- Thread starter
- #226
He did it 3 times - just added to the list. Thanks.How was Didak in this category I imagine he would of been around the 20 a fair bit?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He did it 3 times - just added to the list. Thanks.How was Didak in this category I imagine he would of been around the 20 a fair bit?
I am a fan of Pendlebury's as well. It is just he has a couple of noticeable flat spots in his record. He doesn't have any scoreboard impact to speak of in finals. 75 score involvements from his last 18 finals since the stat has been recorded, and believe me, that average of 4.16 per final IS NOT ELITE. Of course that is to go with his 24 goals + assists in 31 finals overall, and that is dire. So his elite vision somehow does not seem to translate to scoreboard impact in the biggest games. And he is Collingwood's 3rd most successful of their last 3 captains. Just unlucky I guess.
Top group by what measure? And how do you delineate between your top group and the ones who fall just outside?
Forget goals and goals assists, what are Pendlebury's score involvements minus direct goals and points, say compared to Dusty over their careers
Knowing the answer that will give you a better indication of his effectiveness
Except he split his time between forward and midfield - so in reality should be compared to both. You're acting as if he was a stay at home forward pocket like Charlie Cameron.People use whatever measure is required to ensure a small/medium sized forward who amongst other small/medium forwards was second in coaches votes, second in Brownlow votes, second in Score involvements (5th in competition), came second in B&F and made AA squad’s season isn’t rated elite. Whatever measures ensure that’s the outcome is what is used.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
The fact you still can’t see my point astounds me not…Tbh I think people would rate 20 and 1 much higher if Dusty didn’t have 12. Lethal tops the list and H00t is still upset for some reason.
The fact you still can’t see my point astounds me not…
Lethal was the best if not in the top 3 for reasons very much unrelated to topping the list of seasons with 20 and 1.
Great players might have 20 and 1 seasons but they aren’t great because they had 20 and 1.
Leigh Matthews career averages.
22 disposals, not really elite
2.76 goals, not really elite
I guess he’s not really elite then according to you?
Or maybe like we are saying he’s Uber elite because he could do both. How many people have averaged that? None? Exactly.
I mean he’s whole deal is being known as a the guy who could win a Coleman and kick 900+ goals from the midfield.
Career averages?Leigh Matthews career averages.
22 disposals, not really elite
2.76 goals, not really elite
I guess he’s not really elite then according to you?
Or maybe like we are saying he’s Uber elite because he could do both. How many people have averaged that? None? Exactly.
I mean he’s whole deal is being known as a the guy who could win a Coleman and kick 900+ goals from the midfield.
Matthews had seasons like 77 when he was 3rd for average disposals and 3rd for average goals (2nd played only 9 games)Leigh Matthews career averages.
22 disposals, not really elite
2.76 goals, not really elite
I guess he’s not really elite then according to you?
Or maybe like we are saying he’s Uber elite because he could do both. How many people have averaged that? None? Exactly.
I mean he’s whole deal is being known as a the guy who could win a Coleman and kick 900+ goals from the midfield.
Any statistic that has three Carlton players in the top 6 for finals influence, including Marc Murphy, is not worth the internet space it is congesting.
I am a fan of Pendlebury's as well. It is just he has a couple of noticeable flat spots in his record. He doesn't have any scoreboard impact to speak of in finals. 75 score involvements from his last 18 finals since the stat has been recorded, and believe me, that average of 4.16 per final IS NOT ELITE. Of course that is to go with his 24 goals + assists in 31 finals overall, and that is dire. So his elite vision somehow does not seem to translate to scoreboard impact in the biggest games. And he is Collingwood's 3rd most successful of their last 3 captains. Just unlucky I guess.
But he was very busy.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
So you think 2.76 goals is not elite for a midfielder?
Career averages?
The thing that made Matthews elite is that he wasn’t just a good mid or good forward.
It’s that he was genuinely elite at both. As a mid he was top shelf. As a forward he was the Coleman medal winner and 9th on the all time goal kicking list. Take out one and he’s still elite at the other.
Yes for a midfielder as they play more minutes in the midfield. That’s the whole point of the 20 and 1.
Except he split his time between forward and midfield - so in reality should be compared to both. You're acting as if he was a stay at home forward pocket like Charlie Cameron.
Martin came home with a wet sail and actually was elite over the last 6-8 games - which makes up a 1/4 to 1/3 of the season. His first 12 he was nowhere near elite and he missed 3 games.
Check where his goal/assist and coaches votes etc averages were at the end of round 17. Everything spiked when Richmond's season was running on fumes and then officially over.
If Martin brought some of that form to the first two thirds of the season Richmond may have played finals.
And a great leader.
For those who think it is a bit off taking aim at elements of Scott's record....it is not so much aimed at the player himself, but mainly at Fadge, who is on record in another thread saying Pendlebury's finals record is only a fraction below Dustin Martin's. A claim even his fellow Collingwood supporters sensibly don't want any part of.
Another stupid comparison.Murphy v Pendles v Selwood in finals:
Disposals; 26.17 v 23.97 v 23.08
Goals: 0.83 v 0.29 v 0.5
GA: 1.0 v 0.48 v 0.85
Goals + GA : 1.83 v 0.77 v 1.35
CP: 12.67 v 10.58 v 10.88
Clearances: 5.83 v 4.87 v 5.40
I50: 4.0 v 3.71 v 3.98
Murphy only played 6 x finals so it’s nowhere near a large enough data set to be conclusive … but it’s easy to see why he’d rate very highly from those 6 x finals he did play. People only remember Murphy from his later years, and not the period where he probably surpassed Judd for a few seasons as Carlton’s best player - which coincided with them playing some finals.
Pendles is an interesting one. Taking out his injured 2009 final, from 2007-2010 he played 9 finals for an average of 1.44 goals and goal assists … right up there with Danger (1.57), Swan (1.40) and Selwood (1.35) in finals.
But then from 2011 to 2023, he played 21 finals for an average of just 0.52 goals and goal assists.
From renowned ‘non-goal scoring mids’ Matt Priddis was 0.58 from his 12 finals. Neale 0.63 from his 19 finals. Joel Corey 0.83 from 23. James Kelly 0.65 from 23. Brett Kirk 0.61 from 18 finals. Cotchin 0.88 from 16 finals.
It’s a really weird finals record for Pendles to be:
H&A: 1.30 goals and GA
Finals 2007-2010: 1.44
Finals 2011-2023: 0.52
0.52 is almost unheard of for a midfielder in terms of scoreboard damage.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
1 is considerably less than 2.7
Not even close.That’s what 20 and 1 is nowadays.
Different eras unless you really think Lethal was more than twice a better kick than players like GAJ and Dusty.
Another stupid comparison.
Selwood played a heavy amount of finals from 19 years old. He also started primarily as a wing option the first 2-3 years. Then he played 17 finals in his 30s.
It would be something similar for Pendlebury.
Selwood still frequented Geelong's best players and hit good numbers in these early/late periods. But it's silly to compare raw averages for one player who had 40 finals spread fairly evenly over a 16 year career - to a guy who only played 6 finals, all aged between 22 and 26 years old.
Not even close.