- Thread starter
- #201
They had the same opportunity in the Turnbull (level terms) where Zipping was a bit too good for El segundo.
They didn't in the Cox Plate.
Sethlad was telling everyone all year Zipping can't stay, so once again you're off the mark.
The only other time they met in the Cox Plate it was over with the barriers with el Segundo getting a 8-10 length start.
Ricketts, the no work early theory is flawed.
The REASON Zipping and Marasco were at the tail is they drew the widest, ok?
B Graders in the McKinnon? The lineup is the same as the Cox Plate, this is an A Grade group 1 WFA race (Cox Plate part 2) on a fairer track.
Yes bigger things in mind for MC runners but a good race all the same and a few points to prove.
They didn't in the Cox Plate.
Sethlad was telling everyone all year Zipping can't stay, so once again you're off the mark.
The only other time they met in the Cox Plate it was over with the barriers with el Segundo getting a 8-10 length start.
Ricketts, the no work early theory is flawed.
The REASON Zipping and Marasco were at the tail is they drew the widest, ok?
B Graders in the McKinnon? The lineup is the same as the Cox Plate, this is an A Grade group 1 WFA race (Cox Plate part 2) on a fairer track.
Yes bigger things in mind for MC runners but a good race all the same and a few points to prove.