- Apr 15, 2013
- 5,159
- 10,810
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Looking pudgy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Does anyone know how Weller did in the 3km time trial?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking pudgy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Does anyone know how Weller did in the 3km time trial?
You idiot if you had been awake and read media reports on the 3 k time trial you would know that it was held at McGillvray Oval.I heard he didn't finish because he got distracted by an icecream van driving past Freo Oval.
You idiot if you had been awake and read media reports on the 3 k time trial you would know that it was held at McGillvray Oval.
Now I have worked it out your picking on someone's buddy for a laugh.So who is Gaskin's buddy?Weller is so fat he takes up multiple postcodes.
Now I have worked it out your picking on someone's buddy for a laugh.So who is Gaskin's buddy?
Now I have worked it out your picking on someone's buddy for a laugh.So who is Gaskin's buddy?
Of CourseLachie Neale.
Not really, I'm just making fun of the fact that someone so obviously in great shape was called out-of-shape.
He said himself that he needs to work on his endurance: http://www.fremantlefc.com.au/news/2015-12-18/im-excited-to-be-back-weller
A little bird told me he finished behind Griff in the 3km time trial.
So if a little bird told me that Griff finished 6th, Weller's results would be pretty good for a player entering their 2Nd pre-season?
Again I am very bullish on Weller, and he will be a gun. However, I heard after his result the club gave him a kick up the ass. Blakely on the other hand has been extremely impressive from what I've heard.
What's your source about the kick up the ass that Weller supposedly got?. If he as a 2nd year player and came in at 7th place I would be reasonably happy. Lets worry about the next 3Km test next week. Look forward to hearing who your source is or is it some made up story?Again I am very bullish on Weller, and he will be a gun. However, I heard after his result the club gave him a kick up the ass. Blakely on the other hand has been extremely impressive from what I've heard.
The point I was trying to make (maybe a little mischievously) was that saying things like "the club gave him a kick up the ass" without sources comes across as saying things for the sake of saying them.
It reminds me of the way Damien Barrett reports.
In my opinion if you are going to come onto a public forum and report what the club has said you should either site your sources, or if you are uncomfortable doing so provide us with a reason for why this should be taken as fact.
Not having a crack, as a fan I'm happy to get the inside info and appreciate the posts. I would say though if what you say is true (and I am not saying it's not) don't you think that if your well connected mate needs to be kept anonymous that he may not appreciate you posting it on the worlds biggest footy website? When identities need protecting it's generally because info isn't meant for public consumption.
That is your opinion, and it is one which I do not support. I am not a journalist, and therefore everything I post on here is to provide insight to the community. Whether you or others believe what I have said is a personal choice. I am merely posting what I have heard from an individual who is remarkably well connected.
It is quite valid to question the truthfulness of what I have said, and any rationally minded person would do the same. Treat what I say with the skepticism it deserves, but I do not have the time or inclination to sit at home and invent stories.
TL;DR
I am going to post what I hear. If you don't like the fact that I will keep my friend anonymous, and keep my info uncited then you can put me on ignore.
Hi Just for info purposes. I understand that there were no training watchers at the 3 km done early morning at McGillvary Oval. The only info who ran where that is available are some photos on the Dockers website and the associated article so finishing positions other than top 3 (i think it was) were not disclosed.Training reports are really valuable in the sense that its straight from the horses mouth, first hand observation, people watching and reporting, and even then we as readers filter it through a fair amount of skepticism based how we perceive how that person posts on other topics.
2nd hand "I heard.." stuff isn't much use even if you use terms like "remarkably well connected" as it doesn't constitute anything other than gossip. Its like Kim Hagdorn writing a story using phrases like "Sources inside the club say". Once its out in the public domain its subject to scrutiny, and it makes it no difference it its printed in the local rag or on a footy fan website.
Reasonable examples of skepticism might be:
i)You could have a remarkably well connected friend that is prone to hyperbole when relating stories.
ii) Griffin may have had a lap to go when the remarkably well connected friend saw him pass the finishing line in front of Weller
iii) Everyone gets something akin to a kick up the arse during the pre-season, no biggie, that's what pre-season is for.
Maybe in a week or two someone will confirm that what you posted is likely to be true, based on hearing the same thing broadcast on a sports radio program by one of the hosts who heard it was a story brewing for a while from another journo who has been trying to uncover the facts, after being alerted to it by the wife of friend at a dinner party who happened to mention that her son read about it on Big Footy.
On the other hand you could be spot on.