2014 Brownlow Medal

[Murphinator]

What if he comes top 3?

I'll be very surprised if he is top 5

some of the ardent dislike that seems to be there for gray is just odd. its not like he's a sniper, or a diver, or bailed on his old club etc. boak's season also wasn't as dominant as past years - he had around 4 clear great games, then a few reasonable ones.

Don't get me wrong, I love and admire Gray very much as a player and have rated him for some time. I just don't think he will poll so well that he is within a chance of the medal

lol. Are you basing Boak getting more votes off of stats?

I never allocate votes from stats. Between a couple friends and I, we watch every game and allocate votes.

I have a lot of 2's for Gray, not many BOGs. Boak won't do exceptionally well either - good even share amongst the Port boys in my tally.

 

[pete galvin]

We get your point, you don't think SJ will poll more than 1 in round 4. I'm not sure how you can be so sure though, umpires sometime vote for who they see getting the ball a lot regardless of disposal. Let me guess, you had Swan on 20 votes in 2011 because he butchered it more than Judd and Pendles?

coz I have been watching every game and replays for 5 years mate....not looking at stats until I have decided who I like....rnd 4 until I looked at the stats I had no dea stevie-j had 37 disposals...didn't look like that many,and i'm sure at least one umpire woulda seen the steviej blooper roll they put up in the 3rd quarter..seriously,as a cats fan,that was the most INEFFECTIVE game I have ever seen stevie j play..lol......

 

[pete galvin]

BTW..................SPORTSBET MULTIS ARE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[max grande]

Sportsbet ha

BTW..................SPORTSBET MULTIS ARE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The prices have been absolutely belted in too!

 

[Jugada]

coz I have been watching every game and replays for 5 years mate....not looking at stats until I have decided who I like....rnd 4 until I looked at the stats I had no dea stevie-j had 37 disposals...didn't look like that many,and i'm sure at least one umpire woulda seen the steviej blooper roll they put up in the 3rd quarter..seriously,as a cats fan,that was the most INEFFECTIVE game I have ever seen stevie j play..lol......

Umpires don't watch replays but they do look at stats

 

[Keystone agony]

Umpires don't watch replays but they do look at stats

Dont look at stats either according to an article

 

[Murphinator]

umpires do not look at stats..

 

[DT_35]

Danger > Sloane $1.64 thoughts?

 

[happy_eagle]

Danger > Sloane $1.64 thoughts?

Should win it
I just did a multi with Dangerfield(ade), Harvey(NM) and Kennedy(Syd) for 3.14

 

[Jugada]

Dont look at stats either according to an article

According to an interview on brownlow night a couple years back they do

 

[max grande]

Danger > Sloane $1.64 thoughts?

I have Dangerfield (14), Thompson (11) and Sloane (12) for what its worth.

Have put Dangerfield in a few of my bets, but have not locked him in too many.

 

[pete galvin]

Umpires don't watch replays but they do look at stats

And the Brownlow is for "fairest and best" player......not "most disposals".....

 

[Jugada]

And the Brownlow is for "fairest and best" player......not "most disposals".....

Thanks I'll keep that in mind

 

[X_box_X]

If Lewis is BOG tonight I reckon he will overtake Gazza to become second favourite.

It happens every year.

 

[The GOAT]

If Lewis is BOG tonight I reckon he will overtake Gazza to become second favourite.

It happens every year.

Yep. If Geelong lose and Port win big Robbie Gray will probably be the Brownlow favourite

 

[max grande]

Does anyone rate Cotchin a chance for Leader After Round 4 w/o Selwood?

And on some counts he is as high as 7 votes, while Ablett is 6 and Johnson anywherer from 4-6. Seems well and truly over the odds doesnt he?

 

[happy_eagle]

Does anyone rate Cotchin a chance for Leader After Round 4 w/o Selwood?

And on some counts he is as high as 7 votes, while Ablett is 6 and Johnson anywherer from 4-6. Seems well and truly over the odds doesnt he?

Cotchin is a chance for the R4-Selwood

R1: Should get the 2 behind Ablett. 2 Votes
R2: Played better than I thought here, still think Murphy was BOG. 2-1 Votes
R3: Either he or Macrae will get the 3. Bulldogs winning may edge Cotchin out. 3-2 Votes
R4: Won't poll

So between 5-7 should be his mark. Either way he's good odds (assuming he's still around the 8.00 he was when I got on)

 

[TheJanuaryMan]

According to an interview on brownlow night a couple years back they do

just to answer this one again - just over halfway down the article. they do NOT look at stats

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/brownl...snt-broken-so-why-fix-it-20140821-106mrs.html

 

[TheJanuaryMan]

BTW..................SPORTSBET MULTIS ARE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

are they offering a multi on whether stevie j polls in round 4?

 

[King Of Money]

Kangas most votes - Does anyone give DalSanto a chance? His odds look way overs to me.

Harvey seems to be the unanimous pick here and Sportsbet odds reflect that ($1.33). But, I have him less than a vote ahead of Dal Santo ($8) and Cunnington another 1.5 votes behind ($3.75).

Also, Harvey hasn't cracked double figure votes past 3 years. Has this year been any better?

 

[Keystone agony]

Have Harvey 16, Cunnington 13, NDS 9.5

 

[Dan]

Backline-mids isn't the formula for Brownlow votes…..Dal Santo will struggle to get to double figures.

 

[pete galvin]

If Lewis is BOG tonight I reckon he will overtake Gazza to become second favourite.

It happens every year.

lol....ya reckon he will get 3 votes tonight mate??

 

[pete galvin]

are they offering a multi on whether stevie j polls in round 4?

I bloody wish..lol

 

[PP34]

Why can't I multi more than 10 most team votes selections?