Search results for query: *

Your name is Alex

You're 100% correct. Problem is that there isn't a Kornes or Rucci equivalent designated to hang shit on Geelong.

Always loved that lady. She's nice.

Silly posts guys. It wasn't that simple. We swapped Pick 31, 50 and 68 for Cheney, Lowden, 43, 47 and 59. Used 47 with 10 for 14 (Lever) and 35 (Wigg). Then we picked up McGovern with 43. So yes, I'd trade Pick 31 for Cheney and McGovern and use the steak-knives to get Lever.

Could be late to the party but has anyone worked out that this guy posts exactly like a supposed dead guy?

How do you know this mate... can't see info of it anywhere. I'm planning to go over and watch it in a pub or something if we can't get tickets but that'd be mint to be there after that!

Absolutely fair. PMd you mate

This is what my brother and I are doing..

Any chance I can take it off hands? I'll pay significantly...

Well done mate. How'd you find them? I'm devastated to have not been successful in the ballot. Long term Essential member misses out while Bronze memberships get through. Absolute rubbish! Anyone got ideas let me know. I'll pay what it takes.

Another fair comment. I'd play Seed instead of Cameron if anyone. One criticism my friends and I had watching yesterday is that Seed didn't run back enough.

Disagree above average - very average. Agree that he gets picked over Keath every day of the week and twice on Thursday nights.

It seriously concerns me that we have a coach/match committee who persist with GARBAGE that CC dishes up. If MacKay, Milera or Knight offered the same output they would have been dropped months ago. His numbers are actually frighteningly bad.

Sorry - love Lever, desperate to keep him - not good yesterday. He's rushing kicks, dropping marks he'd have swallowed Rounds 1-7ish and not dashing through players/traffic as he typically would.

Agree - that's not the question at all. I've been a massive critic of MacKay - lamented the day he ever came to our club. He's been serviceable of late... Cameron has not. And serviceable is not a subjective measure. It's a measure of whether they are useful to the team. Cameron is not at all...

And to think Impey was taken pick before him.... Hehehehehehehehehe

You just got pantsed, Ted.

No. Put Danger in our team last year and this year and we are probably about to go back-to-back. Another ridiculous thread.

WHAT? Just change it to red? Get sense. We aren't Port Power. Our gurnsey actually means something. You don't chop and change on a whim.

Mr Dylan, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no...

No. Dear isn't going to kick 60 goals!

Exactly right - 100%. This is what I said before. Mediocrity and sitting at 6-10 has cost us dearly - making us the only team alongside Richmond to have not played in a GF during the 2000s... We need to go all out or sell some players to start again and hasten the process.

No. It wouldn't. What an absurd comment. Again.

It comes down to this: Trade in someone who is a chance of improving our team during our small Premiership window or rebuild.

Absurd suggestion.

Really hope we get him but doubt they'd trade a top 5 player for picks. Kornes said he was their best player yesterday!

Love your work Flip. Spot on. There is rarely a trade that both sides would consider fair. It's the ultimate trade off between planning for the future with a draft pick that is a virtual unknown and getting a ready-made player for less than their current club thinks is fair.

Ignore them mate. I for one like the information on here from the likes of Redhorse et al. If some is wrong, so be it. Keep it coming if you get it. Thanks mate.

You have something conclusive. You've chosen to ignore it.