I mentioned Alex Forster before - possible rookie spot - thoughts?I think we will delist Callinan, Joyce, Martin and L.Thompson with one of the last 2 getting a rookie list spot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I mentioned Alex Forster before - possible rookie spot - thoughts?I think we will delist Callinan, Joyce, Martin and L.Thompson with one of the last 2 getting a rookie list spot.
How so?
Where have we so significantly improved our list?
Our list is nowhere near the top 7 sides (Hawks, Geelong, Freo, Sydney).
Richmond/Essendon/Collingwood are all much better placed than us.
It will be a fight between North, Carlton, Port, West Coast and us for that 8th spot. We will need a very very favourable draw and injury count to finish in the 8.
Chin upHow so?
Where have we so significantly improved our list?
Our list is nowhere near the top 7 sides (Hawks, Geelong, Freo, Sydney).
Richmond/Essendon/Collingwood are all much better placed than us.
It will be a fight between North, Carlton, Port, West Coast and us for that 8th spot. We will need a very very favourable draw and injury count to finish in the 8.
Anyone catch Noble on 5AA earlier?
Ah cheers mate, had been trying to get that out of them all arvo.He's on at 1705 local time according to AFC Twitter account
Not seeing Johncock on many "to-delist" lists. Also, where is the official release suggesting Hartigan will be promoted? Not saying there isn't one, but just haven't seen one around.
Did anyone happen to catch the AFL websites trade wrap?
Curious of what they said about the Crows trade period from an outsiders POV.
Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk 2
Port didn't really improve on any areas of weakness though, they just got more of what they already have. Nothing wrong with that as it provides good depth, but they are still lacking on another KPF to compliment Schulz, and another decent KPD to put pressure on Carlisle and Trengove. I'm surprised they didn't go after someone like Gumbleton.I think their comments were positive.....not overly but never the less positive. They took into account that we had nothing to start with and gave us a C. Port got a B- which for all intense purposes is about the same. This despite the Power getting Polec. They did however like the Power selecting White....which I do too. Further on when they were rating Melbourne that said that Melb paid too much for Vince. They made the comment that Vince was past his best and that Adelaide would have been happy to get pick 23 for him.
How so?
Where have we so significantly improved our list?
Our list is nowhere near the top 7 sides (Hawks, Geelong, Freo, Sydney).
Richmond/Essendon/Collingwood are all much better placed than us.
It will be a fight between North, Carlton, Port, West Coast and us for that 8th spot. We will need a very very favourable draw and injury count to finish in the 8.
Not seeing Johncock on many "to-delist" lists. Also, where is the official release suggesting Hartigan will be promoted? Not saying there isn't one, but just haven't seen one around.
Don't see it necessary to promote Hartigan when he has only played 3 average gamesNot seeing Johncock on many "to-delist" lists. Also, where is the official release suggesting Hartigan will be promoted? Not saying there isn't one, but just haven't seen one around.
- AFC list manager Noble said today that AFC will use picks 23 and 46 actively in the National Draft - that doesn't exclude Hartigan, but the suggestion was the picks would be used on 2 kids from the draft (Takes us up to our 40 again).
Don't see it necessary to promote Hartigan when he has only played 3 average games
Wow that was quick, thought Noble was holding off till next week!
The two that were definitely gone, what happens next now depends on what McKernan does, and whether we decide to only go into the draft with one or two live picks. Tambling and Riley on the edge.
I put this scenario to you. There was a window of opportunity that we missed, Polec's management were happy with our deal (you ever wonder why FAITH was so confident). It all went to shit when it became clear we could never satisfy Brisbane in a trade. He stated (through his management) that he was not prepared to go to the PSD so negotiations with Poort were intensified. By the end of week 1 of trade month the Poort deal was clearly the most attractive.
Now don't say Bullshit (or poppycock) because you really dont have a clue if Im right or wrong.
Sounds like pure fantasy to me, not a single bit of it is supported by what happened in public. Apply Occam's razor.
We better rookie list a ruckman
Then we can **** Graham off next year.