So something like 2,18,20 is that right?
If PP awarded at beginning of 2nd round it would be #2, 19, 21
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So something like 2,18,20 is that right?
On right because of the 2 compo picks.If PP awarded at beginning of 2nd round it would be #2, 19, 21
Cain, I'm not huge on - I know he's greatly performed in the VFL, but he's a short term solution.
If any team in recent history needed a priority pick before the No 1 pick its us. I hope we get it rather than a second rounder but I don't think they want GWS to lose pick 1 as it has so much currency with Boyd.
It could be argued that we need the trade currency more than GWS.
Preaching to the converted my good man. They have the makings of an epic team in 3-5 years we have the making of an epic episode of the Benny Hill Show.It could be argued that we need the trade currency more than GWS.
I would take that, as much as I'd love P1 that does give us enough bait to get a top 10-15 mid in the comp. Even higher if they want out already or are looking for more coin.We definitely do. Whether we're graciously gifted the pick or not is another matter.
Given how much the AFL wants GWS to succeed, I'd say it's unlikely we'd get #1. What about a first round pick adjacent to our current pick, ie #2, #3? That'd cover GWS but allow us to draft in another top talent whilst sticking two fingers up at the rest of the competition.
dont rate him at all tbhNick Lower would probably be worth looking at - just been delisted by the Dogs, but only because they have enough of his type of inside players.
If any team in recent history needed a priority pick before the No 1 pick its us. I hope we get it rather than a second rounder but I don't think they want GWS to lose pick 1 as it has so much currency with Boyd.
I'll be interested to hear the justification if we don't get it. A team thats has won about 20-25% of its games in the last 7 years & that includes the 'bumper years' of 8 wins in '10 &'11. Look at those years & as an aberration & take them out, we average about a 15-20% win rate.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...n-for-draft-help/story-fni5f91a-1226710891853
Article outlines decision to be made at next commission meeting on 23rd Sept.
It goes on to say MFC have made submission for either beginning of R1 or end of R1 PP.
Seems odd to make two submissions. We want beginning of R1, end of. Would imagine it's not an all or nothing scenario.