Totally agree. I’d even argue AA team isn’t auto-elite, as ATEOTD, being in the team or the squad is a subjective decision … Libba or Viney could’ve easily been picked over Serong, so does that mean they are ‘auto-elite’ and Serong isn’t??
I’d suggest if a player has a good combo of AA, coaches votes (for their position), Brownlow votes (for position), good B&F result (might be top-6 in a top-team, top-3 in a bottom team), good stats in comparison to players in similar positions, then you can start to build a picture whether the player was in the best 5% or so in their position, or if they were ‘back in the pack’.
For some things like winning coaches voting it’s auto-elite, irrespective of other metrics. For others like making AA squad or a podium finish in B&F, you’d need other data points to confirm (or deny) your case for elite status.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
AA is a better system though as even though small forwards and small defenders still get completely shafted in the All Australian team at least players like tall defenders, ruckmen and key forwards get a look in. AA teams are forced to pick players who are not midfielders, which is more than most other awards. Brownlow and even Coaches votes are just midfielder awards. Willing to bet most players who win a B&F are midfielders too.