistic behaviour…
Ok, but why...
So I live in (/very near) Richmond and was in Geelong today. The one difference I noticed is that they’re still talking about footy in Geelong this week.
I think you're getting confused between not learning something and criticising it. I hope it was therapeutic for you to summarise the rule, but what I'm criticising is this (helpfully summarised): "'Whether he intended to hit him high or not doesn’t matter in the assessment of intentional". It...
Well, I did give you the credit of assuming you may have not known the circumstances before posting something so astonishingly stupid.
Lesson learned I guess.
Well, if you think it’s a voice of division you clearly are wrong. Using the word “woke” in that way just confirmed it.
How’s our perfect current state of unity working for you? Any other societal division you’re worried about or just the one with indigenous people involved?
Gotta live and die by the sword here. I agree all things being equal Dustin has a good case that he should have been AA this year.
Equally, he has a minimum 1 and arguably 2 Norm Smiths that should hang around other guys’ necks that he got because of the media wank factory.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.