I think they may have done that in a battle royal on smackdown? nobody would have watched it thoughAnticipating some funny Miz/Mizdow byplay in the Rumble match.
If Miz gets eliminated, will Mizdow throw himself out too?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think they may have done that in a battle royal on smackdown? nobody would have watched it thoughAnticipating some funny Miz/Mizdow byplay in the Rumble match.
If Miz gets eliminated, will Mizdow throw himself out too?
Top 5 win list:
Ziggler
Bray
Ambrose
BNB
......... Reigns
I'm just hoping they do take into account just how predictable the next couple of months looks to be & they throw in some kind of swerve.
Don't really care much at all what or who it is but just something... Anything..... Different.
Pretty much, & that's exactly the problem.I Say they might add something to the Main Event but I can’t see anyone else then Reigns winning the Title at WM31
Pretty much, & that's exactly the problem.
Just can't see any other scenario happening so it'll pretty much be the same as watching a movie that you've already heard all the spoilers for. It just saps a lot of the entertainment from it all.
That was no Different Last Year with Batastia but Bryan was so over they changed there mind. Would you like the same thing happen again?
So in other word's its safe to watch WWE until after WM. Or I can revert back to the NXT days where I used to fast-forward anything Bryan related. Goodbye most main events after WMBryan's winning. (Sorry Rainfall)
Remember when Ambrose was talked about as being the most over guy since Steve Austin? That was wrong. That is easily Bryan. He connects with the fans in a way few people do.
WWE would be absolutely stupid to announce Bryan entering the Rumble and then not have him win it. If they want Reigns to be a heel, then have him eliminate Bryan last, but they don't want that. If Bryan is eliminated earlier, the crowd, especially where they are, will shit on the rest of the rumble, and if Reigns wins then they will be volatile.
They're not going to risk that again. Bryan is winning.
I'm curious, why don't you like Bryan?So in other word's its safe to watch WWE until after WM. Or I can revert back to the NXT days where I used to fast-forward anything Bryan related. Goodbye most main events after WM
Can't like this enough. It just has to happen.Bryan's winning. (Sorry Rainfall)
Remember when Ambrose was talked about as being the most over guy since Steve Austin? That was wrong. That is easily Bryan. He connects with the fans in a way few people do.
WWE would be absolutely stupid to announce Bryan entering the Rumble and then not have him win it. If they want Reigns to be a heel, then have him eliminate Bryan last, but they don't want that. If Bryan is eliminated earlier, the crowd, especially where they are, will shit on the rest of the rumble, and if Reigns wins then they will be volatile.
They're not going to risk that again. Bryan is winning.
I don't like the disrespect he shown The Miz during NXTI'm curious, why don't you like Bryan?
But no, it's not safe for you anymore.
Wait.. That's it?I don't like the disrespect he shown The Miz during NXT
I also went from liking Cole to hating him for the same reason
Bryan's winning. (Sorry Rainfall)
Remember when Ambrose was talked about as being the most over guy since Steve Austin? That was wrong. That is easily Bryan. He connects with the fans in a way few people do.
WWE would be absolutely stupid to announce Bryan entering the Rumble and then not have him win it. If they want Reigns to be a heel, then have him eliminate Bryan last, but they don't want that. If Bryan is eliminated earlier, the crowd, especially where they are, will shit on the rest of the rumble, and if Reigns wins then they will be volatile.
They're not going to risk that again. Bryan is winning.
This is pretty much the exact same scenario as last year, although Reigns isn't hated nearly as much as Batista was. They'd have to be absolute idiots to repeat history.I seriously hope you're right & on paper all of that makes sense 100%. But...
It is amazing how quickly people can forget & underestimate just how screwed up & backward the WWE can be a heck of a lot of the time.
This is pretty much the exact same scenario as last year, although Reigns isn't hated nearly as much as Batista was. They'd have to be absolute idiots to repeat history.
Also the issue was Reigns not winning. Without Bryan, the crowd went to who they thought should win with Reigns and his record. Batista was a bust that nightThe Batista hate didn't really come to a head and boil over quite so much as until he had actually won the Rumble over Bryan but yeah I reckon you're on the point
Honestly, they didn't go to who they thought should win, they just went with the person that wasn't Batista.Also the issue was Reigns not winning. Without Bryan, the crowd went to who they thought should win with Reigns and his record. Batista was a bust that night
Not gonna lie, didn't watch, going by what I was told by people that did.Honestly, they didn't go to who they thought should win, they just went with the person that wasn't Batista.
They were behind Punk, then Punk went. Nobody cared about Sheamus, nobody wanted Batista, so they cheered for Reigns. He was the only one to cheer for by process of elimination.
Also the issue was Reigns not winning. Without Bryan, the crowd went to who they thought should win with Reigns and his record. Batista was a bust that night
Bryan's winning. (Sorry Rainfall)
Remember when Ambrose was talked about as being the most over guy since Steve Austin? That was wrong. That is easily Bryan. He connects with the fans in a way few people do.
WWE would be absolutely stupid to announce Bryan entering the Rumble and then not have him win it. If they want Reigns to be a heel, then have him eliminate Bryan last, but they don't want that. If Bryan is eliminated earlier, the crowd, especially where they are, will shit on the rest of the rumble, and if Reigns wins then they will be volatile.
They're not going to risk that again. Bryan is winning.
Honestly, they didn't go to who they thought should win, they just went with the person that wasn't Batista.
They were behind Punk, then Punk went. Nobody cared about Sheamus, nobody wanted Batista, so they cheered for Reigns. He was the only one to cheer for by process of elimination.
I'm just hoping they do take into account just how predictable the next couple of months looks to be & they throw in some kind of swerve.
Don't really care much at all what or who it is but just something... Anything..... Different.
I don't think you're quite understanding my point. My point isn't that if Roman wins that people will hate it, it's that if Bryan doesn't win then people will hate it. Go to his latest return on Raw, he was still the most over person on the program by some way, despite having only been seen once in the past 4 months or so.It isn't that clear cut. The only thing similar about Batista and Reigns is that the internet fans don't want them to win. Reigns is over big time and he has a big supporter base from both internet fans and the majority of WWE followers. Batista didn't have support from internet fans and the majority of WWE fans had forgotten who he was. The WWE were wrong for bringing Batista in as a face, that's it. The crowd won't shit on the Rumble if Reigns wins it this year. The crowd might be split but it will be pretty even so the hate won't be noticeable. My guess is Bryan will be in the match early and will be eliminated by someone not involved in the match. Like J&J security for example. Then the heat will be on those guys, not Reigns when he wins.
I know you like Reigns, and I'm not saying that the people hated Reigns. Obviously they didn't or else as you said they would have chanted "You Both Suck".This is just unfair and untrue. Reigns had just put on an awesome performance and was clearly the highlight of last year's Rumble. He dominated and people loved it. He was also part of the most over stable in the last ten years. If they ididn't want Reigns to win then they could've chanted 'you both suck' or 'boring' like they did in the Orton Cena match, but they didn't. The crowd was still into the match because they genuinely wanted to see Reigns win.
This is just unfair and untrue. Reigns had just put on an awesome performance and was clearly the highlight of last year's Rumble. He dominated and people loved it. He was also part of the most over stable in the last ten years. If they ididn't want Reigns to win then they could've chanted 'you both suck' or 'boring' like they did in the Orton Cena match, but they didn't. The crowd was still into the match because they genuinely wanted to see Reigns win.
Being unpredictable for the sake of being unpredictable never works. It always leads to something worse that you'll hate even more. Last year's main event was bleedingly obvious yet people seemed to love that.