
Beerfish
Unscripted Hot Takes








- Jan 20, 2008
- 62,865
- 106,206
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Nic Martin
- Moderator
- #4,927
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 0
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
And Hawkins did kick 4 off the back of some pretty ordinary turnovers by us that left BZK exposed one on one.people will be quick to jump on Zerk but just noting Ridley had Hawkins for at least 2
Hawkins rag dolled him but Hawkins would have done the same to anyone in the comp given the amount of one on one chances he got with limited pressure on the ball coming in at times. Not BZK's one wood to be having a continual one on one wrestle with a monster.Didn't see the game, wasn't Zerk any good on a opponent?
I'm shocked.
I wonder how many 1v1s CD had him in, etc.
Hawkins rag dolled him but Hawkins would have done the same to anyone in the comp given the amount of one on one chances he got with limited pressure on the ball coming in at times. Not BZK's one wood to be having a continual one on one wrestle with a monster.
Shutting down tall forwards like Ben King?What is his one wood? A poor man's Jake Lever?
Watch some games without bias and you will work it out.What is his one wood? A poor man's Jake Lever?
Hawkins rag dolled him but Hawkins would have done the same to anyone in the comp given the amount of one on one chances he got with limited pressure on the ball coming in at times. Not BZK's one wood to be having a continual one on one wrestle with a monster.
Watch some games without bias and you will work it out.
So that Ridley could be rag dolled as well ? the reason Hawkins did not kick 12 was we managed to stop the supply line from around the 20 minute mark of the first quarter.The problem was that Zek-Thatcher should have been moved after Hawkins third goal - If BZT is being beaten on the lead with minimal pressure upfield then that's fine BUT once he was rag-dolled then the move had to be made.
Sorry. That was a bit of a low blow. I just think he has been okay so far this year and late last year. Has improved in my book.That's convenient.
For a long time, I thought the club stuffed up by trying to play Langford on the ball and Laverde up forward. I thought very strongly that Laverde had the make-up to be an explosive strong midfielder and that Langford was a forward. I was right about Langford, but Laverde is good as a backman, which is the last thing I would have predicted for him. He obviously has never built the tank to be mid.
If you're not being sarcastic, Laverde could potentially play as a defensive midfielder, but he would never be a ball-winner offensive forward.
Not being sarcastic.
He started life brash and largely able to do what he wanted.
But he got slowly ground down by injury and then having to play as an undersized key forward, never really having established himself.
I very much doubt that he would be the same version of the forward we saw play in 2019 and 2020. It's a vicious cycle when there is no confidence.
Feel like he’d be very good at getting someone pregnant if he put his mind to it.Time to start pumping out the kids Lav!